 |
SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
LewWaters
Admin
Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:47 am Post subject: Journalists At War |
 |
|
While reading various stories online tonight, I ran across the following article at National Review Online. That any team of Journalists would committ this act appals me.
| Quote: | Journalism at War
Let’s not return to the days.
June 15, 2004, 8:42 a.m.
Mackubin Thomas Owen for National Review Online
A year ago, the Pentagon took what many people considered to be a giant risk when it embedded reporters with U.S. units during the march to Baghdad. Old-timers remembered the acrimonious depths to which military-media relations had fallen in the aftermath of Vietnam. The fact was that for a very long time after that conflict, military members believed in their hearts that reporters were part of the counter-culture trying to "get them." Accordingly, the military limited press access to battlefields for over two decades.
The embedding experiment worked — at least for a while. Unfortunately, the media seem to have returned to their old ways. On June 3, U.S. Central Command issued this press release:
COALITION SOLDIERS QUESTION NEWS MEDIA FOLLOWING ROADSIDE BOMB
MOSUL, Iraq - Coalition soldiers questioned two news media cameramen and a reporter after a roadside bomb exploded near a Coalition convoy two kilometers north of Mosul June 3.
The media, who were at the scene prior to the attack, told soldiers at the scene they had received a tip to be at that location prior to the attack and they had witnessed the explosion.
There was minimal damage to a Coalition vehicle, a cracked windshield, and no serious injuries.
3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division soldiers requested the media accompany them to a base camp in Mosul to answer questions as witnesses to the incident. The news media representatives left the base camp in the mid afternoon.
This report brings to mind an episode that took place some years ago in the aftermath of Vietnam and went a long way toward cementing the military's negative image of the press. In his book, The Military and the Media, William Kennedy describes this revealing exchange during a military-media symposium:
The moderator of a panel that included Peter Jennings of ABC News, Mike Wallace of CBS, and Marine Colonel George Connell, offered a hypothetical scenario: In wartime, you are invited to accompany an enemy unit that says it will prove that an ally of the United States is committing atrocities. While accompanying the enemy patrol, you find yourself in the midst of preparations for an ambush that may very well cause the death of Americans. Do you try to warn the Americans?
After hesitating, Jennings replied that he would try to warn the Americans. But Wallace responded that he would regard it as just another story and that he would not feel a "higher duty" to warn the Americans. Col. Connell watched this exchange in what can only be described as a cold rage. When asked to comment, Col. Connell said of Wallace, "I feel utter contempt. Two days later those same two journalists [could be] caught in an ambush and are lying 200 yards from my position, and they expect that I'm going to send Marines to get them. They're not Americans. They're just journalists."
I hope we don't go back to this. After the advances in military-media relations achieved by the Pentagon's embedding program, it would be a pity to return to the bad old days of animosity and mistrust. |
While not identifying who the Journalists were or what media they represented, I have to wonder if this is the same media types that are lauding praise after praise on John "F"in Kerry. Just knowing that some reporters would have prior knowledge of an impending ambush and their only concern is to get there to film the possible deaths of more Americans angers me more than I can explain. I thnk some of you can understand this.
I'm all for freedom of the press, but a little responsibility would be a welcome change. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GoophyDog
PO1
Joined: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 480
Location: Washington - The Evergreen State
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Please, if anyone can find out which media outlet it was, post it here. All I've been able to find is the short blurb from CentCom that is quoted. I've got family serving there and I'm mad as hell.
_________________
Why ask? Because it needs asking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LewWaters
Admin
Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
What makes me even madder is that this report came out June 3 this year and we haven't heard a word from mainstream media about it, the same ones that couldn't wait to identify the ones committing the wrongful acts in Abu Ghraib prison. In fact, I haven't even heard about it on Foxnews either.
I did send a copy of that article to both Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and will now wait and see if they ever mention it.
I searched for more info on it too, but only found mentions in blogs. Speculation is that they were either Al Jazeera or maybe Reuters. If I discover it was an American media outlet, I am going to call for an immediate boycott of all their sources.
As far as I'm concerned, this team committed treason as much as Kerry did long ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scott
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 1603
Location: Massachusetts
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2004 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I moved this post to a new thread entitled "Know your enemy...".
Scott
_________________
Bye bye, Boston Straggler!
Last edited by Scott on Sun Jun 20, 2004 8:02 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
