SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

We may lose a battle, but let’s not lose the war.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
coldwarvet
Admiral


Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 1125
Location: Minnetonka, MN

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dcornutt wrote:
dcornutt wrote:
Perhaps you can help me here by pointing out which statutes of your MN RNC handbook that you used to determine that McCain is not a Republican by your definition?


Let us start with McCain/Lieberman

Section 7 – Enjoying and Protecting Our Natural Resources
The Republican Party believes that proper stewardship of our natural resources
and agricultural lands will best be achieved through sound science and
adherence to Constitutionally guaranteed property rights. Therefore, we
support:
A. Maintaining clean air, water and land by addressing only those threats
proven by peer-reviewed scientific research, using sensible and
economically reasonable solutions. We oppose radical environmental
proposals such as the Kyoto global warming treaty; we reject the
imposition of the United Nations environmental regulations, such as the
Rio biodiversity treaty, by any state or federal government agency
unless ratified by Congress.

http://whereistand.com/JohnMcCain/4481
_________________
Defender of the honor of those in harms way keeping us out of harms way.

"Peace is our Profession"
Strategic Air Command - Motto

USAF 75-79 Security Police
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
coldwarvet
Admiral


Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 1125
Location: Minnetonka, MN

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
BuffaloJack wrote:
Basically the GOP is being communized, and we don't know how to stop it.


Jack, "how to stop it" seems to me to be almost self-evident...activism to counter each and every strategy. Unfortunately "activism" just hasn't been a traditional part of the "conservative" DNA or MO.

Perhaps the question should be "do we have the will to stop it"? Judging by the momentum propelling the latest leftist global warmism assault, I'm not optimistic.


A good 1st step would be to tell the RNC we have had enough by refusing to vote for McCain.
_________________
Defender of the honor of those in harms way keeping us out of harms way.

"Peace is our Profession"
Strategic Air Command - Motto

USAF 75-79 Security Police
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dcornutt
PO3


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Brooklyn, NY

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

coldwarvet wrote:

Let us start with McCain/Lieberman

Section 7 – Enjoying and Protecting Our Natural Resources
The Republican Party believes that proper stewardship of our natural resources
and agricultural lands will best be achieved through sound science and
adherence to Constitutionally guaranteed property rights. Therefore, we
support:
A. Maintaining clean air, water and land by addressing only those threats
proven by peer-reviewed scientific research, using sensible and
economically reasonable solutions. We oppose radical environmental
proposals such as the Kyoto global warming treaty; we reject the
imposition of the United Nations environmental regulations, such as the
Rio biodiversity treaty, by any state or federal government agency
unless ratified by Congress.

http://whereistand.com/JohnMcCain/4481


Fair enough. Although the link you give is like a wiki of others opinions about what they think the candidate means..and not necessarily what they have said. I've seen "actual" quotes from McCain that suggests that he undestands that the US isn't going to sign onto Kyoto without it being more balanced. (iel, China and India as part of it).

Here's a more accurate depiction of his views:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE3XSjANxNk

He explicitily states that he believes the US was right NOT to join Kyoto, but that if we could get India and China involved that we should "consider" joining the efforts "ON OUR TERMS". He sees this as both an environmental issue/policy AND national security issue (same with oil)

But, given McCain has talked a lot about "Climate Change" and mentions the summit, i'll give that one to you and ask another more important question:

Are you willing to let Obama or Billary win this election over these differences?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coldwarvet
Admiral


Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 1125
Location: Minnetonka, MN

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dcornutt wrote:
coldwarvet wrote:

Let us start with McCain/Lieberman

Section 7 – Enjoying and Protecting Our Natural Resources
The Republican Party believes that proper stewardship of our natural resources
and agricultural lands will best be achieved through sound science and
adherence to Constitutionally guaranteed property rights. Therefore, we
support:
A. Maintaining clean air, water and land by addressing only those threats
proven by peer-reviewed scientific research, using sensible and
economically reasonable solutions. We oppose radical environmental
proposals such as the Kyoto global warming treaty; we reject the
imposition of the United Nations environmental regulations, such as the
Rio biodiversity treaty, by any state or federal government agency
unless ratified by Congress.

http://whereistand.com/JohnMcCain/4481


Fair enough. Although the link you give is like a wiki of others opinions about what they think the candidate means..and not necessarily what they have said. I've seen "actual" quotes from McCain that suggests that he undestands that the US isn't going to sign onto Kyoto without it being more balanced. (iel, China and India as part of it).

Here's a more accurate depiction of his views:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE3XSjANxNk

He explicitily states that he believes the US was right NOT to join Kyoto, but that if we could get India and China involved that we should "consider" joining the efforts "ON OUR TERMS". He sees this as both an environmental issue/policy AND national security issue (same with oil)

But, given McCain has talked a lot about "Climate Change" and mentions the summit, i'll give that one to you and ask another more important question:

Are you willing to let Obama or Billary win this election over these differences?


YES I truly believe the difference between the three is not significant. And this is an opportunity for concervatives to send a message. DO NOT SEND US ANY MORE LIBERALS with an R next to their name WE WILL NOT VOTE FOR THEM.

With that said, lets move onto McCain Kennedy. And after that we can move on to McCain Feingold. And let none of us forget about his relationship with John Kerry. Heck if my memory serves me right wasn’t their discussions between Kerry & McCain about McCain being Kerry’s V.P.?
_________________
Defender of the honor of those in harms way keeping us out of harms way.

"Peace is our Profession"
Strategic Air Command - Motto

USAF 75-79 Security Police
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dcornutt
PO3


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Brooklyn, NY

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's up to you.

Hillary/Obama NOT right to life people. NOT fiscal conservatives. Nor are they determined to even stay in the WOT (both of them announced that they would withdraw from the battlefiled unconditionally).

Obama has "the" most liberal voting record in the senate. Hillary isn't far behind. McCain "is" a conservative. He's just not your particular brand. He even now has the endorsement (despite differences) from the most conservative bloc of the RNC.

What's next? Having McCain as president is worse than Taliban?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baldeagle
PO2


Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Posts: 362
Location: Grand Saline, Texas

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I gotta tellya, folks, for 6/7 years now, we've been witnessing the results of "BDS" (Bush derangement syndrome), a term originally coined by Michelle Malkin, I believe.
Symptoms are complete and unreasonable seething hatred, a ready willingness to believe the most exagerated tale of outrageous doings, etc, etc, and an unhealthy fixation on anything connected.
We have all seen the results of this in the irrational and unpatriotic actions of some the Democrats in congress as well as the writings and pronouncements of the pundits in the more liberal establisments of the MSM.
I am beginning to see some of the same symptoms now from the right side of the political spectrum as regards John McCain. Guess we can call it "McCain derangement syndrome" or MDS.
Now John McCain was not my man in the primaries. He has never been a Senator I have agreed with much on his stances on things, in fact, he has at times infuriated me as, apparently he has done to so many of you.
I hope that we conservatives are more rational than the lefty looneys and able to look at the reality of things prior to the General election in November, because if we aren't.......if we sit it out, or boycott it, or cast protest votes for Nader or Clinton/Obama, and aid and abet the election of a whichever of those is their nominee for the next four years I believe we are in for a term which will make the previous Clinton years, or even the Carter years, seem like a vacation in Shangri La by comparison.
_________________
"In a word, I want an American character, that the powers of Europe may be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others; this, in my judgment, is the only way to be respected abroad and happy at home." --George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Theresa Alwood
Rear Admiral


Joined: 05 Jun 2004
Posts: 631
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it is great that we can disagree and argue our points. I understand the anger, disappointment and frustration of McCain as the probable nomination. I am extremly angry over the fact that I am expected to set aside my differences with McCain and still vote for him and the party...when I see McCain I just get mad as heck! I just plain do not like him....not at all. I am tired of having to just accept these downright corrupt politicans and vote so the lesser of the two evils do not get in the white house and I keep wondering why I am expected to fall into party lines when it seems as if the GOP does very little to want us to support them other than when it is time to vote.

All I wanted was a candidate to come out fighting and not give up. How can just a few states decided who is the candidate? I see that Mike Huckabee is fighting harder than the others but there is something about Mike Huckabee that just does not feel right. I would rather have Huckabee be the nomination over McCain because I could easily pull the lever over any democrat...except McCain.

Will I vote for McCain in the end? Probably...but it will be hard....especially because I truly dislike the man.

I am deeply disappointed in the GOP. I might be changing my party affilation over to Independent because I just do not see where the GOP is my party anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Theresa, I've been unable to "warm-up" to Huckabee but would be hard-pressed to provide specifics. However, Robin at "ChickenHawk Express" was kind enough to post some Huckabee quotes purportedly supplied by Limbaugh which helped me. Perhaps they can help you as well...

Quote:
"American foreign policy needs to change its tone and attitude, open up and reach out. The Bush Administration's arrogant bunker mentality has been counterproductive at home and abroad." - January 2008

"...the underlying conditions that breen [terrorism are] the lack of basic sanitation, health care, education, jobs, a free press, fair courts - which all translates into a lack of opportunity and hope." - January 2008

"We have not had diplomatic relations with Iran in almost 30 years... When one stops talking... differences cannot be resolved and relationships cannot move forward." - January 2008

"I'm not sure that I support the troop surge, if that surge has to come from our Guard and Reserve troops, which have really been overly stretched." - 1/24/07

"There's a lot of support for a tax at the wholesale level for tobacco and that's fine with me; I will very happily sign that because it's a revenue stream." - May 2003

"We can't fight [the War on Terror] to the exclusion of the terror that we have in our own country: the terror of lack of education, the terror of people not knowing if they're going to have money to send their kids to college, and the terror of wondering, if they contract cancer and are diagnosed, how on earth will they pay for the treatment...?" - 8/27/07.

Chickenhawk Express
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baldeagle
PO2


Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Posts: 362
Location: Grand Saline, Texas

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
Theresa, I've been unable to "warm-up" to Huckabee but would be hard-pressed to provide specifics.


I feel the same about "The Huckster" as I call him, #1. When I see him speak, my 1st impression is "Snake Oil Salesman". Its just a feeling and I can't pinpoint the reasons.
_________________
"In a word, I want an American character, that the powers of Europe may be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others; this, in my judgment, is the only way to be respected abroad and happy at home." --George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Theresa Alwood
Rear Admiral


Joined: 05 Jun 2004
Posts: 631
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I knew there was something about him. I just am really disappointed in our lack of coming up with a good candidate...even a decent one.

I guess what upsets me the most is McCain and Huckabee were the two I least liked....and here we are. Yet I am suppose to get behind the person and know everyone else seems to be moving behind McCain. I just plain do not like the man. I really wanted to cry when Romney dropped out...it was like our last chance.

Now they are predicting that Obama will beat Hillary...what a crazy world we live in. How this whole race turns out will be a surprise to all the critics who had McCain over before he started along with Obama.

I really think the only chance we have is for Hillary to win the nomination. But November is still a long way off. Lots can happen between then and now. All we can do know is wait and see.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Theresa, perhaps there'll be some solace to be had in the vice presidential candidate. I can't imagine that McCain wouldn't use the opportunity to select someone whose conservative credentials are nearly impeccable. The question is, would someone with that type of qualification be willing to serve under McCain.

It should be interesting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baldeagle
PO2


Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Posts: 362
Location: Grand Saline, Texas

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would feel a lot better about a Clinton or Obama victory in November if we still had Newt and the class of 94 in the house and a majority in the senate so as to put a little brakes on their ambitious socialist agenda.
Unfortunately, it is all too easy to imagine Reid and Pelosi drooling at the mouth awaiting the inaugeration of someone who will not stymie their far left plans driven by Moveon, et al.
Its scarey.
Iraq pull-out
Stacking the Supreme Court with more like Ginsberg and Kennedy and Souter.
The death of Bush's tax cuts.........and very possible more tax increases.
Signing on to Kyoto
Caving in to Gore and his GW fraud
and more
At the cost of repeating myself...........its scarey.
_________________
"In a word, I want an American character, that the powers of Europe may be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others; this, in my judgment, is the only way to be respected abroad and happy at home." --George Washington
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dcornutt
PO3


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Brooklyn, NY

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They have both promised to withdraw troops unconditionally from Iraq as soon as they are in office. They say the first order of business will be to task the various depts and miltary to draw up plans to begin an immediate withdrawal. For Obama, it's not just an Iraq pullout, but strategic withdrawal of our bases all over the world. That includes Afghanistan. Obama wants to bring "all" the troops back home where they belong and are not causing trouble. Both of them want to subject US and our military to International Courts and opinion. They want the international community to have more say in what our policy is (since our policies affect them in so many ways). Hillary's military withdrawal is about "change" to acknowledge and rectify Bush's mistake of starting a war in Iraq.

They both will bring socialized medicine. In Hillary's case, she plans on doing this by making it manditory. Parents will be fined if their children are not covered, etc., Obama says everyone will have the same healthcare that he does right now..and that it will happen by the end of his first term. And the reason and way it will happen is beause of hope. Not just the word hope...but hope by doing...because it's change we can believe in.

Obama's politics is left of Kennedys. He's got one of, if not the most, liberal voting historys/records in the senate.

Here's an Obama Campaign office for you:

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/11/video-campaign-office-decor-of-the-day/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dcornutt wrote:
Here's an Obama Campaign office for you:


Good lord...

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shawa
CNO


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 2004

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am really struggling to bring myself to support McCain. But he is SO WRONG-HEADED on issues which gravely affect our sovereignty and our economy.
The only thing I can put in the plus column is he is pro-life and he supports the war and our troops. (American Honor).
But joining the ICC could put our soldiers before an international court on trumped up charges of war crimes.
He supports our signing on to L.O.S.T. (overseen by the corrupt UN who would collect taxes, transport fees and fines on international cargo shipping) - another burden on our economy and sovereignty.
And then there is McCain-Lieberman bill on AGW, which would greatly increase government taxes on gasoline and other energy, burdening our economy even more.

McCain on:
International Criminal Court

Law Of The Sea Treaty

McCain Leiberman Global Warming
_________________
“I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 3 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group