View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
GM Strong Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 18 Sep 2004 Posts: 1579 Location: Penna
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 1:33 am Post subject: Clarence Thomas-Chief Justice |
|
|
Superb Choice. Lets get it done. _________________ 8th Army Korea 68-69 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hope the Bush Administration does make this nomination.
Thomas would be an excellent choice for Chief Justice.
He is a very deliberate thinker with a fine intellect.
I doubt that the Judiciary Comittee would want to revisit
the debacle of Thomas's first confirmation hearing when they
attempted a "high-tech lynching" (Thomas's words)
which backfired on the Democrat senators.
This good man has my full support!
From Drudge Report:
BUSH CONSIDERS CLARENCE THOMAS FOR CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exclusive**
President Bush has launched an internal review of the pros and cons of nominating Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as the chief justice if ailing William Rehnquist retires, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
A top White House source familiar with Bush's thinking explains the review of Thomas as chief justice is one of several options currently under serious consideration. But Thomas is Bush's personal favorite to take the position, the source claims.
"It would not only be historic, to nominate a minority as chief justice, symbolizing the president's strong belief in hope and optimism, but it would be a sound judicial move.... Justice Thomas simply has an extraordinary record."
One concern is the amount of political capital Bush would have to spend in congress to make the move.
A chief justice must be separately nominated by Bush and confirmed by the Senate, even if the person is already sitting on the court.
The need to replace Rehnquist could arise by year's end, Bush aides now believe.
Officially, Bush advisers call any Supreme Court vacancy talk premature.
Developing...
--------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wwIIvetsdaughter Captain
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 513 Location: McAllen, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lets see what the NAALCP (National Association for the Advancement of LIBERAL Colored People) would have to say about CT's nomination (if it occurs). Would they stoop so low again as to call him an Uncle Tom? If so, what would fair minded minority Americans think of it? The shine is off that penny! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
srmorton PO2
Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 383 Location: Jacksonville, NC
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
As I have mentioned in a previous thread, Arlen Specter was very
supportive of Clarence Thomas during his confirmation hearings.
Should he get the chairmanship of the Judiciary Commitee, he would
be hard pressed to object to Thomas as Chief Justice. I, too, think
Thomas would be an excellent choice due to his deep intellect and
his age. I believe he is the youngest member of the court. _________________ Susan R. Morton |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Roon PO2
Joined: 12 Sep 2004 Posts: 393 Location: Lilburn, GA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've always admired Clarance Thomas and am still amazed at the jokes which still exist about him so many years later. However, I'm certain it is meant to keep the deception alive. The worst thing that could happen to the cause of Jesse Jackson and others like him is for Clarance Thomas to become validated and to be admired and honored by the minorities of this country. When the minorities begin to really believe in the power of the individual and less in the power of the masses, the tide begins to change and the demise of Jesse Jackson and others like him begins.
I believe he would be a wonderful Chief Justice. George Bush needs to make the same statement with Clarance Thomas that he has made with Colin Powell and Condi Rice. Treat them as the equal he and many others see them as. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TEWSPilot Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1235 Location: Kansas (Transplanted Texan)
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
In 1846, Dred Scott and his wife Harriet filed suit for their freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court. This suit began an eleven-year legal fight that ended in the U.S. Supreme Court, which issued a landmark decision declaring that Scott remain a slave. This decision contributed to rising tensions between the free and slave states just before the American Civil War.
In 2005, a black man may well become Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.
What does this say to all the critics about the greatest nation on Earth? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Balloon Artist PO3
Joined: 25 Aug 2004 Posts: 262 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do it!!!! _________________ What about John Kerry's four months in Vietnam qualify him to be president?
Al Gore was there for five. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TEWSPilot Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1235 Location: Kansas (Transplanted Texan)
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
...and both Kerry and Gore were there for photo ops.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peter Lieutenant
Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Outstanding choice -- The BEST viable option.
My question is this -- When a sitting Associate Justice is picked to be the Chief Justice -- he has to go through the approval process. I'm wondering is his jeopardy as an associate justice at 'risk' if lets say, he is NOT approved. In other words, does he momentarily put his 'tenure' at risk.
He is by far my favorite justice. Would the left wing nut job Anita Hill be called back up to the hill during confirmation hearings? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GM Strong Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 18 Sep 2004 Posts: 1579 Location: Penna
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peter wrote: | Outstanding choice -- The BEST viable option.
My question is this -- When a sitting Associate Justice is picked to be the Chief Justice -- he has to go through the approval process. I'm wondering is his jeopardy as an associate justice at 'risk' if lets say, he is NOT approved. In other words, does he momentarily put his 'tenure' at risk.
He is by far my favorite justice. Would the left wing nut job Anita Hill be called back up to the hill during confirmation hearings? |
His position as Associate Justice is fixed. Rhenquist had the same thing done. They could possiblly have new hearings, but the old crap would not(should not be rehashed if the Dems know what is good for them) be relevant. He would normally just stand for and up or down vote, but Chucky Shumer and Ted (hic) Kennedy could make trouble at their own risk. _________________ 8th Army Korea 68-69 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carpro Admin
Joined: 10 May 2004 Posts: 1176 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't want to start a fight but I like Scalia better. _________________ "If he believes his 1971 indictment of his country and his fellow veterans was true, then he couldn't possibly be proud of his Vietnam service." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GM Strong Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 18 Sep 2004 Posts: 1579 Location: Penna
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
carpro wrote: | Don't want to start a fight but I like Scalia better. |
He's the other logical choice. _________________ 8th Army Korea 68-69 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TEWSPilot Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 1235 Location: Kansas (Transplanted Texan)
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm just glad that those names are in play instead of "Hillary Clinton" or "Ruth Bader Ginzburg" or any of the ACLU bottom feeders.
My undying gratitude to the Swift Boat Veterans and POWs for Truth and every one of my brothers and sisters on this site who helped carry the ball over the goal line. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
misako Ensign
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Either Clarence Thomas or Scalia is fine with me, but I think Scalia deserves it as much as CT. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I love Antonin Scalia!! An excellent man. But I think he would draw
a real firestorm from the left. Some of his public statements, etc.
Remember how they tried to make a scandal of his association with
Dick Cheney, it was just a group of guys on a fishing trip.
I don't think they would be so ready to attack Thomas, since he has
kinda flown under the radar for most of his years on the Court.
Also, his age is a factor. I believe he is only 59, which means that
we would have a good conservative Chief Justice for many years
to come. I'm not sure, but I think Scalia is 70.
I think President Bush is looking to the future, and wants to ensure
that the court will have strict constructionist, conservative direction
going forward. Long after his presidency is over. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|