SwiftVets.com

republicanveteran · Commander Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 333 Location: Texas

He will attack the biased media on the swifties ads.

He will also take our side on the new commercial,

He will destroy the media on this subject

Me#1You#10 · Site Admin Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 6503

O'really?

ccr · Commander Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 325

"That's a legitimate campaign issue." O'Reilly re: the Kerry testimony.
_________________
Whose side is John Kerry really on? Take this quiz and decide for yourself.

http://www.learnthat.com/quiz/

kmudd · Master Chief Petty Officer Joined: 16 Aug 2004 Posts: 825

O"reily has PO me off.He is lying saying we will never know the truth. We know Kerry has lied about Cambodia. He know he was injured by himself on his 1st ph

LewWaters · Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 12:05 am Post subject:

We'll see how much he lets Chris Wallace spin this. Frankly, I've lost all confidence in O'Reilly.
_________________
Clark County Conservative

Navy_Navy_Navy · Admin Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 5777

Is that what you're getting from a promo for tonight's show or something? Because apparently he was all over swifts in his radio show, today.

Or are you just day-dreaming? Wink

_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother

Polaris · Rear Admiral Joined: 16 Aug 2004 Posts: 626

navy_navy_navy,

Perhaps, just perhaps O'Reilly felt intensely uncomfotable talking about military service of any kind...but Kerry's antiwar activities suffer from no excuse. On a less kind note perhaps O'Reilly is looking for a way to get out of the hole he has dug for himself.

We'll see.
_________________
-Polaris

Truth is Beauty

VietnamVetsWife · Seaman Recruit Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 25

Bill and Chris believe the after action reports Rolling Eyes

But at least say he was lyingabout Cambodia! That is the only good thing I heard!

kmudd · Master Chief Petty Officer Joined: 16 Aug 2004 Posts: 825

O'Reilly menntion nothing about Kerry meeting with the VC and the North Vietnamese. To me this is the worse thing Kerry did.

Curt · Lt.Jg. Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 129 Location: Eastern NC

Maybe he was getting his fact straight. Glad to see him stand up.

Curt

manofaiki · Former Member Joined: 15 Aug 2004 Posts: 96

What Bill is saying, and what Chris Wallace is pointing out, is that once you look at hard evidence, i.e.,not he said/he said testimony, all the documentary evidence favors Kerry.

But as Bill pointed out twice, Zumwalt and Elliot were not there, they are taking Kerry's word for it about what happened.

Bill's take is: Kerry served in Vietnam, he's got the medals.......that's the record.

What should, in Bill's mind, be a campaign issue is what Kerry did AFTER he came back from Vietnam, and I believe Bill will be riding that horse for all it's worth.

he doesn't care about the bogus medals and has never pretended otherwise because it can't be PROVEN except by believing one guy over another guy.

What Kerry said and did in his anti-war activity CAN be proven; meetings in Paris and so on.

So I think Bill is giving Kerry a pass on the medals but not on the anti-war hypocrisy and treason.

manofaiki
_________________
"If any man has not the stomach for this fight, let him depart from us.! We would not die in that man's company!"

You bugged out in Vietnam - so we don't need you commanding us in the War on Terror!

So get lost, John Kerry!!!!!

republicanveteran · Commander Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 333 Location: Texas

my point is that he excoriated the liberal media over this, and will probably weigh in on the ant-war antics.

As I have said in other posts, Kerry's treasonous actions are indefensible, I don't believe Oreilly will try to defend it..

Of course, I may be dissapointed. He has certainly dissapointed me over the first ad...

rparrott21 · Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 12:13 am Post subject:

O'reilly said leave his war record alone, but attack on the anti-war stuff...

tvaughan · Seaman Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 182

Chris Wallace does not know this subject.

A judgment call? That third purple heart is not a judgment call of any kind. The first purple heart was a judgment call. And the judgment was to reject it.

Neither Wallace or O'Reilly even know what is in dispute and what is not. NO ONE IS DISPUTING THAT KERRY PULLED RASMUSSEN OUT OF THE WATER.

I am getting really tired of pundits not knowing this subject and still have the nerve to talk about it.

Chris Wallace was terrible choice for "the truth police".
_________________
Talking point #1: Sign 180
Talking point #2: Sign 180
Talking point #3: Sign 180

republicanveteran · Commander Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 333 Location: Texas

You are right, Wallace is inept on this issue...

O'rielly is not letting the liberal guest get off without being pummeled.