SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Kerry: To "Swift Boat" is to smear

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:11 pm    Post subject: Kerry: To "Swift Boat" is to smear Reply with quote

This should set well with the "Swift Boat Sailors Association" and Kerry's own "Band of Brothers"... what a disgusting fraud this naval "war hero" is...

Quote:
"I won't stand for the swift-boating of Jack Murtha," Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004, responded Friday.

SF Chronicle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fortdixlover
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 1476

PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:54 am    Post subject: Re: Kerry: To "Swift Boat" is to smear Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
This should set well with the "Swift Boat Sailors Association" and Kerry's own "Band of Brothers"... what a disgusting fraud this naval "war hero" is...

Quote:
"I won't stand for the swift-boating of Jack Murtha," Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004, responded Friday.

SF Chronicle


Kerry is a true narcissistic bastard, bringing up the "I served in Vietnam" bullcrap again:

White House spokesman Scott McClellan charged Murtha with endorsing a "surrender" policy advocated by "extreme" liberals such as filmmaker Michael Moore, regarded in Republican circles as a dangerous radical (yathink? --FDL). That provoked a swift response from Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, last year's defeated Democratic presidential candidate. "It disgusts me that a bunch of guys who have never put on the uniform of their country venomously turn their guns on a Marine who came home from Vietnam with a Bronze Star and two Purple Hearts," he said.

And of course, this: A Kerry spokesman said "he has his own plan" when asked if Kerry agreed with immediate withdrawal.

Woweeeeeee -- YAJFKP! (yet another John F'ing Kerry Plan!)

I believe it's time for the Swift Vets & POW's for Truth to issue a formal response to Mr. Kerry on his use of the "Swift Boats" name.

-- FDL
_________________
"Millions For Defense, Not One Cent For Tribute" - Thomas Jefferson on paying ransom to Muslim corsairs (pirates).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mtboone
Founder


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 470
Location: Kansas City, MO.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 4:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Kerry: To "Swift Boat" is to smear Reply with quote

fortdixlover wrote:
Me#1You#10 wrote:
This should set well with the "Swift Boat Sailors Association" and Kerry's own "Band of Brothers"... what a disgusting fraud this naval "war hero" is...

Quote:
"I won't stand for the swift-boating of Jack Murtha," Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004, responded Friday.

SF Chronicle


Kerry is a true narcissistic bastard, bringing up the "I served in Vietnam" bullcrap again:

White House spokesman Scott McClellan charged Murtha with endorsing a "surrender" policy advocated by "extreme" liberals such as filmmaker Michael Moore, regarded in Republican circles as a dangerous radical (yathink? --FDL). That provoked a swift response from Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, last year's defeated Democratic presidential candidate. "It disgusts me that a bunch of guys who have never put on the uniform of their country venomously turn their guns on a Marine who came home from Vietnam with a Bronze Star and two Purple Hearts," he said.

And of course, this: A Kerry spokesman said "he has his own plan" when asked if Kerry agreed with immediate withdrawal.

Woweeeeeee -- YAJFKP! (yet another John F'ing Kerry Plan!)

I believe it's time for the Swift Vets & POW's for Truth to issue a formal response to Mr. Kerry on his use of the "Swift Boats" name.

-- FDL


I personally love it when he says things like this. It has to cause him great pain to bring up Swift boats and know that his fellow comrades and ship mates think of him in such low esteem and contempt as well as the majority of US citizens.
_________________
Terry Boone PCF 90
Qui Nhon 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rhv5862
PO2


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 379
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2005 7:10 pm    Post subject: Kerry:To "Swift Boat" is to smear Reply with quote

Kerry always has a plan. The problem is only he knows what it is. Never seems to be able to let anyone in on his secerets.

RHV5862
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Doc Farmer
LCDR


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 442
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA

PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:42 am    Post subject: Re: Kerry: To "Swift Boat" is to smear Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
This should set well with the "Swift Boat Sailors Association" and Kerry's own "Band of Brothers"... what a disgusting fraud this naval "war hero" is...

Quote:
"I won't stand for the swift-boating of Jack Murtha," Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004, responded Friday.

SF Chronicle
Ah, I see. So Kerry won't tolerate having the truth told about Murtha, then... Evil or Very Mad
_________________

Fat, Bald and Ugly - And PROUD Of It!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
GM Strong
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 1579
Location: Penna

PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The primary difference between Lurch and Jack Murtha is that there is nothing phony about Murtha's service. Lurch has better hair. Their politics seem to be converging unfortunately.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deuce
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 589
Location: FL

PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Kerry: To "Swift Boat" is to smear Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
This should set well with the "Swift Boat Sailors Association" and Kerry's own "Band of Brothers"... what a disgusting fraud this naval "war hero" is...

Quote:
"I won't stand for the swift-boating of Jack Murtha," Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004, responded Friday.

SF Chronicle
Me#1,
You know, actually I think we all agree w/sKerry on this one....We'd much rather all of us in fact, 'SwiftBoat' sKerry first (ie, toss him out of the Senate and back into the pond he emerged from )...then go after any who wished to follow in his footsteps. JMHO

Deuce
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carpro
Admin


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 1176
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Swiftboating", to me, simply means to get the truth out against all odds. Wink
_________________
"If he believes his 1971 indictment of his country and his fellow veterans was true, then he couldn't possibly be proud of his Vietnam service."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J. Toy
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 96
Location: Pa.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:56 am    Post subject: [size=18]John O'Neill Responds[/size] Reply with quote

http://dickmcdonald.blogspot.com/

Summer Soldiers

BY JOHN O'NEILL
November 21, 2005
URL: http://www.nysun.com/article/23341

Senator Kerry, supposedly defending Rep. John Murtha, said, "I won't stand for the Swift-Boating of Jack Murtha!" As one of the 254 members of Mr. Kerry's unit in Vietnam who belonged to Swift Boat Veterans and POWs for Truth, I found Mr. Kerry's comments most ironic.

To us, Mr. Kerry's comments meant that no one should do to Mr. Murtha that which Mr. Kerry did to all of us and our fellow Vietnam veterans, living and dead. Mr. Kerry's disgraceful comments on many occasions in 1971 (while we were locked in combat), claiming falsely that we were "murdering" hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese and committing rape and mayhem on a daily basis, are a part of the public record for which he has never apologized. This might be called "Kerrying" our soldiers.

In his own strange way, in his recent comments, Mr. Kerry was trying by implication to compare himself to Mr. Murtha - the gravest of insults to Mr. Murtha, who was given a standing ovation by the House of Representatives (which then properly buried his immediate pullout suggestion 403-3). Mr. Murtha's long military record stands in stark contrast with Mr. Kerry's continuous self-promotion of his short and controversial service in our unit. More importantly, Mr. Murtha has never compared our troops in the field - now or then - to the "Army of Genghis Khan" or claimed our adversaries, whether the bloody communists and Khmer Rouge or the butchers of Al Qaeda, were simply democratic reformers. Can anyone - even in the cocoon of Washington or the incestuous world of Mainstream Media - imagine either side of the aisle spontaneously rising to clap for anything that Mr. Kerry ever did or said?

Mr. Murtha's distinguished military record does not mean he is not wildly and completely wrong in his pullout proposal. Despite Mr. Murtha's effort to present himself as speaking for our troops, all serious data is to the contrary. Thus, for example, an Army Times poll of October 3, 2004, found Mr. Bush beating Mr. Kerry among active duty troops by 74% to 18%. Other polls were similar. While there are a few active duty or retired personnel like Mr. Murtha on the pullout side, they are not as numerous as, say, Yankee fans in Boston. It is abundantly clear that the vast majority of military personnel simply wish to be left alone by the Kerrys and other politicians to finish a job which they believe is nearly done and which they know the John Kerrys and Nancy Pelosis of Washington are totally incompetent to direct and even understand.

The Democratic Party (notwithstanding its cynical expressions of concern for the same troops it periodically seeks to label as engaged in widespread crime) is regarded with intense distrust by many active duty and retired military personnel. They have been Kerried once too often. It was once the majority party that stopped the Nazis, Fascists, and North Koreans and that in words of a far different Kennedy summoned us "to fight any battle" for freedom. Sadly, the party of Henry Jackson and Franklin Roosevelt has become the party of retreat - from the Iranian Hostage Crisis to the retreat from Mogadishu; to opposition to the 1991 Gulf War; to the failure to avenge the 1993 World Trade Center bombing or the USS Cole bombing or the murder of our own troops and embassy personnel around the world. Indeed, this past Thursday night, the nation watched the bizarre spectacle of a Democratic Party speaking in favor of immediate withdrawal but too afraid to even cast a vote recording for posterity these convictions. And the drift from American values to the party of Mr. Kerry and Michael Moore has been matched by its shrinking base. Recent polls, for example, show vastly lower approval ratings - in the low 20s - for Congressional Democrats than even the low rating of Mr. Bush. As for many veterans and military personnel, they remember well the politicians who voted to send us to war then "Kerried" us while we were locked in combat, dishonoring both our service and our dead.

And they ask - is this all to happen to our soldiers again? Are the politicians like Mr. Kerry who led the campaign to send our kids to war (when it was popular) now to withdraw support while they are locked in combat and apparently succeeding because the task is difficult or unpopular? Will Mainstream Media "Kerry" our troops by portraying Abu Ghraib or isolated cases of prisoner mistreatment as the rule to demoralize our troops and nation, while ignoring the beheadings and butchery of those peacefully praying in Mosques or shopping in a Bazaar? Will the press's selective glorification of isolated figures such as Cindy Sheehan, Mr. Kerry, or Mr. Murtha drown out the actual voices of the large majority of our servicemen? I hope not. We pay our troops little and subject them to considerable danger. We can at the very least support them with stability of mission and honesty of reporting.

Likewise, we ought not to "Kerry" our troops with after-the-battle second-guessing. The fog of combat produces in any war mistake and folly. Both World War II and the Korean War began with wholly avoidable military disasters - Pearl Harbor and the retreat to Pusan. Likewise, the Iraq War has had its share of mistakes and miscalculations (along with brilliant successes). But it simply Kerries our troops in the field to elevate network newsmen (who have likely never even spent a night in a tent) or self-promoted Congressional military heroes with two months of 35 years ago combat in a much different world into armchair Napoleons. That is why we rely instead upon the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the best professional military establishment in the world (when they are left alone). And we should remember the words of Thomas Dewey declining to make Pearl Harbor a campaign issue in 1944: "I would rather lose the presidency and win the war than the reverse."

On December 23, 1776, with Washington's army freezing in tatters at Morristown, Thomas Paine in "Common Sense" wrote, "These are the times that try men's souls." He noted many mistakes by the American army, but noted that "tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered" and that heaven charges a high price for freedom because it is so precious. It was a time when "the summer soldier and the sunshine patriot shrink ... " but those who stood firm would someday receive the love and appreciation of the nation.

Our nation and our soldiers, who have shown their courage, decency, and worth in desperate fighting on dozens of battlefields, deserve our support for their mission and themselves. They deserve infinitely more than summer soldiers, sunshine patriots, and armchair Napoleons, whose determination and purpose melts with the first winter storm.

Mr. O'Neill, an attorney in Houston, Texas, coauthored the no. 1 bestseller, "Unfit for Command." After graduation from the Naval Academy, he served as a Swift Boat officer in Vietnam, and later, as a law clerk to Justice William Rehnquist.
_________________
Corpsman, 1969-1973
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whoah! J. Toy, thanks for the heads-up!

Great to see John O'Neill responding with his own version of the dictionary game.

Please direct further comments on John's article to the dedicated topic posted by RBShirley.

http://www.swiftvets.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=21223
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
searcher
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 28
Location: Lincolnshire England

PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
That provoked a swift response from Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, last year's defeated Democratic presidential candidate. "It disgusts me that a bunch of guys who have never put on the uniform of their country venomously turn their guns on a Marine who came home from Vietnam with a Bronze Star and two Purple Hearts," he said.


Did he also add...."and was subjected on his homecoming to having bags of dogshit thrown at him, and other indignities at my, and others, instigation"?
_________________
Steve.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group