SwiftVets.com

[hanna]

I asked this question.......in fact I believe it was my first post. Bringing it back, because I am still curious about this and no one has ever said anything more about it, including the Kerry camp. I think they must have read "Unfit" and realized that whatever it was, wasn't there, so they backed off on it, but what? My previous post:
The first reaction this past week to the Swifties ad/book etc, from the Kerry camp was............they have hired a ((&*)(())&() private eye......The information the swifties have brought forth concerning purple hearts, bronze stars etc, do not require a private eye. All that stuff is information based on personal experience and contained in militairy records, some of which Kerry has failed to release, and a private eye is not going to have anymore access to those than anyone else does.

Sooooooooo, what is it that they are worried that a private eye has discovered?????

[Tom Poole]

[hanna]

Unfortunately I don't think you can libel public persons;/

But you are right.......sure would be nice to know what the deep dark secret is. Or, what at least 10 of them are *smirk*.

[Dimsdale]

Good point. But the use of private eyes to smear and defame belong in the Kerry/DNC camp.

Weren't they supposedly distributing "brown books" (maybe, and more appropriately, red books) to the MSM that would have all the results of their private eye's investigations into the personal lives of the Swiftees?

Funny how that never really materialized, at least not as predicted. I am sure they distributed something though, and it was talking points. Look how similar/identical the message from their flying monkeys in the press sounds. All the "completely disproven" "pack of lies" "100% bunk" etc. messages all sound the same, like it was a coordinated effort. Gee, ya think? LOL!

Apparently, they shot their wad with the anti-Islam etc. attacks on John Corsi. After that, it was all ad hominem attacks and smears.

The bottom line is that their private eye has NOTHING on the Swiftees. How could he? They are telling the truth, and are honest and decent men. This basically proves it, because the likes of Kerry and his MSM flunkies would never miss a chance to slam the SBVT with anything, no matter how small. I only wonder why they didn't pull a Rather and make up stuff.

Kerry is hoisted on his petard by his record in Vietnam, after Vietnam, and in the Senate and he knows it.

And until Kerry signs the DD180, and lets the truth go free, I will always call him what I believe he is: a liar, a slanderer, and anti-American.


Crushkerry.com has a piece dated from 9/25/04 that deals with this issue as they deconstruct some articles from the NYTimes and the WaPo that are supposedly based on the so called "brown books."

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:ysJPoI-PVK8J:www.crushkerry.com/article238.html+kerry+brown+books+Swift+boat+private+eye&hl=en


Here is a nice tidbit from the Independent Women's Forum:
http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/archive.asp?start=8/8/2004&end=8/14/2004

[one more captins mast]

Put a opinion in the Jakarta Post on line Sept. 9,2004

Title :Why my aquatiance John Kerry can lose the election.

W. Scott Thompson is a Prof. at "Tufts" Univ. at Medford Mass.
Prof. of International Politicts and Law.

In his post he said, "Julia the first Mrs. Kerry in a kind reconition of my
love of opra sent me note pads for my birthday with musical notes
from Don Govoania where the servent sings of the Don's conquest
in Spain 1003 of them. He did that for a reason, not just to get in
trouble with the "Prof. Union" at "Tufts".

He also said when Kerry was a guest in his home, Adm. Zoomwalt
would not shake Kerrys hand.

This guy also said "in print" and signed the "opinion" that the last time
he saw Kerry was in the lunch room in the White House when he
"a democrat" was working in the Regan adm. and Kerry and he had
run into each other, and "Kerry" while shaking his hand and asking him
to lunch, "looked" over the rest of the room to see if there was someone
moore inportant than "Thompson" to eat lunch with.

There is no love lost here, "Kerry he says did some very naugthy things
while holding high public office, " and he thinks others know of them.


So the "private eye" thing is to cover that up in advance and blame

the Swiftvets when it comes out, and I'm sure this lawyer will make sure

it comes out, can not tell who side he is on, could be its re: his wife

or some relation in Spain, in any event its very personal.


ps, have been trying to get Sam Johnson the congressman from Tx

to read all Navy Cheif's post (faxed them 60 pages) called them

4 times today, "did you look at the fax yet", at 5:00 Tx time they

had not even read one page. Gave Naval Chief the phone no.

If any one on here that reads this and knows a contact in Con. Johnson's

office call them and tell them the fax is not made up by "blather: etal

now on to more work , will try a direct post on the page asking for

many of us to copy the chief's work from here that is avaiable now

and fax it to our congressmen/women and Senators ect.


Pray for Navy Chief and his work
_________________
the strange mr aj