|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rdtf CNO
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 2:36 am Post subject: Bush Gets Endorsement From Iran |
|
|
interesting..
www.newsmax.xom
Bush Gets Endorsement From Iran
NewsMax Wires
Wednesday, Oct. 20, 2004
TEHRAN, Iran - The head of Iran's security council said on Tuesday the re-election of President Bush was in Tehran's best interests, despite the administration's axis of evil label, accusations that Iran harbors al-Qaida terrorists and threats of sanctions over the country's nuclear ambitions.
Historically, Democrats have harmed Iran more than Republicans, said Hasan Rowhani, head of the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security decision-making body.
"We haven't seen anything good from Democrats," Rowhani told state-run television in remarks that, for the first time in recent decades, saw Iran openly supporting one U.S. presidential candidate over another.
"We should not forget that most sanctions and economic pressures were imposed on Iran during the time of Clinton," Rowhani said of the former Democratic president. "And we should not forget that during Bush's era - despite his hard-line and baseless rhetoric against Iran - he didn't take, in practical terms, any dangerous action against Iran."
Though Iran generally does not publicly wade into U.S. presidential politics, it has a history of preferring Republicans over Democrats, who tend to press human rights issues.
"We do not desire to see Democrats take over," Rowhani said when asked if Iran was supporting Kerry against Bush.
The United States severed diplomatic relations with Iran after militants stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979 and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. Iranian clerics were crucial in determining the fate of the 1980 U.S. election when Republican Ronald Reagan won in part because Democratic incumbent Jimmy Carter was unable to secure the hostages' release.
The hostages were freed as Reagan was inaugurated.
The United States supported Iraq in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war, but by the late 1990s, U.S.-Iranian relations were somewhat better. They plummeted again after Bush accused Iran of being part of the "axis of evil" with North Korea and prewar Iraq.
Bush Destroyed Enemies
The Bush administration also accuses Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons and sheltering operatives of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terror network. Still, Iran was happy to see Bush destroy two big regional enemies - the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
Iranian political analyst Mohsen Mofidi said ousting the Taliban and Saddam was the "biggest service any administration could have done for Iran."
And Bush, he said, has learned from his mistakes.
"The experience of two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the responsibility Bush had, will make it a very remote possibility for him to risk attacking a much bigger and more powerful country like Iran," he said.
Mofidi added that "Democrats usually insist on human rights and they will have more excuses to pressure Iran."
Republican and Democratic presidents have issued executive orders against Iran, with Reagan in 1987 barring Iranian crude oil and other imports, and Clinton in 1995 banning U.S. trade and investment in Iran.
Bush has been reluctant to offer Iran any incentives for better U.S.-Iranian relations, but in recent days there have been signs Washington will back European economic incentives if Iran stops uranium enrichment activities.
Gholamreza Aghazadeh, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, was quoted by state-run television Tuesday as saying Iran is interested in buying nuclear fuel from the West, but will not concede its right to the technology.
The nuclear issue has been most sensitive, and the Bush administration is threatening to press for sanctions against Iran over it. Washington accuses Tehran of trying to build bombs. Tehran says its nuclear ambitions are peaceful, for energy purposes.
Kerry, who says halting nuclear proliferation will be a priority if he becomes president, believes Bush should have done more diplomatically to curb Iran's alleged nuclear weapons ambitions. He says Iran should be offered nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes, but spent fuel should be taken back so it cannot be used to develop nuclear weapons.
Kavoos Emami, another Iranian political analyst, praised Kerry for mentioning the need for dialogue with Iran, and said the Democrat would be better for Iran.
"Bush has insulted Iran more than any other U.S. administration. If Kerry is elected, a U.S. military attack against Iran will never happen or will be a very remote possibility," he said.
© 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anker-Klanker Admiral
Joined: 04 Sep 2004 Posts: 1033 Location: Richardson, TX
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Weird! There has to be some kind of perverse logic in this, but darned if I can see it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chuck54 PO1
Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 466
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1251523/posts
Check this link out...AP caught lying again on Iran Endorsement of Bush _________________ "And no pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often, than the two Senators from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry"
Zell Miller |
|
Back to top |
|
|
azpatriot Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 593 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anker-Klanker wrote: | Weird! There has to be some kind of perverse logic in this, but darned if I can see it. |
It's easy with Bush they know what they are dealing with.
With Kerry it's a crapshoot _________________ Proud to be an American! and member of the PAJAMAHADEEN
FedEx Kinko's: When it absolutely, positively has to be forged overnight |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anker-Klanker Admiral
Joined: 04 Sep 2004 Posts: 1033 Location: Richardson, TX
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thx, Chuck54. I knew it was weird. I'd never have guessed the real answer, but from now on I guess everything should be suspect. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chuck54 PO1
Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 466
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anker-Klanker wrote: | Thx, Chuck54. I knew it was weird. I'd never have guessed the real answer, but from now on I guess everything should be suspect. |
Just say this link today. Apparently Iran is saying it does not make a difference.
http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=26256&NewsKind=Current%20Affairs _________________ "And no pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often, than the two Senators from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry"
Zell Miller |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tex Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 84
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Simple reverse psychology. I think al-Qaeda tried the same thing earlier this year. One of their "spokespersons" issued a statement that Democrats were tougher on them than Republicans. I seem to recall similar MSM headlines like, "al-Qaeda prefers Bush". _________________ "If I must choose between righteousness and peace, I choose righteousness." -- Theodore Roosevelt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rdtf CNO
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ocsparky101 PO1
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 479 Location: Allen Park. Michigan
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't believe it. The truth is that 10 out of 10 terrorists support John Kerry. Those are the facts. I have see no evidence otherwise to convince me that no it is really 9 out of 10. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ocsparky101 PO1
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 479 Location: Allen Park. Michigan
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't believe it. The truth is that 10 out of 10 terrorists support John Kerry. Those are the facts. I have see no evidence otherwise to convince me that no it is really 9 out of 10. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|