SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Debatathon II - All Debate Comments HERE - PLZ!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 30, 31, 32, 33  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Fabius Cunctator
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 84
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chance wrote:
I had one of those "light bulb" moments this morning. Wonder if it's possible that Kerry's remark about Cheney's daughter was calculated? Now he can go on TV and apologize and have everyone say what a kind, caring man he is. Also would make him come across as having admitted to making a "mistake".



According to his advisor, Mary Beth Cahill, Mary Cheney is fair game, so it was calculated, both by Edwards and by Kerry. Apparently a number of Democrats as well as Republicans, and journalists cringed when he did it, and considered it a gratuitous remark, a low blow. I sincerely hope it haunts him the rest of the campaign.

________________________________________________________
Quintus Fabius Maximus Cunctator
USMCR – 1974 to the present.

"Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum; qui victoriam cupit, milites inbuat diligenter; qui secundos optat eventus, dimicet arte, non casu. Nemo provocare, nemo audet offendere quem intellegit superiorem esse, si pugnet." - F. Vegetii Renati Epitoma Rei Militaris, AD 380
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jataylor11
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 856
Location: Woodbridge, Virginia

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chance wrote:
I had one of those "light bulb" moments this morning. Wonder if it's possible that Kerry's remark about Cheney's daughter was calculated? Now he can go on TV and apologize and have everyone say what a kind, caring man he is. Also would make him come across as having admitted to making a "mistake".


When you are a jerk to someone else but then you apologize afterwards this doesn't make you less of a jerk. Possibly just a forgiven jerk ---depending upon the charity of the person receiving the apology.

I have no charity for Skerry --- and I wouldn't expect Mary Cheney does either.

Edwards and Skerry raise this only to de-mobilize the anti-homosexual voter .... but I trust that even those Christians who could be identified as rabid haters of homosexuality know (1) we are all imperfect and all fall short of the kingdom of God (2) we are to love one another even while hating our sins (regardless of what that sin may be).


Frankly IMHO it is a cheap shot that deserves to backfire on them.


Last edited by jataylor11 on Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kmudd
Master Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 825

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chance wrote:
I had one of those "light bulb" moments this morning. Wonder if it's possible that Kerry's remark about Cheney's daughter was calculated? Now he can go on TV and apologize and have everyone say what a kind, caring man he is. Also would make him come across as having admitted to making a "mistake".


Since Edwards also brought up Cheny's daughter it must have been a plan to bring her up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rdtf
CNO


Joined: 13 May 2004
Posts: 2209
Location: BUSHville

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kmudd wrote:
Chance wrote:
I had one of those "light bulb" moments this morning. Wonder if it's possible that Kerry's remark about Cheney's daughter was calculated? Now he can go on TV and apologize and have everyone say what a kind, caring man he is. Also would make him come across as having admitted to making a "mistake".


Since Edwards also brought up Cheny's daughter it must have been a plan to bring her up.


Sure it's a plan - last resort of desperation plan. A no win fumble that was bad the first time they did it. All Lesbians that thought they were gonna vote for him felt the passive aggressive sting too and were offended.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joeshero
Commander


Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 321
Location: Midwest

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chance wrote:
I had one of those "light bulb" moments this morning. Wonder if it's possible that Kerry's remark about Cheney's daughter was calculated? Now he can go on TV and apologize and have everyone say what a kind, caring man he is. Also would make him come across as having admitted to making a "mistake".



That's quite possible, but they have repeated it twice in the VP debate and last night. In my opinion, they want to make a case that "how dare you are against gay marriage when you also have a les daugthter. You don't have compassion as you often proudly claim". In other words, you are hypocrite, that's what they want to say. But I could be wrong.
_________________
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steve Z
Rear Admiral


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 687
Location: West Hartford CT

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 3:05 pm    Post subject: Kerry remark about Mary Cheney Reply with quote

I was browsing the "Comments" section on the RealClearPolitics.com site after the debate. Most commenters thought that Bush won the debate, but I was particularly struck by the comments of three gay posters who were outraged by Kerry's mentioning of Cheney's lesbian daughter that they are changing their votes from Kerry to either Bush or Nader.

Kerry might have committed a major blunder there. Edwards might have gotten away with it, because he was debating Cheney, whose own daughter is lesbian, but Kerry was debating Bush, who does not have any gays in his family. After all, Bush had just said that he "didn't know" whether homosexuality is a choice, that we should be "tolerant" to homosexuals, but "respect the sanctity of marriage as a man and a woman" on principle, and favored a Constitutional Amendment so that JUDGES don't re-define marriage.

It seemed like Kerry had rehearsed a rebuttal for something Kerry anticipated Bush would say, which Bush never said, and it came across a tasteless and gratuitous personal attack. E. D. Hill was really grilling a Kerry spokeswoman about this on Fox&Friends, this morning, and she sounded outraged!

Kerry also said about Mary Cheney:

"And I think if you were to talk to Dick Cheney's daughter, who is a lesbian, she would tell you that she's being who she was, she's being who she was born as."

Has Kerry actually asked Mary Cheney whether she thinks she was BORN lesbian, or whether she became that way by choice? Is it possible that Mary Cheney chose to be a lesbian, but chooses NOT to "marry" her partner?

Kerry also blundered further by bringing God into it:

"And I've met wives who are supportive of their husbands or vice versa when they finally sort of broke out and allowed themselves to live who they were, who they felt God had made them."

People of faith will read in the Bible that "God created them male and female", and wonder how Kerry managed to change God's mind. But then again, Edwards can make the lame walk... But at least Bush acknowledges that God is a "higher power" than himself, and "prays for wisdom" whereas Kerry and Edwards believe themselves to know God's will.
_________________
The traitor will crater!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
noc
PO1


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 492
Location: Dublin, CA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought this little tidbit was interesting from Fred Barnes article:

Now here's a strange twist on the debate. Bush was the winner in a focus group of uncommitted voters conducted by pollster Frank Luntz last night. The 23 voters thought Kerry, not Bush, won the debate. But they split 17 to 5 in favor of Bush on whom they now plan to vote for (one will vote Libertarian). "They still don't trust what John Kerry is saying," Luntz said, though they thought he said it well.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/778kctvv.asp?pg=1

So the question is NOT who won the debate, but who are you now voting for? This is what makes Bush the hands down winner last night.

I'm surprised more people haven't mentioned the immigration question. I was glad to hear Bush say that he would not support amnesty for illegals. Kerry tried to dodge the whole question. I think this is still a very important issue for many voters. Too bad it has become another third rail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul R.
PO3


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 273
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 3:58 pm    Post subject: Kerry authority? Reply with quote

Fox had on a couple libs this morning. I didn't catch their names, one was from WaPo. Said people would think Bush was more of a straight talker, but Kerry more of an intellectual authority, and people would go for Kerry based on that sort of "authority" / "command presence" / "in control".

OMG, if that is true the country is doomed. But, these jokers thought Reagan was dumb, too. Not to mention that to at least one non-politically oriented person (my wife), Kerry comes off as pompous and arrogant.

Luckily for our country, most people don't think like intellectual snobs from WAPO & NYT!!! (I hope!)

Too bad people can't see a clip I saw of Bush a while back where they are supposed to be leaving some place and he says to Dick Cheney: (paraphrasal) "C'mon Vice, let's go." Not irritated, not arrogant... just... commanding. I can see why most of the military / ex-military like Bush, even though I'm not military myself.
_________________
Paul R.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
homesteader
PO3


Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 294
Location: wisconsin

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have been totally out of the loop since just before the debate. I have not read this thread yet but see the total "but"s. Round me up to $50.00. It is on its way.

Thanks all for the prayer and great commentary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
susanlprince
Ensign


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 50
Location: Humboldt, TN (Memphis Region)

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:25 pm    Post subject: "I am a Catholic" Reply with quote

Quote:
“I was taught -- I went to a church school and I was taught that the two greatest commandments are: Love the Lord, your God, with all your mind, your body and your soul, and love your neighbor as yourself. And frankly, I think we have a lot more loving of our neighbor to do in this country and on this planet.”


John Kerry said “I was an altar boy” and “I am a Catholic” and made sure to point these facts out during the debate(s). Hey, that’s great, I respect that.

He was taught the two greatest commandments, but his “quote” from scripture has me thinking he must have skipped class that day. (He must have started that missing votes thing early!) The actual scripture he attempted to quote was

Matthew 22:37
Jesus replied: " 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.',


or Mark 12:30
Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.,

and most likely Luke 10:27
He answered: " 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind' and, 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'

These were the teachings of Jesus and based on the Old Testament scripture Deuteronomy 6
5 Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.”

Now, many people are going to be impressed that he is able to “quote” scripture without even checking to see if what he says is real. That is the danger of this whole election. He says so many wrong things and He even misquotes the Bible! And people aren’t even noticing! I’m scared because I wonder if people even care!? I find it interesting that in his misquote of the scripture, John Kerry left out the word “heart”. You see, God looks into the heart of man. He judges the heart. Man looks at the outside and makes judgements, but God knows the heart. It is very interesting to me that John Kerry replaced the word “heart” with “body” in his misquote. I wonder where is John Kerry’s heart?

I do agree that we do need to “have a lot more loving of our neighbors in this country and on this planet”, but even his Catholic upbringing should have taught him to hate sin. Sin is evil. Terrorism and terrorists are evil. Terrorists and those that harbor/enable them are NOT “neighbors”!

Later on in the debates Kerry said:

Quote:
“My faith affects everything that I do, in truth. There's a great passage of the Bible that says, "What does it mean, my brother, to say you have faith if there are no deeds? Faith without works is dead."

And I think that everything you do in public life has to be guided by your faith, affected by your faith, but without transferring it in any official way to other people.

That's why I fight against poverty. That's why I fight to clean up the environment and protect this earth.

That's why I fight for equality and justice. All of those things come out of that fundamental teaching and belief of faith.

But I know this, that President Kennedy in his inaugural address told all of us that here on Earth, God's work must truly be our own. And that's what we have to — I think that's the test of public service.”


This scripture reference was taken slightly out of context so Kerry could say that the reason he does his good deeds “fight against poverty, clean up the environment, protect the earth, fight for equality and justice” is because the Bible says to. The scripture reference though is explaining that deeds will happen out of true faith, not that deeds prove faith and/or warrant salvation.

James 2:14-24 "What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save him? Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to him, "Go, I wish you well; keep warm and well fed," but does nothing about his physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.”

Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.

You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that–and shudder.

You foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless ? Was not our ancestor Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. And the scripture was fulfilled that says, "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness," and he was called God's friend. You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone.


I find it so incredible that John Kerry uses this scripture in the debate last night shortly after he gave his position on abortion. Amazing, he can’t respect a human life enough to save it from abortion, but he fights to “protect the earth”. He can’t claim to live Biblically on one hand, and then spit in the face of it the next. There is no either/or!

I’m struck by the way he explains “transferring it in any official way to other people” part of his little speech, because actually the Bible, if practiced, promotes transferring your faith! It teaches to:

Mark 16:15
He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation.

1 Peter 3:15
… Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,

I am a Christian and I love America. I feel very blessed to live in a country that does allow freedom to worship. I totally agree with President Bush when he said last night “But I'm mindful in a free society that people can worship if they want to or not. You're equally an American if you choose to worship an almighty and if you choose not to. If you're a Christian, Jew or Muslim, you're equally an American. That's the great thing about America, is the right to worship the way you see fit.”

Who knows who John Kerry worships. His belief/deeds do not even reflect consistency in that department either. I just felt I had to comment on how easy it is for John Kerry to go unchallenged on a lot of what he says throughout this campaign. I don’t know what bothers me more, that John Kerry is even allowed to run for president, given his lying and treasonous history, or the fact that there are so many people that I share this country with that would actually vote for him. It is so disturbing to me, and I actually feel like it is spiritual warfare!

Please pray for these candidates and our country!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Anker-Klanker
Admiral


Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 1033
Location: Richardson, TX

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
...but Kerry more of an intellectual authority, and people would go for Kerry based on that sort of "authority" / "command presence" / "in control".


Remember the liberal left looks up to, respects, and, in fact, is in awe of the image of an Elitist. They think that being led by a "common man" is unsophisticated, not suave, (and dare I say) not French.

The above very simple distinction is what this election is really all about. Almost everyone in the MSM subscribes to the Elitist worship society.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
neverforget
Vice Admiral


Joined: 18 Jul 2004
Posts: 875

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I respect nothing, and I mean nothing, Kerry says, nor will I ever. His eyes and face had the look of an evil snake when he started to talk about the Cheney's daughter. Other times, he just looked like an evil liar.
_________________
US Army Security Agency
1965-1971
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul R.
PO3


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 273
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A-K,

Quote:
The above very simple distinction is what this election is really all about. Almost everyone in the MSM subscribes to the Elitist worship society.


I assume what I wrote is what you mean by simple distinction:

Quote:
people would think Bush was more of a straight talker, but Kerry more of an intellectual authority


True enough. The problem is, the people who are swayed by the MSM, and, the typical People Magazine reader / daytime TV watcher. Lotta votes there...

Kerry makes a really big deal out of "trust me". Ive always thought that was a red flag! A truly trustworthy person does not need to say it loudly.
_________________
Paul R.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul R.
PO3


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 273
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya' know... this might be a good e-mail to send to friends you think might be undecided.

Election rule #1:

Which candidate says "trust me" the most loudly?

Vote for the other guy.

_________________
Paul R.


Last edited by Paul R. on Thu Oct 14, 2004 5:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmackto
Rear Admiral


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 719
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 4:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmackto wrote:
Quote:
PLEDGES

reconflyer - random un-famous person by name - $5.00 (think Billy Bob) (a group of native americans gave him a blessing?)
reconflyer - WEALTHIEST - $0.25 (4x.25=1.00)
ArmyMedicsMom - BUT - $0.50 (she's either very brave, very rich or slightly nuts) 79x.50=39.50
RMalloy - drugs from Canada - $2.00
RMalloy - MIDDLE CLASS - $2.00
RMalloy - 40,000 more troops - $5.00
shadowy - for every friendly country, class or religious group JK disses - $5.00
shadowy - for every non-friendly he appeases - $5.00
shadowy - if he disses the military - $20.00


Quote:

Cash Totals

Tacan70UDN $ 50.00
scot 250.00
Rdtf 25.00
jim_nyc 50.00
Nomorelies 50.00
CTW 250.00
1991932 120.00
richnlori2000 25.00
jerake 50.00
Daniel J. Hutchinson 50.00
oanakat 100.00
geo 20.00
frigatesailor 150.00
Dingbat 50.00
ashter 50.00
ord33 50.00
Melissa 50.00
Dmackto 10.00
hleone 50.00
fastrock 100.00
mckmz 25.00
Kathy Kay 50.00
jataylor11 100.00
Jack Mclaughlin 250.00
homesteader 50.00


SubTotal: $ 2,000.00 ::bounce::


We made 2,000!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 30, 31, 32, 33  Next
Page 31 of 33

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group