SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

So now wadda we do? – SF 180
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Aristotle The Hun
PO1


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 488
Location: Naples FL

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, Brokow is NBC, not ABC. Dah.

Sam
_________________
Deportè Monsieur Kerrè
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing Laughing Laughing That slipped by me too! But it is so good that you become so absorbed in the content that those little errors just fly right by yah! Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top
wpage
Lieutenant


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 213

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aristotle The Hun,

Thanks you for your many contributions. Please keep up the good hunt. We shouldn't quit until the game is in the bag!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aristotle The Hun
PO1


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 488
Location: Naples FL

PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I sent out a bunch of emails today re my "Acorn" piece. I have lots of email addresses for media, elected officials, blogs, etc. if you feel an urge to help get the word out.

I heard back from John Kerry. His auto-response included this very encouraging sentence:

The e-mail address john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov will no longer be
active.

I kind of like the sound of saying it to myself with a sort of chant like passion over and over again. Twisted Evil

Sam
_________________
Deportè Monsieur Kerrè
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dusty
Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 1264
Location: East Texas

PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I sure hope your letter gets someone on the ball. Just unreal this can stay buried.
Kerry is like Jason. The nighmare just keeps on going and going and.......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aristotle The Hun
PO1


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 488
Location: Naples FL

PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In response to the latest attempt by John Kerry to avoid the issue of his discharge from the Navy I have re-edited my Little Acorns article. Please share this with as many people as you can.

Anyone who needs media email addresses I have them in several flavors; US Newspapers, PM Talk shows, Am talk shows, Blogs, US TV, US radio, etc.

Thanks,

Sam

Little Acorns and Mighty Oaks

I contributed a little acorn to the 2004 election. I use the acorn metaphor because the outcome of what I did seemed to take on a life of its own and grew beyond any of my expectations. In fact the ripples continue to this day.

A brief history of my experience begins in August of 2004. A friend sent me an email about John Kerry’s Navy experiences. I am a Navy veteran so I took a look at the issue. It soon became obvious to me that John Kerry was hiding something about his military experience, so I decided to look at the records Kerry allowed to be published on his campaign web site.

I discovered something I wasn’t seeking. I found John Kerry’s IQ score. I am a Mensa member. I joined Mensa based on my Navy test scores so I knew how to interpret Kerry’s record. My very next thought was to speculate that Bush might be brighter than Kerry and that I could prove it with military IQ scores.

After lengthy research and lots of help from IQ experts I proved my point. Kerry had an IQ between 115 and 120. Bush had an IQ between 125 and 130.

The story was then published on the web. http://www.vdare.com/sailer/kerry_iq_lower.htm That is the essence of my acorn contribution to the 2004 election.

My acorn must have fallen on fertile ground because the New York Times picked up the story and now the whole world knows that Bush is smarter than Kerry. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/24/politics/campaign/24points.html

“Wow!” I said to myself. Talk about maximum effect for minimum effort! But, the acorn just kept growing.

Meanwhile, William Middendorf, former secretary of the Navy, urged Kerry to open up his personnel files to resolve the question of whether the Democratic presidential nominee received a less-than-honorable discharge from the Navy.

In August, the Kerry campaign insisted that all of the senator's Navy records had been released, with the exception of medical papers.
"Senator Kerry's entire military service record is posted on JohnKerry.com. His entire record," said communications adviser Michael Meehan in an attempt to defend Kerry against charges he didn't deserve his three Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star and a Silver Star.

But the Washington Post and others reported that at least 100 pages were still under wraps and that Kerry would need to file a Form 180 to grant permission for full release of his records.

Kerry, however, seemed to contradict his campaign's position in late October, just a week before the election, when he told NBC's Tom Brokaw his military record "is not public." NBC, in fact, edited out that particular comment after including it in a previous version of an interview. To see the original video clip go to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6354942/

BROKAW: Someone has analyzed the president's military aptitude tests and yours, and concluded that he has a higher IQ than you do.
KERRY: That's great. More power. I don't know how they've done it, because my record is not public. So I don't know where you're getting that from.

So now my little acorn had gotten Kerry to admit on NBC news that he had not made his military records public after claiming to have posted his “entire record” on his web site. Soon after Chris Matthews, and Don Imus tried to get Kerry to address the SF 180 issue.
Finally, after the election in January, Kerry told ''Meet the Press" host Tim Russert he would sign the form.

RUSSERT: Many people who've been criticizing you have said: Senator, if you would just do one thing and that is sign Form 180, which would allow historians and journalists complete access to all your military records. Thus far, you have gotten the records, released them through your campaign. They say you should not be the filter. Sign Form 180 and let the historians.
.. .
KERRY: I’d be happy to put the records out. We put all the records out that I had been sent by the military. Then at the last moment, they sent some more stuff, which had some things that weren't even relevant to the record. So when we get – I'm going to sit down with them and make sure that they are clear and I am clear as to what is in the record and what isn't in the record and we'll put it out. I have no problem with that.

RUSSERT: Would you sign Form 180?

KERRY: But everything, Tim…

RUSSERT: Would you sign Form 180?

KERRY: Yes, I will.

Hey! This acorn was becoming a tree. Of course, Kerry is still dodging and weaving. His latest dodge was with the Boston Globe. Before Memorial Day weekend, Sen. John Kerry sat down with editors of his hometown newspaper, the Boston Globe and announced that he had signed the form SF 180, authorizing the Department of Defense to grant access to all his military records. This, more than a year after he had claimed the press and public had seen all there was to see from his military record.

On June 7th Kerry released more innocuous records, http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/06/07/kerry_allows_navy_release_of_military_medical_records/
This only raises more questions than it answers. Since there is nothing new or substantive, why the long drawn out refusal? All I can see is another "sanitized" copy of his records.

The most glaring omission is any reference to the question of Kerry's discharge status. The best commentary I have read about Kerry’s latest attempt to duck the issue of his discharge is at: http://theamericanprowler.com/dsp_prowler.asp

To my own amusement Kerry’s grades while at Yale were released at the same time as the latest military records as part of the Deception Officer’s smokescreen duties. Kerry’s Yale grades revealed that Bush was a slightly better student. No surprise to me since I already knew that Bush had 10 IQ points on Kerry. http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2005/06/07/yale_grades_portray_kerry_as_a_lackluster_student/

Why has it been so much trouble getting Kerry’s military records? That is the elephant in the newsroom that nobody is talking about. If there wasn't something to hide, the obvious solution to Kerry’s problem is to expedite full disclosure.

Several big name media journalists have cornered Kerry about the SF 180 over the last year and still no full disclosure.

I ask a serious question; is there a rational alternative to the conclusion that Kerry is hiding something? Hiding something so important he has allowed this issue to dog him for more than a year, when full release of the records would have stopped the issue in its tracks.

I think that what is in those records will stop Kerry in his tracks. Of course he is stonewalling.

This could be one of the biggest stories of 2005. “The Acorn Who Ate a Presidential Candidate”

I will cooperate and work with any principled journalist who can see that there is a story here.

For background information search Google: sam sewell IQ Kerry bush

Sam Sewell
_________________
Deportè Monsieur Kerrè
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group