SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

TANG Memo on Bush
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 50, 51, 52 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ASPG: I signed the petition for myself and 2 other family members. Also, I opened a new topic under Geedunk so this petition would have a separate line under. I think the FEC can do something on this although they are a bipartisan (5 reps. 5 dems) I don't know if they can act on anything but if they get enough letters they will have to act.
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lrb111
Captain


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 508

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ASPB wrote:
http://www.boycottcbs.com/

Take a look at the site which is Boycott CBS.com Think about joining the effort.

Tom


That was an easy decision... Very Happy
_________________
said Democratic Chairman Terry McAuliffe. "It is inexcusable to mock service and sacrifice."
well, when even the DNC can see it,,,,, then kerry is toast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chuck Z Ombie AC2000
LCDR


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 426
Location: Northern New Jersey

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya know what might really sink CBS is another forged document from a previous show unrelated to Bush. Too bad nobody watches Shifty Minutes to catch other hoaxes.
_________________
John Kerry, R.I.P. (Rot In Paris)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skypilot
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 82
Location: Eastern PA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One More CBS Document Example

Here is an animated GIF, alternating between the PDF version of the Microsoft Word document I created, and the CBS News “original.”













http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?archive=092004&PHPSESSID=40c937eef8c3d77134f6e157f1dcaef4
_________________
Please Mr. Kerry Sign Form #180 Now!
Let the truth set you free? NOT!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 12:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a great animated gif showing the fraudulent document and one created on MS Word. It's on powerlineblog.com


_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Skypilot: Sorry, I didn't see your post directly above mine. Mine is showing animated and yours is not. Do you want me to remove mine so you can fix yours and it will not be a duplicate? (BTY, it's terrific)

I copied it from powerline using the "copy image location" mouse click and then when I pasted it into the document I clicked the Img button above before and after pasting the image.
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cipher
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 902

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Skypilot: Sorry, I didn't see your post directly above mine. Mine is showing animated and yours is not. Do you want me to remove mine so you can fix yours and it will not be a duplicate? (BTY, it's terrific)


Both showed animated for me. But, then again, I'm on Firefox, which is a whole lot more fault tolerant than MSIE.
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TEWSPilot
Admiral


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 1235
Location: Kansas (Transplanted Texan)

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm also using Mozilla Firefox and can see both images animated.

I guess we can look for more "memos" ordering Bush to sign up with a Boston-area unit when he left his Texas unit in 1973 to attend Harvard Business School. The Boston Globe is running that story and says Mr. Bush never signed up with a Boston unit. (maybe it was because he had finished his commitment, but someone else can verify that if that is the case.)

...funny, every time I was sent somewhere, I got ORDERS, not "memos"....details, details.....
_________________
Find the perfect babysitter, petsitter, or tutor -- today!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cipher
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 902

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I guess we can look for more "memos" ordering Bush to sign up with a Boston-area unit when he left his Texas unit in 1973 to attend Harvard Business School. The Boston Globe is running that story and says Mr. Bush never signed up with a Boston unit. (maybe it was because he had finished his commitment, but someone else can verify that if that is the case.)


Since he already had completed all his hours for the entire year -- and actually completed enough hours in 5-1/2 years to equate to 15 *years* of NG service, they probably granted him an early out. All he'd be doing is flying a desk, and with the war winding down, and RIFs in the works, I'm sure they wouldn't insist he report to Boston. No sense in it.
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's go back to Feb. 2004 when Dan Rather promised he had not gotten to the bottom of GWB's TANG service and wanted more documents about his time in the Alabama Guard. Start reading at this website and you can see that Dan Rather has had it out for Bush for a long, long time:

http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2004/cyb20040211.asp
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And interesting take from the Latino side:

Quote:
The Sliming of the President

By Raoul Lowery Contreras

The brawl among Washington reporters and President Bush has reached new lows with the constant sliming by sleazy partisan non—veteran reporters on the President’s honorable service as a Texas Air National Guard officer.

This question is of paramount importance among Hispanics because military service ranks so high among this, the fastest growing segment of the American population and a segment that, among combat arms units, has a higher percentage of troopers than their share of the population, according to Department of Defense information.

Recalling that Hispanics gave President Bush an 89% approval rating, higher in fact than among other Americans, after the attack of September 11th, Hispanics need to know whether allegations by Democratic operatives about the President are true or not. Did President Bush serve well in the Texas Air National Guard, yes, or no?


Read the entire article at: http://www.voznuestra.com/PoliticalWires/_2004/_February/15
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is another clue I just dredge out of the net

Quote:
The re-examination of Bush's records by the Globe, along with interviews with military specialists who have reviewed regulations from that era, show Bush's attendance at required training drills was so irregular his superiors could have disciplined him or ordered him to active duty in 1972, 1973 or 1974. But they did neither. In fact, Bush's unit certified in late 1973 that his service had been "satisfactory" -- just four months after Bush's commanding officer wrote that Bush had not been seen at his unit for the previous 12 months.


Could the phonied up documents be the handiwork of these people at the Boston Globe? Interesting tidbit from the following address:

http://www.thesakeofargument.com/archives/000789.html
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cipher
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 902

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Recalling that Hispanics gave President Bush an 89% approval rating, higher in fact than among other Americans, after the attack of September 11th, Hispanics need to know whether allegations by Democratic operatives about the President are true or not. Did President Bush serve well in the Texas Air National Guard, yes, or no?


Actually, the question SHOULD be "Did President Bush serve well as Commander in Chief the last three years, yes, or no?"

To my mind, the very fact that President Bush does NOT hammer on his military service (which I may remind you, less than 3% of the American popluation EVER serves in ANY military branch), speaks louder than words. The words "Honorable Discharge" are more than sufficient to answer the first question, and his deeds and actions of his term in office more than sufficient to answer the second.
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
integritycounts
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 667

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote





Last edited by integritycounts on Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nomorelies
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 977
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

More background from the net:

Quote:
National Guard Watch

Some catching up on the last week's news:

On Saturday, as Bradley Graham wrote in The Washington Post: "The Pentagon announced yesterday that it had found payroll records related to President Bush's time in the National Guard -- records that earlier this month were reported accidentally destroyed -- but the discovery did nothing to resolve the dispute over Bush's military service in 1972 and 1973."

The Pentagon said it had inadvertently announced that the records had been inadvertently destroyed.

As blogger Kevin Drum put it: "That's a lot of inadvertent-ness."

We're still waiting for what could be the mother-lode of documents: Microfilm of all Bush's personnel records with the Texas Air National Guard. The Associated Press is suing for access.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27212-2004Jul30.html
_________________
Nomorelies Make a donation HERE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 50, 51, 52 ... 65, 66, 67  Next
Page 51 of 67

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group