SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Lipscomb: Kerry Discharge questioned by JAG Officer
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Resources & Research
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DenisC
Seaman


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 166
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL

PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No matter what, it is too late and will not be desiminated by the MSM.
_________________
DenisC
173rd Airborne, RVN '65-67'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Truegrit
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 246
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:00 am    Post subject: Yes, too late Reply with quote

It won't affect the outcome at this point. News takes a couple of days to disseminate, get discussed and sink in.

The MSM have failed in their duty to defend American democracy, by failing to investigate the character of John Kerry and his meetings with the enemy in Paris.
_________________
Ted Harwood, Ph.D.
Enlisted, U.S. Army ('57-'60)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
hleone
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Please excuse if this has already been asked.

I heard somewhere recently that even if Kerry did get a less-than-honorable discharge, he could not be criticized for not admitting it, because the upgraded honorable discharge would have legally displaced the previous discharge, and as far as the military is concerned, the originally issued discharge would no longer exist.

Is this an accurate assessment?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jwb7605
Rear Admiral


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 690
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes and no, IMHO.
The point would be that he got the first less-than-honorable for collaboration with the enemy.
That would be the "convicted" part of Article 14 Section 3 of the constitution.
Which would be the grounds for removing him from the Senate.

Otherwise:
(a) a less-than-honorable, in and of itself, might NOT be grounds ... just being slimy does NOT disqualify one from the Senate or Presidency.
(b) "consorting with Communists", especially these days, is just a spin-control exercise.

If you have (a) because of (b), then you have something.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Resources & Research All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group