SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Fox News NOW SBVFT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
FredRum
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 118
Location: Reston, VA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Neal clearly needs to stick with movie reviews! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
producehawk
PO1


Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 463

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 11:32 pm    Post subject: uninformed Reply with quote

We need to keep debunking the lefts false talking points. They keep using the same things over and over, hoping that if you repeat a falsehood often enough people will believe it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JT8D
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 6
Location: Westfield, MA.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FredRum wrote:
Incidentally, I was just watching the Beltway Boys. Today it was Fred Barnes and Juan Williams, and they mentioned SwiiftVets for about a minute.

Basically, Fred's opinion is: "Here's what I think the press's obligation is: If charges come out that have some substance behind them, the press needs to check it out.... The press is derelict in its duty.... Why won't he do do a Form 180?"

Juan can be summed up with: "I think this IS a smear campaign.... Everyone has checked this out. The US govt has checked this out.... It's a smear."

I'd like to invite Juan back from Planet Carville to join the rest of us earthlings.


Juan Williams will not lilkely ever make the trip back to reality--even if you placed a pack of C4 up his posterior orifice. I think FOX retains him more as the "village idiot", rather than as a serious commentator. The man's viewpoints are often so devoid of factual reference, or else his "facts" are typically so removed from thier original context, as to be absurd. The inane drivel of Williams is put further into perspective when one considers the approach of his fellow NPR traveler--Mara L.-- at least she speaks intelligently, and seems credible at times. In short Juan Williams behaves like a perfect ass.
_________________
Never Forget September 11, 2001. Better that a man dies fighting... then live his life in fear.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
You GottaBeKidding
Rear Admiral


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scott,

It's Jane Hall, not Jane Skinner. Jane Skinner is a Fox news personality, I think. I see her interacting with Shep Smith. Let's not tar the wrong person.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 1603
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My mistake. Embarassed Of course, Jane Skinner is the lady that appears on the Fox Report with Shepard Smith - he calls the segment "Skinnerville" (or used to).

I'll edit my previous post. Thanks.
_________________
Bye bye, Boston Straggler!


Last edited by Scott on Sun Aug 15, 2004 1:06 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beatrice1000
Resource Specialist


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1179
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 12:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just got a "delivery failure" at Foxnewswatch@foxnews.com. [Was trying to send a 2nd email -- a few little points I neglected on my first run . Cool ... Do you think maybe their box is full yet??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gilliam
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 97

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ccr wrote:
Jane Hall (a professor from AU) basicly slandered SBVT. She said this is the same group that did in McCain and that SBVT is lying about everything.

Some other academic looking guy pointed to the factcheck.org as proof that everything in the ad is baseless.


factcheck.org is extremely well respected, it is vital that people from the SBVFT organization communicate well with these people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kurtsprincess
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's the e-mail I sent to factcheck.org and their reply


Quote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Dotti
To: Editor@FactCheck.org
Sent: 8/9/2004 5:37 PM
Subject: Your article titles

Just curious as to why you refer to the Swiftvets organization as
Republican funded, and yet you do not refer to the Moveon organization as being Democratic funded?


Factcheck.org reply

Quote:
We have called Moveon "anti-Bush"

They have thousands of donors.

_________________
KP

A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both.
History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 1603
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree gilliam, but check out this thread: www.swiftvets.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2628&highlight=fact+checking+factcheck+org

McQ comments up front "The usually reliable FactCheck.org..."

They just dropped the ball on this one!
_________________
Bye bye, Boston Straggler!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 1603
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SBVFT will soon have "thousands of donors" as well!

Razz
_________________
Bye bye, Boston Straggler!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tvaughan
Seaman


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 182

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 4:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you read the whole article on factcheck.org, it makes it clear that they really don't know what to believe.

The article itself is a lot of "he said", "she said" using the government citations as evidence. It does not make it clear that the accuracy of the government citations are exactly what is disputed.

The tone is definitely anti-SBVFT, but their conclusion is pretty indecisive.

I wrote a note complaining to newswatch that Gabler says 1) factcheck.org proves the SBVFT are lying and then immediately after says that the Bush campaign assumes the press won't bother to check up on their facts.

I then check Gabler's facts and factcheck.org says nothing close to what Gabler says it does.

There is something really creepy about how some people are reacting to this.

Jane Hall referring to the Boston Globe story when she simply HAD TO KNOW that it was IMMEDIATELY and DECISIVELY disputed. She had to know that the author was directly related to the Kerry campaign...

She knows this but whips it out when someone asks her why she doesn't believe the swiftboat vets. She says something that she has to know it quite useless in making her point!

Just weird. It's like that they kind of think it really is true and just don't want to know about it. I have never heard of someone using plausible deniability for their own personal conclusions!!

Doesn't one usually use plausible deniability for other people?

Just strange. Very strange.
_________________
Talking point #1: Sign 180
Talking point #2: Sign 180
Talking point #3: Sign 180
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JT8D
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 6
Location: Westfield, MA.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 2:54 pm    Post subject: FOX IS BEGINNING TO SEE THE LIGHT Reply with quote

FOX NEWS SUNDAY, 14Aug04:

Brit Hume nails Kerry on the Cambodia flip flop... Shows book 'UNFIT FOR COMMAND'... Defends integrity of SWIFTVETS... To paraphrase: This book isn't full of anonymous accusations... These men who served with John Kerry are signing their names to these charges...

Regarding Cambodia, Brit Hume declares "SWIFTVETS WERE RIGHT about THIS..." (and thus they increase their legitamcy under scrutiny) To paraphrase, Hume describes 'UNFIT FOR COMMAND' as a well-documented and thorough piece of research.

Hume makes the point that since Kerry has made his Vietnam "service" (and not his lousy liberal senate record) to be the premise of judging his character, then the SWIFTVETS have a legitimate case to make.

There was a consensus that the story has legs...

TURN UP THE HEAT AND PUSH HARD GUYS... DRIVE THE GRITTY FACTS RIGHT THROUGH THE KERRY MACHINERY... THIS LYING TRAITOR IS GOING TO BE DESTROYED BY HIS OWN WORDS.
_________________
Never Forget September 11, 2001. Better that a man dies fighting... then live his life in fear.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beatrice1000
Resource Specialist


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1179
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:00 pm    Post subject: Re: FOX IS BEGINNING TO SEE THE LIGHT Reply with quote

Shoot! I'm just about to watch, and now you've told me everything!!
THANKS! Very Happy -- (neat how the info sort of "rolls" across the country, huh?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
4moreyears
Former Member


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 591

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brit Hume's stock is rising and O'Reilly's is plummeting.

Right on Brit, you're giving power to the people.
_________________
kerry returned to the United States on July 22, 1971, held a press conference publicly calling on President Nixon... for the surrender of the United States to North Vietnam.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gilliam
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 97

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beatrice1000 wrote:
Just got a "delivery failure" at Foxnewswatch@foxnews.com. [Was trying to send a 2nd email -- a few little points I neglected on my first run . Cool ... Do you think maybe their box is full yet??


address should be:

newswatch@foxnews.com

not: foxnewswatch
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group