SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why are Victims Our Only War Heroes?

 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ASPB
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1680

PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 3:35 am    Post subject: Why are Victims Our Only War Heroes? Reply with quote

A hero is no braver than an ordinary man,
but he is braver five minutes longer.
—Ralph Waldo Emerson

We are at war. Our enemy, the terrorist, knows he cannot win militarily, certainly not in terms of manpower or weaponry, so he somehow must get us to back down—wear us down and diminish our resolve. He hopes to do that through images and perceptions. The ultimate battle of the global war on terrorism will be fought in the hearts and minds of Americans.

We must make a concerted, deliberate effort to counterbalance the terrorists’ tactic. Thus far, we have overlooked perhaps the most important image in our arsenal, that of the hero in war, and of his or her determination. It is an image we have failed to present adequately in our prosecution of this war. In earlier times, the American public could recite names such as Boatswain’s Mate Reuben James, Lieutenant William Cushing, Colonel Joshua Chamberlain, Sergeant Alvin York, Mess Attendant Dorie Miller, and Sergeant Audie Murphy as easily as they could their own home addresses. The individual heroes of the armed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, however, generally are unknown. Deluged by lengthy, detailed stories of the extreme efforts taken by terrorists, we have heard little of the extreme efforts taken by members of the U.S. armed forces.

We help our enemies by default, by allowing lesser images to be presented as substitutes. Everyone knows the name Jessica Lynch. She wore her country’s uniform, went willingly to her duty in Iraq, and suffered grievous injuries, but does she qualify to be known first among those who served in this war? We have brushed aside battlefield resolution and action—which should be foremost—and allowed the image of victimization and suffering to take its place.

For some today, the only image they know is of U.S. servicemen and women as victims. That is not right. It cannot continue. Worse still, we risk having our children’s perception become that signing up to serve is signing up to become a victim.

Battlefield heroes do not make the front pages anymore. Perhaps there is some policy that fears the glorification of violence; violence is never productive, therefore, no violence should be glorified. Well, wars are violent. Individual and self-defense are violent. War heroes are violent. Bravery in battle frequently requires violent acts.
Violence is not inherently bad. Heroes in war must be prepared to be violent.

Another factor surely at work is that victims are easier to identify and celebrate than heroes. They are less controversial. They inspire sympathy. They can be identified using fairly objective standards. It is their status rather than their acts or intentions that define them. Clearly, we need to know their stories, but we should give greater attention to the heroes of war. Substituting victims for heroes, the media have cheapened the concept of heroism. They have sent it into obscurity.
Psychology Was the Death of Courage . . .

. . . and of persistence, endurance, and that whole set of virtues that comprise our moral value system. If, as Freud would assert, will is an illusion and all behavior is causally determined, it is illogical to admire moral attributes. It has become the fashion of the age to believe there is no such thing as a hero.

Perhaps it also is the whipsaw approach of 24-hour news coverage struggling to maintain ratings. No sooner do the media show an admirable act than the next day’s feature points out the central performer have feet of clay. It may be our fear that no one can withstand today’s scrutiny.

Heroes are human beings, and as humans they will be flawed. That, however, is not sufficient reason to allow heroes to be overlooked. It is only a reason to be sure there is quality control in their recognition. That quality control must focus only on the heroic act, however, not on lifetime personal decorum.

There may be another more disturbing aspect to the disappearance of heroes. Heroism, by definition, implies a superior quality for a moment in time. A hero, therefore, is a superior individual by virtue of superior conduct, and the politically correct will not countenance that. No one is superior to anyone else, nothing is better than anything else, no cause is greater than any other. The United States is not exceptional, nor are U.S. causes. Victims, on the other hand, are perfectly politically correct.

By our focus on victimization, we have adopted our enemies’ standard of measure, and are handing them a victory. As Charles Krauthammer noted in the 8 December 2003 issue of Time, “That is the enemy’s entire war objective: to inflict pain. And that is why it would be a strategic error to amplify and broadcast that pain by making great shows of sorrow presided over by the President himself. In the midst of an ongoing war, a guerrilla war, a war that will be won and lost as a contest of wills, the Commander in Chief—despite what he feels in his heart—must not permit himself to show that he bleeds.”

When Did It All Start?

The end of the Vietnam War generated a peculiar hybrid—the victim-hero. That conflict had so rent the fabric of America that battlefield heroes were ignored or actively disparaged. The returning prisoners of war (POWs), however, were something different. They were unequivocal victims, many of whom had resisted their captors heroically with the little means they had at hand. There were no issues of collateral damage or innocent lives lost in their stories of captivity. Most Americans who lived during that period still can recite the names of one or two POWs. Far fewer can name a single Vietnam battlefield hero.

On the release of the POWs, the U.S. military made a concerted effort to ensure the POWs were cared for and protected. Perhaps because this was the closing chapter of the war, the U.S. military expended considerable effort in ensuring that their stories were properly told. These were non-controversial stories of great resolve. Contemporaneous stories of battlefield heroism were never accorded the same priority.

Was it at this point that we began our descent on the slippery slope of “safe” heroes, heroes whose conduct was largely nonviolent, played out off the battlefield? Was it at this point we began to abandon warriors performing warrior like acts as our model?

We need heroes. We have heroes. We cannot afford to overlook them.
The global war on terrorism will pivot on the resolve of the American public. The resolve of the American public will pivot on what is held up as worthy—about itself and those who fight for it. The images we use to tell the story will help America find its way through this conflict.

Several Navy Crosses, Distinguished Service Crosses, and Air Force Crosses have been awarded since 11 September 2001 as part of the global war on terrorism. The processing of Medals of Honor, of course, takes longer. Yet, it is difficult to find these citations anywhere. Chief Stephen Bass was awarded the Navy Cross for heroism in Afghanistan, and understanding that aspects of his service still are highly classified, no abbreviated and unclassified version of his citation is readily obtainable. The Department of Defense does not maintain an Internet site for new recipients of senior awards for valor. If the personal security of the servicemembers is a concern, then the citations still should be released using noms de guerre.

We cannot let the terrorists control the images and perceptions that govern our decisions. We must not forfeit the high ground. This conflict should not be defined exclusively by the images of victims. This is a war of resolve. We must recognize and draw inspiration from those who have demonstrated resolve.

Captain Crossland is a SEAL reserve officer who was mobilized for duty in Southwest and Central Asia as part of Operation Enduring Freedom in 2002. In civilian life, he is a trial lawyer with offices in Stratford, Connecticut.
_________________
On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
LewWaters
Admin


Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 4:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Funny, I just finished watching Yankee Doodle Dandy, the 1942 film by James Cagney about George M. Cohan, writer of the songs "Over there" and "Grand Old Flag." I commented to my soon to be wife that that is what is missing today, patrotism and support for our traditional values and ethics.

It seems, ever since Vietnam, there were no heroes, only victims. It's almost fashionable today for everyone to cry victim, no matter what over. Look at Jessica Lynch. She was portrayed as a victim of Bush's policies, not a hero, even though the early unconfirmed reports of her capture were thought to be her going down fighting. It was later corrected to who it really was and even he was found out to have been captured and later murdered in captivity. But still, he is not considered a hero by the public, only a another victim.

Much of this I lay at the feet of both mainsewer media and hollyweird. Out of their hatred for Bush and conservatives, they will do everything they can to make our real heros seem more like vicitms accomplishing nothing.

To me, each and everyone of them over there today is a hero, regardless of what their job was. Seeing the concept of duty and honor hasn't died along with much of the rest of our society makes me very proud of all of them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coldwarvet
Admiral


Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 1125
Location: Minnetonka, MN

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps we should begin a new post for Hero stories. I found this one on the net after I read your article.

Iraq
Building may be named for Iraq hero
A bill now before the Congress would make the Holiday post office the "Sergeant First Class Paul Ray Smith Post Office Building."
By ALEX LEARY, Times Staff Writer
Published June 19, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


HOLIDAY - Sgt. 1st Class Paul Ray Smith's name already adorns an Army research building in Orlando and a street sign at MacDill Air Force Base. U.S. Rep. Mike Bilirakis wants to bring his memory closer to home.

Stirred by the fallen soldier's actions in Iraq, Bilirakis has introduced a bill to rename the Holiday post office after him, placing a memorial in the community Smith's widow now calls her own.

"I'm overwhelmed by this honor. It means so much to me to know people are still thinking of him," Birgit Smith said Friday.

"Just the fact that he's been nominated for the Medal of Honor is reason enough to do this," Bilirakis said. "He's a true American hero."

Smith died April 4, 2003, while helping ward off 100 or more Iraqi soldiers from his band of about 16 Army combat engineers outside Saddam International Airport. As his men scrambled to safety, the 33-year-old Smith manned a .50-caliber machine gun atop an armored personnel carrier and started firing.

The men, three of whom were injured, made it out of the courtyard where they had been preparing a place to hold prisoners of war. But Smith, who grew up in Tampa's Palma Ceia neighborhood, was shot in the head and killed.

Smith's superiors say the valor he displayed is worthy of the military's highest award, the Medal of Honor. Though the vetting process is secret, the nomination is believed still to be under consideration.

"His story really struck me," Bilirakis said, speaking by telephone from Washington, where he was awaiting a vote on an amendment to the Homeland Security appropriation.

The Tarpon Springs Republican expects his bill, which is co-sponsored by the rest of the Florida Congressional delegation, will be voted on by July. Companion legislation should reach the Senate about the same time, he said.

Bilirakis wants to officially unveil the "Sergeant First Class Paul Ray Smith Post Office Building" in September. The building is located at 4737 Mile Stretch Drive, not far from the house Birgit Smith shares with her 17-year-old daughter Jessica and 10-year-old son David.

"Every day people who go by will know what their freedom means," said Smith's mother, Janice Pvirre, who lives in New Port Richey. "They are going to know he fought for them."

- Alex Leary can be reached in west Pasco at 869-6247, or toll-free at 1-800-333-7505, ext. 6247. His e-mail address is leary@sptimes.com

TO LEARN MORE
To learn more about Paul Smith's story and see pictures of his family and the soldiers he fought with in Iraq, visit www.sptimes.com/paulsmith

[Last modified June 18, 2004, 23:55:17]
_________________
Defender of the honor of those in harms way keeping us out of harms way.

"Peace is our Profession"
Strategic Air Command - Motto

USAF 75-79 Security Police
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group