SwiftVets.com

MissouriVeteransDaughter

Today the Senate confirmed a new CIA Director, a matter which would seem to be of some importance ...Kerry and Edwards were two of the three Democrats not there. Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't it just a few weeks ago that Kerry was blustering and demanding that President Bush IMMEDIATELY enact all the recommendations of the 9-11 Commission? Then today he can't even adjust his schedule so he could be in Washington and cast a vote on a matter which might help ensure our National Security??? I know he would have voted against the confirmation of Mr. Goss, (as Mr. Goss is President Bush's choice for the job) but he still should have been there!
_________________
"Lord...Who may live on your holy hill? He whose walk is blameless and who does what is righteous, who speaks the truth from his heart and has no slander on his tongue, who does his neighbor no wrong and casts no slur on his fellowman" Ps15:1-3.

Guest · Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 7:02 am Post subject:

Kerry has missed so many things these past months in the senate. He is so selfish that he did not give up his senate seat to run for pres because he is afraid if he looses, he won't be electable in Mass. as senator.

But think about the fact that the twenty years he has been on the "Hill", not one bill passed with his name on it.

That man is unfit for command.

eXcel · Seaman Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 174

you cant seriously expect him to be there now. Of course he should be hammered for not being there when he was supposed to be. Especially the senate intelligence meetings. They need to just release the attendance records wether he wants them released or not. Can't we get that with a Freedom of Information request?

Fort Campbell · Vice Admiral Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 896

Kerry has not been there for the past year. JMO but if a Senator wishes to run for President he should resign his Senate seat. There is no way that one person can do both things adequately.