SwiftVets.com

[Otis]

This morning on the radio a caller pointed out that Kerry criticizes Bush for not micro-managing everything going on in Iraq. According to Kerry Bush should have had his hand in everything the military did or has done. Instead Bush, the dummy, simply told the military what he expected and then let them do it. What sort of commander in chief is that? It's as if he thinks Bush should be more like LBJ micro-managing the Vietnam war. I guess this is the lesson Kerry learned from the Vietnam war. The president should micro-manage the war.
_________________
"It is not a smear, if you please, if you point out the record of your opponent."
-Murray Chotiner-

[Steve Z]

There was a wartime head of state who wanted to micro-manage everything in his military campaigns, who forbade his generals from making any strategic decision without his consent. Frequently, the generals found themselves stranded and short of materiel or troops at critical times during the war, and could not reach their head of state for permission to change strategy. They eventually lost the war, and the head of state died in disgrace.

This head of state was Adolf Hitler, and the rest of the world is thankful for his micro-managing the war into defeat!

But America does not need such a head of state!
_________________
The traitor will crater!

[Otis]

Yes.

Now, knowing what we know of Kerry, does anyone think he would simply let the military do their job or would he micro-manage the war on terror to death? He would be worse than LBJ.
_________________
"It is not a smear, if you please, if you point out the record of your opponent."
-Murray Chotiner-