SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Conclusive Proof that the NYT Is Lying - GET THE WORD OUT!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PowerPro
Ensign


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 67
Location: Northeast Tennessee

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:08 am    Post subject: Conclusive Proof that the NYT Is Lying - GET THE WORD OUT! Reply with quote

All evening I've heard stories that maybe the soldiers in the 101st didn't actually inspect the compound, etc. and the new New York Slimes story coming out tomorrow makes it look like the commander of the 101st agreed with them.

So apparently the troops accidentally tripped over the atropine while on their "pit stop".

Well, sorry New York Slimes. This is the record.

Let's get this report off to EVERYONE in the media and show Jean Francois Kerre for the opportunistic loser that he is!!!

Archives are our friends. Surprised)



Allies Find Signs of Iraq's Chemical Preparedness
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,83252,00.html

Friday, April 04, 2003 - AP

On Friday (April 4, 2003), troops at a training facility in the western Iraqi desert came across a bottle labeled "tabun" -- a nerve gas and chemical weapon Iraq is banned from possessing.

Closer to Baghdad, troops at Iraq's largest military industrial complex found nerve agent antidotes, documents describing chemical warfare and a white powder that appeared to be used for explosives.

U.N. weapons inspectors went repeatedly to the vast al Qa Qaa complex -- most recently on March 8 (2003) -- but found nothing during spot visits to some of the 1,100 buildings at the site 25 miles south of Baghdad.

- snip -

Peabody told an Associated Press reporter that troops at al Qa Qaa also discovered atropine, used to counter the effects of nerve agents, and 2-PAM chloride, which is used in combination with atropine in case of chemical attack.

- snip -


(Excerpt) Read more at http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,83252,00.html


==========================


Okay - hopefully I'm the first here to post this - if not, I apologize! I did a search and didn't see a specfic thread regarding a full rebuttal to the New York Slimes article ...

I posted this also on Free Republic on this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1258235/posts
_________________
ANNOUNCING: DOUBLE W. Which means, KERRY LOST! Now don't that feel GOOD????

Thank you SBVs & POWs FT! Your service to this country is incalculable!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ord33
Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 670
Location: Ohio

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

powerpro,

That was a good find. I dont know how to react to it though...Perhaps the comment about the UN Weapons Inspectors not finding anything was referring to WMD? I dont know. Then the article says that American Troops did find thousands of 2x5 boxes with white powder (the explosives). After reading this, I dont know if this is such a good article after all, but I could be wrong! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
drjohn
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 550
Location: CT

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They were actually there on March 9 also but they weren't looking for any of that stuff.

In fact, they last counted on 25 Dec 2002, maybe.

After that, nothing. It could easily have been taken between then and the war. They'd never know.


Last edited by drjohn on Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:24 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jerake
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 16 Sep 2004
Posts: 91
Location: IL

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This just recently got posted about an hour ago(I think it's the same article? I could be wrong)

http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/002872.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
PowerPro
Ensign


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 67
Location: Northeast Tennessee

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So RDX and HMX is so dangerous now but it wasn't dangerous then? Supposedly this stuff is not like shells or regular bombs - it's much more dangerous, right? Wouldn't the article mention other highly explosive ordnance being there?

Plus this article clearly shows it might have been a "pit stop" for the 101st but the that the site was searched by the 3rd ID (at the minimum) and that they did not view it as a high security risk as it was...
_________________
ANNOUNCING: DOUBLE W. Which means, KERRY LOST! Now don't that feel GOOD????

Thank you SBVs & POWs FT! Your service to this country is incalculable!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
azpatriot
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 593
Location: Arizona

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For those of you wondering just what this stuff is here is a link that explains the differences.

Explosives - Nitramines
_________________
Proud to be an American! and member of the PAJAMAHADEEN Cool
FedEx Kinko's: When it absolutely, positively has to be forged overnight Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PowerPro
Ensign


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 67
Location: Northeast Tennessee

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
This just recently got posted about an hour ago(I think it's the same article? I could be wrong)


It is a different article - but it comes to the same conclusion and supports our argument. Per the Captains Quarters:

Troops of the 3ID discovered thousands of boxes, each with three vials of white powder, the form in which the explosive agents that the IAEA claim went missing were stored. From this description, it sounds as if the material left at Al Qaqaa would have only been samples or starter materials, as storing 380 tons of powdered explosive in vials would have taken most of Baghdad to store.

Nevertheless, the contemporaneous CBS report showed that the 3ID knew what they had at Al Qaqaa and did more than just a cursory look around the joint to go sightseeing. They suspected that the facility held WMD or chemical-weapons manufacturing capability. A bottle labeled "tabun," a nerve agent, was found with a small amount of the chemical inside. The troops also discovered atropine stored at the bunker, an antidote for nerve agents, making them very suspicious of the shells stored at Al Qaqaa.
_________________
ANNOUNCING: DOUBLE W. Which means, KERRY LOST! Now don't that feel GOOD????

Thank you SBVs & POWs FT! Your service to this country is incalculable!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PowerPro
Ensign


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 67
Location: Northeast Tennessee

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you AZPATRIOT - I was wondering...
_________________
ANNOUNCING: DOUBLE W. Which means, KERRY LOST! Now don't that feel GOOD????

Thank you SBVs & POWs FT! Your service to this country is incalculable!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
drjohn
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 550
Location: CT

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gee- before the war they weren't dangerous because they were

"DUAL-USE"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LewWaters
Admin


Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 5:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone else considering the logistics involved in "looting" 380 tons?

For sake of argument, say a semi truck carries 10 tons each. We're talking 38 semis or more rolling up to a fence, getting in and quietly driving off with the stuff, unnoticed. Shocked
_________________
Clark County Conservative
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PowerPro
Ensign


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 67
Location: Northeast Tennessee

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And the New York Slimes story continues to unravel:

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/26/223708.shtml

Feb. 2003 UN Report: Saddam Moving Explosives From Al-Qaqaa

The United Nations nuclear watchdog group first reported that Saddam Hussein had begun moving stockpiles of explosives from his Al-Qaqaa nuclear weapons facility a month before the U.S. invaded Iraq.

The February 2003 report by the International Atomic Energy Agency, first reported Tuesday by the Fox News Channel, severely undermines claims by the New York Times, CBS News and the Kerry campaign that the Al-Qaqaa explosives went missing only after the U.S. gained control of the facility.

Fox correspondent Bret Baier detailed the chronology of events at Al-Qaqaa for "Special Report with Brit Hume":
* "In January 2003, inspectors with the International Atomic Energy Agency went to the Al-Qaqaa storage facility, tagging and sealing the large stockpile of powerful conventional explosives, HMX and RDX.

* "In February 2003, IEAE chief Mohamed ElBaradei reported to the United Nations Security Council that some explosives had been removed from Al Qua Quaa - 377 tons remained.

* "On March 8, 2003, IEAE inspectors made their last check of the facility before the war. The IAEA said that included a spot check on some - but not all - of the sealed explosives.

* "The war started March 19. After the Army's third division moved through here on their way to Baghdad, the first US troops stopped in to Al-Qaqaa on April 9.

* "A Reuters camera crew embedded with the Scouts from the 101st Airborne Division arrived at the storage facility, did a quick search noting a number of bunkers filled with explosives - but nothing marked by the IAEA.

* "On April 10, the Second Brigade of the 101st arrived there and spent the night.. An NBC crew was with them. A cursory search was conducted. Again, nothing marked or tagged by the IAEA was spotted. The Second Brigade left the next day, pushing forward to Baghdad.

* "US weapons inspectors, the Iraq Survey Group, arrived at the site on May 27, conducting a full search of the 32 bunkers - and they did not find any of the IAEA-marked explosives."

Baier's report continued:

"If one large truck contains ten tons, US commanders say it's highly unlikely that insurgents managed to take 38 truckloads worth of explosives out of the facility in that time.

"The roads were filled with convoys pushing to Baghdad, clogged with supplies and communications lines stretching all the way back to Kuwait - all being watched closely by unmanned aerial vehicles like the Jointstars and the Predators to protect the troops rear flank and to spot unusual activity.

"Defense Secretary Rumsfeld - asked about the missing explosives in a radio interview today - said the specifics are under investigation by the Iraq Survey Group. But he chose to point out that Saddam Hussein moved many weapons and explosives before the war."
_________________
ANNOUNCING: DOUBLE W. Which means, KERRY LOST! Now don't that feel GOOD????

Thank you SBVs & POWs FT! Your service to this country is incalculable!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
stylin19
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 122

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 6:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Drjohn was way ahead of us. He had the Fox article on 10/25....

http://www2.swiftvets.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=14541
_________________
U.S.M.C. - 1969-1971
RVN- 1970-1971
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 6:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moving to Geedunk Forum

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group