SwiftVets.com

Jack Mclaughlin · PO3 Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 280

While watching NBC last week in his Maryland home he recognized the " missing exposive site" that was the big story of the week. He was the ordinance officer in charge of removing explosives from the complex he identified as LSA Elms.

At his news conference yesterday he stated that his ordinance unit had hauled away and destroyed approximately 250 tons of explosives and armaments from the complex.

After delivering his detailed account, Barbara Starr, CNN attack dog and Kerry surrogate let everyone in that press room at the Pentagon know that she was not satisfied and demanded more answers. Larry DiRita, Pentagon spokeman, assured her and the rest of the media that this was an important part of the story and more would follow.

Yet, the MSM hardly mentioned this in their nightly coverage. No apologies from Kerry or his MSM surrogates for their demeaning of our military for not guarding or disposing of these explosives.

Both Kerry and the Media showed their contempt and disdain of the American soldier.

redneckvet · Lt.Jg. Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 112 Location: NC

I don't know which is more frustrating, John Kerry or the MSM and their blatant refusal to report the truth.
_________________
"Full Tour Grunt"

srmorton · Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:57 pm Post subject:

I know. It is definitely the MSM because without them Kerry would
alreay be toast. Their refusal to report the truth about him while
spreading all of the lies about W is what is keeping Kerry "afloat".
_________________
Susan R. Morton

GM Strong · Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:41 pm Post subject:

Major Austin Pearson is a WMD for the media and Kerry. This guy was super especially when he descibed the Mass Destruction of Weapons. That place was one huge weapon depot. He nuked Kerry and the MSM. This man is one of our finest and we salute him for a job well done.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69

DaveS · Ensign Joined: 19 Sep 2004 Posts: 61

I actually believe he did not clear up all the questions however I think it is the reporters fault. One question would have sealed it; "did you see any of the cardboard barrels containing a white powder substance during your time in the facility?"

Had this question been asked he could have answered directly. Instead they kept asking if he had seen specific ordinance or explosive material. He stated that he could not answer such a question. Who could? Without testing no one could know what was in the different containers if it was in a raw form.

Questions were weak and intended to extend the story not clear it up.