Author |
Message |
Topic: So how long till this happens here? |
Paul
Replies: 33
Views: 22315
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 7:40 pm Subject: I disagree - some clarifications |
Paul you are oversimplifying the issue by saying it is a "Nationalist Movement" and "Not our problem".
Hi Rb:
I disagree. Our fight is already complex enough due to the many components and int ... |
Topic: war for oil |
Paul
Replies: 21
Views: 14483
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:22 pm Subject: Force Levels and Iraq 'biting off too much to chew?' |
"Force levels could be higher but we've the smallest military since 1940 and that's a domestic political issue that can't be changed with the likes of Kerry and the Great Society entitlement culture. ... |
Topic: war for oil |
Paul
Replies: 21
Views: 14483
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:26 pm Subject: Iran |
"The Mullahs of Iran can still muster suicide squads bur there's enough Irani's who can remember a better time and the signs of unrest grow. Containment seems more efficacious than attack.
North Kor ... |
Topic: war for oil |
Paul
Replies: 21
Views: 14483
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 4:45 pm Subject: No, not quite |
"Paul has gone on into a broad ranging argument of geo-politics. We're wasting time on the weakest of the 3 members of the Axis of Evil and China is the ultimate boogey man. I agree with the premise b ... |
Topic: So how long till this happens here? |
Paul
Replies: 33
Views: 22315
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:43 pm Subject: Justly So |
"No. The charge would be a simple "Assault and Battery."" {Scott}
Hi Scott:
I agree. That's all that the charge rightly should be.
And I'd be rightly punished if guilty of it. |
Topic: So how long till this happens here? |
Paul
Replies: 33
Views: 22315
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:40 pm Subject: Chechens |
"The Chechen situattion is not just "Nationalist" Terror, they have recieved funding, training and personnel from Osama. There are numerous cases of known Al Queda links to Chechyna,. . ."
Yes. The ... |
Topic: So how long till this happens here? |
Paul
Replies: 33
Views: 22315
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:30 pm Subject: No good news on this one |
"Ouch Paul, do you have any good news?" {DevilDon}
Hi Don:
To be honest, on this topic, no. None whatsoever.
I could sarcastically point out that Mexico has trade agreements with the People's ... |
Topic: U.S. didn't lose Vietnam War |
Paul
Replies: 106
Views: 57084
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:05 pm Subject: Epistemology |
Hi SL:
I am familiar with the meaning of Epistemology, hence my question to you asking how you were using it in the context of what you wrote.
Personally, where modern philisophical systems are ... |
Topic: U.S. didn't lose Vietnam War |
Paul
Replies: 106
Views: 57084
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:04 pm Subject: More 9-11s . . . |
Hi SL:
I need to ask:
Who do you define our current enemies as being or how do you define them? How do you define "losing" for the United States against our current enemies and "victory" over us ... |
Topic: U.S. didn't lose Vietnam War |
Paul
Replies: 106
Views: 57084
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:01 pm Subject: Fiscal, Trade, Immigration - No rebound |
Hi SL:
Thanks for the thoughtful and interesting reply.
I'm also too busy to be spending as much time as I have been in the forum.
As to the "leveling." I don't believe it be temporary as y ... |
Topic: U.S. didn't lose Vietnam War |
Paul
Replies: 106
Views: 57084
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 12:56 pm Subject: Re: Bottom line Vietnam & Iraq |
"Bottom line, IMHO: Based on the circumstances and all that was known, a decisive leader had to deal with Iraq. " {USAF66-70}
Hi Fred:
With all due respect:
The US spent one year dinking arou ... |
Topic: U.S. didn't lose Vietnam War |
Paul
Replies: 106
Views: 57084
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 12:15 pm Subject: Re: Bottom line Vietnam & Iraq |
"Consider this: Say next week we do indeed finally find those elusive WMDs. Perhaps it’s unlikely, but I don’t think it’s entirely impossible, even at this late date, so humor me: Wouldn’t that make y ... |
Topic: U.S. didn't lose Vietnam War |
Paul
Replies: 106
Views: 57084
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 12:06 pm Subject: Re: Bottom line Vietnam & Iraq |
"However Paul, regarding current events, you say: “Bottom line, ask me today what I think knowing what we know now, then the US attacked the wrong target for a lot of very bad reasons given since.” {U ... |
Topic: U.S. didn't lose Vietnam War |
Paul
Replies: 106
Views: 57084
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 11:53 am Subject: Re: Bottom line Vietnam & Iraq |
"Confirms my own bottom line view of the Vietnam War issue regarding winning/losing: As LBJ indicated (on his tapes), “It wasn’t winnable.” And even if in theory it may have been winnable, “groupthink ... |
Topic: U.S. didn't lose Vietnam War |
Paul
Replies: 106
Views: 57084
|
Forum: Vets and Active Duty Military Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 11:22 am Subject: Re: aw movement in 1600 "US" |
"Could it be there has been an anti-war movement in the U.S. since the 1600’s that varies from 45% to 55% of the voting public? {Lima Charlie}
Hi LC:
The answer is no. Because the US didn't exi ... |
|