SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

TANG Memo on Bush
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 48, 49, 50 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
azpatriot
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 593
Location: Arizona

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can here it already Laughing

CBS: Wait! the Pentagon can't be right! we ...we... we... have an expert! And .... and.... and... they just have an extra wall!
_________________
Proud to be an American! and member of the PAJAMAHADEEN Cool
FedEx Kinko's: When it absolutely, positively has to be forged overnight Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
You GottaBeKidding
Rear Admiral


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the Pentagon's on it, you can bet that they've got a stable of highly-qualifed experts on it.

Yeee haaaaaa!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kmmpatriot
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FireFox wrote:
Boston Globe is saying Bouffard is saying that the document could have been produced on a Selectric Composer

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/09/11/authenticity_backed_on_bush_documents?pg=2

I don't think that he's read the user manual on it. Anyone know how I can contact him?

It should be as simple as pointing out
page 108 and the graphic I posted earlier.


Only problem with this is that Bouffard is now telling indcjournal that the Globe misrepresented what he said! Does this just keep gettting better or what??? I am having trouble keeping up...

http://www.indcjournal.com/archives/000859.php

~Kylie
_________________
The Wise man draws more Advantage from his Enemies, than the Fool from his Friends. - from Poor Richard's Almanac...and a perfect commentary on the current state of this campaign!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
air_vet
PO2


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 374

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:36 pm    Post subject: Some "expert" Reply with quote

I can't believe any "expert" would "certify" ANYTHING about a multi-generation copy of a copy.

Without the ORIGINAL documents, such "testimony" isn't worth the paper the it's written on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BC
PO3


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 288
Location: Oklahoma City

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Someone on the INDC site posted this link.

This guy guy did some checking.

http://shapeofdays.typepad.com/the_shape_of_days/2004/09/the_ibm_selectr.html
_________________
Remember United Flight 93, "Are you guys ready? Let's roll."
Duty Honor Country
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You will not believe the idiotic response given by Marcel Matley (the handwriting expert) I just copied this part of the trranscript from Drudge

Quote:
Matley "SINCE IT IS REPRESENTED THAT SOME OF THEM ARE DEFINITELY HIS... THEN WE CAN CONCLUDE THEY ARE HIS SIGNATURES."

Rather: "ARE YOU SURPRISED THAT QUESTIONS COME ABOUT THESE. WE'RE NOT, BUT I WAS WONDERING IF YOU'RE SURPRISED."

Matley: "I KNEW GOING IN THAT THIS WAS DYNAMITE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER AND I KNEW THAT POTENTIALLY IT WAS FAR MORE POTENTIAL DAMAGE TO ME PROFESSIONALLY THAN BENEFIT ME. AND I KNEW THAT. BUT WE SEEK THE TRUTH. THAT'S WHAT WE DO. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO PUT YOURSELF OUT. TO SEEK THE TRUTH AND TAKE WHAT COMES FROM IT."


This man is a boob. I recommend everyone contact Marcel Matley at his email address. He must be exposed for what he is... incompetent.

Demand that he publish a retracrtion. Email Marcel Matley at
mmatley@aol.com
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
azpatriot
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 593
Location: Arizona

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nomorelies wrote:

This man is a boob. I recommend everyone contact Marcel Matley at his email address. He must be exposed for what he is... incompetent.

Demand that he publish a retracrtion. Email Marcel Matley at
mmatley@aol.com


Boy did you hit the nail on the head! Here is a supposed professional and he's using AOL for his email. Laughing BOOB is a understatment Mr. Green
_________________
Proud to be an American! and member of the PAJAMAHADEEN Cool
FedEx Kinko's: When it absolutely, positively has to be forged overnight Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lrb111
Captain


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 508

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nomorelies wrote:
You will not believe the idiotic response given by Marcel Matley (the handwriting expert) I just copied this part of the trranscript from Drudge

Quote:
Matley "SINCE IT IS REPRESENTED THAT SOME OF THEM ARE DEFINITELY HIS... THEN WE CAN CONCLUDE THEY ARE HIS SIGNATURES."



He certified forgeries from forgeries. Rolling Eyes
_________________
said Democratic Chairman Terry McAuliffe. "It is inexcusable to mock service and sacrifice."
well, when even the DNC can see it,,,,, then kerry is toast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marcel Matley obviously takes glee in working with the wrong side. Here is an exerpt from an article:

http://fennel.assumption.edu/~guest/view/1996/View0396.htm

Quote:
Then the program turned to Marcel Matley, identified as a "handwriting examiner" with no further credentials given, who offered his opinion that the "suicide" note is genuine. Matley believes that the "deteriorated copy" of the note.... that is, it's been copied over too many times.... and the "stress" Foster was presumably under account for the differences in handwriting. He then went on to show how Foster used different styles of letters in the genuine samples, such as both cursive and block letter "s", for example, and how the same multiple styles appear in the note; and from this he concluded that the same person wrote both the note and the samples known to be genuine.

One problem with Matley's statements is that it is impossible to determine to what extent the copy of the "suicide" note used by the experts has deteriorated from the original.... because the government has yet to release any official copy of the original, much less a high-resolution one. I just don't see how Matley can point out examples of "deterioration" in copies of the note without having seen the original note.



It's deja vu all over again.
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aristotle The Hun
PO1


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 488
Location: Naples FL

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nathanyl wrote:
From Fox - Pentagon sources are saying they think the docs are fake.


Can you tell us more?

Sam
_________________
Deportè Monsieur Kerrè
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
FireFox
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Posts: 84

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't get to that site right now but I did read the manual and it certainly is a very difficult thing to use. There is no superscript support but it did have very fine up and down control. But you'd have to change the type ball to switch font sizes. Not something that you'd use in a memo.

Pouffard said it's possible. I wanted a proof with mathematical certitude that it is impossible; not just illogical.

vet_supporter wrote:
This site has why it would be illogical that the selectric composer would have ever been used.

http://www.donaldsensing.com/2004/09/ibm-introduced-proportional-spacing.html

Quote:
It is 100% mechanical and has no digital electronics. Since it has no memory, the user was required to type everything twice.

...When you're ready to retype the document, you set this dial to the appropriate color/number combination before typing each line. The Composer will automatically insert the right amount of space between words to make the line lengths equal on all lines.


So, no one in their right mind would try to type a memo or even a routine letter on such an inefficient machine. Also, since Killian didn't type, it's unlikely that he could use such a complex machine as he'd have no use to be trained on it. It was marketed to make camera ready text, not as a typewriter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
You GottaBeKidding
Rear Admiral


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I heard the same thing a few minutes ago, but there were no details. The reporter (Wendell Goller, I think, but I wasn't really paying that much attention) said that at least three experts at the Pentagon think the documents are fake.

Would like to hear what they are experts in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FireFox
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Posts: 84

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justification is not the same thing as proportional spacing. Justification is where you fill the line so that the characters on the right line up as in newspaper column print.

So justification would look something
like this. The rain in Spain falls mainly
on the plain. Today is September 10,
2004. Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
You have no new messages.

Nathanyl wrote:
I don't remember seeing this link before. If it's here somewhere I apologize:

http://www.ibmcomposer.org/

Basically there's no way in heaven that a man who was not a typist would have touched one of these monsters and there's no way that one would have been used by the TANG for regular clerical work. Yes you can do proportional typing and right justification with it if your willing to type the whole document twice including having to to type in a code at the end of each line during the first typing like so:

The ability to justify copy easily and quickly is one o-1
of the distinct advantages of your new Composer. By b-2
merely typing copy once, taking a reading from the o-2
Justification window, then setting the Justification g-1

The code at the end of the line is from a little measuring bar on the composer. It's color coded. Check the link for more details.
So in reality using this composer model to type those memo's Killian would have had to first write it out in longhand, then type it once using the codes system for right justification and then type it again exactly the same in order to get the final copy. No way. I'd bet everything I own on him not having done that.

As for the superscripting I'm still looking. The manual for the typesetting machine (IBM did not consider this a typewriter) mentions 3 different elements besides the standard one. A greek element, a technical element, and a mathmatical element. From what I could see the technical and mathmatical element combined could be used to superscript numbers but there's nothing mentioned about doing the same with letters. It's possible of course they came out with one before 1972 and I'm still researching that.

In 1967 IBM did come out with an upgraded model, here's the discription of it:

In 1967, IBM announced the IBM Magnetic Tape Selectric Composer. Documents could be typed and recorded on magnetic tape, and then later played back justified. At the same time, IBM was producing the IBM Magnetic Tape Selectric Typewriter, one of the earliest attempts at turning the regular Selectric typewriter into a word processor. The Tape Selectric units could be used to record raw text onto magnetic tape, after which the tape could be played back in the IBM Magnetic Tape Composer for justification. The Magnetic Tape Selectric Composer is often referred to as the IBM MT/SC.

I can't see how this would've been in a TANG office and even if by chance there was one it wouldn't have been used for normal documents.

There were 2 other versions of the Composer that came out. One in 1975 and another in 1978. You can see pictures and explanation of those models on the site.

My conclusion assuming the that the superscripting could be done (and I'm still not convinced that's the case) is although it would be theoretically possible to do the proportional typing, based on what equipment would have been needed, the time and work involved, and the fact that Lt. Col. Killian didn't routinely type those document were typed on a computer and NOT on a composer.

Please check out the link and see if you can find anything I missed.

Bill Hershey
ASA all the way!
1973-1976
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Debs
Lieutenant


Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 228
Location: Lubbock, Texas

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the Pentagon should be on this and maybe so should the Killian family. If these are "personal files" of Mr. Killians, then, as someone pointed out, these memos are property of the family. And if they are official "personnel files" then they are property of the government and the Pentagon should have them. I wonder if the family could sue CBS to get the originals? And, also these memos are really in a way somewhat defamatory of Mr. Killian, and it appears the family is very upset about all of this. Personally, I think the family might consider suing.

Debbie
_________________
"No greater love..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
You GottaBeKidding
Rear Admiral


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 692

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Someone named Barbara (on Fox, 2:40 p.m.) is saying that the evidence indicates that the memos are forgeries.

She's calling it the CBS version of Jayson (sp?) Blair.

She's obvously a Republican.

The Leslie person is claiming the Swiftboats don't have evidence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 48, 49, 50 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
Page 49 of 67

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group