 |
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
vet_supporter Lt.Jg.
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find it interesting that Mr. Schaivo has started the talk show circuit this week in a media PR blitz to garner sympathy for starving his wife to death.
If the media presented the actual facts about death by starvation, the public outcry would be so loud there would be a successful movement to remove Judge Greer from office. I've written everyone in the State that I can demanding that this incompetent judge be removed. Starving a handicapped person to death by court order? This is someone who should sit in judgment of anyone?
Just to give an example of how clueless the public is about this case, a friend of mine ask why I had sent them a request to sign a Terri petition. When I told them the woman was not in a coma or on life support, that was news to them. They had been led to believe Terri was in a coma and would simply have the life support machine turned off. How outrageous is this?
The media could make a difference in this case. Instead, we hear how distraught Michael Jackson is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TRANSCRIPT: Michael Shiavo on 'Nightline'
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=584124&page=1
What a sack of S**T!!! I think I'm going to barf.
Quote: | SCHIAVO: That's one of their soapboxes they've been on for a long time.
Terry will not be starved to death. Her nutrition and hydration will be taken away. This happens across this country every day.
Death through removing somebody's nutrition is very painless. That has been brought to the courts many of times. Doctors have come in and testified. It is a very painless procedure.Terry can't — she has no cortex left. She doesn't feel pain. She doesn't feel hunger. So what's going to happen is slowly — her potassium and her electrolytes will slowly diminish and she will drift off to a nice little sleep and eventually pass on to be with God. |
JUST 'A NICE LITTLE SLEEP'
SO SAY YOUR CHOSEN DOCTORS, MICHAEL??? _________________ “I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LewWaters Admin
Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 4042 Location: Washington State
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Odd that the attorney, Felos, neglected to mention, that included in the "fees" mentioned in what happened to the malpractice money, he has received some $600,000 of it.
Michael Schiavo seems hellbent on replacing Scott Peterson as the most hated man in the country.
Quote: | JUST 'A NICE LITTLE SLEEP' |
If they have never gone through it, how can they state this so authoritatively??????  _________________ Clark County Conservative |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AMOS Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 558 Location: IOWA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:28 pm Post subject: George Felos |
|
|
Michael St. Schiavo's attorney, George Felos said "It's a constitutional right to say, "I don't want medical treatment" and the state can't force you to have it."...............I didn't know that. Thomas Jefferson and the other framers of the Constitution were really looking ahead. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to show you who Michael Shiavo's selected 'expert doctor' is, and upon whose medical diagnosis Judge Greer has based all of his 'rulings'.
Starving for a Fair Diagnosis
Terri Schiavo is not out of medical options. But that’s the “fact” her husband wants you to believe.
Quote: | ~snip~.......In the course of my conversation with Dr. Morin, he made reference to the standard use of MRI and PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scans to diagnose the extent of brain injuries. He seemed to assume that these had been done for Terri. I stopped him and told him that these tests have never been done for her; that Michael had refused them.
There was a moment of dead silence.
“That’s criminal,” he said, and then asked, in a tone of utter incredulity: “How can he continue as guardian? People are deliberating over this woman’s life and death and there’s been no MRI or PET?” He drew a reasonable conclusion: “These people [Michael Schiavo, George Felos, and Judge Greer] don’t want the information.”
Dr. Morin explained that he would feel obligated to obtain the information in these tests before making a diagnosis with life and death consequences. I told him that CT (Computer-Aided Tomography) scans had been done, and were partly the basis for the finding of PVS. The doctor retorted, “Spare no expense, eh?” I asked him to explain the comment; he said that a CT scan is a much less expensive test than an MRI, but it “only gives you a tenth of the information an MRI does.” He added, “A CT scan is useful only in pretty severe cases, such as trauma, and also during the few days after an anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain injury. It’s useful in an emergency-room setting. But if the question is ischemic injury [brain damage caused by lack of blood/oxygen to part of the brain] you want an MRI and PET. For subsequent evaluation of brain injury, the CT is pretty useless unless there has been a massive stroke.”
Other neurologists have concurred with Dr. Morin’s opinion. Dr. Thomas Zabiega, who trained at the University of Chicago, said, “Any neurologist who is objective would say ‘Yes’” to the question, “Should Terri be given an MRI?”
But in spite of the lack of advanced testing, such as an MRI, attorney George Felos has claimed that Terri’s cerebral cortex has “liquefied,” and doctors for Michael Schiavo have claimed, on the basis of the CT scans, that parts of Terri’s cerebral cortex “have been replaced by fluid.” The problem with such contentions is that the available evidence can’t support them. Dr. Zabiega explained that “a CT scan can’t resolve the kind of detail needed” to make such a pronouncement: “A CT scan is like a blurry photograph.” Dr. William Bell, a professor of neurology at Wake Forest University Medical School, agrees: “A CT scan doesn’t give much detail. In order to see it on a CT, you have to have massive damage.” Is it possible that Terri has that sort of “massive” brain damage? According to Dr. Bell, that isn’t likely. Sometimes, he said, even patients who are PVS have a “normal or near normal” MRI.
So why hasn’t an MRI been done for Terri? That question has never been satisfactorily answered. George Felos has argued that an MRI can’t be done because of thalamic implants that were placed in Terri’s skull during the last attempt at therapy, dating back to 1992. But Felos’s contention ignores the fact that these implants could be removed. Indeed, the doctor who put them in instructed Michael to have them removed. Michael has never done so.
The most obvious possible explanation for what would otherwise be inexplicable behavior is that Michael Schiavo, George Felos, and Judge Greer don’t want to admit any information that would upset the diagnosis they already have. Dr. Morin, when told that Michael had refused an MRI, and that Judge Greer had confirmed the decision, said: “He refused a non-invasive test? People trying to do the right thing want the best and most complete information available. We don't have that in Terri’s case.” Dr. Bell agreed with this assessment, saying, “It seems as though they’re fearful of any additional information.”
THE CRANFORD DIAGNOSIS
Doctors for Michael Schiavo have said that an MRI and PET are not necessary for Terri because PVS is primarily a “clinical” diagnosis, that is, one arrived at on the basis of examination of the patient, rather than by relying on tests. And the neurologists I have spoken to agree on the clinical nature of the diagnosis, while insisting that advanced tests nonetheless are a necessary part of it. But the star medical witness for Michael Schiavo, Dr. Ronald Cranford of the University of Minnesota, has repeatedly dismissed calls for MRI testing, and his opinion has prevailed.
Dr. Cranford was the principal medical witness brought in by Schiavo and Felos to support their position that Terri was PVS. Judge Greer was obviously impressed by Cranford’s résumé: Cranford travels throughout the country testifying in cases involving PVS and brain impairment. He is widely recognized by courts as an expert in these issues, and in some circles is considered “the” expert on PVS. His clinical judgment has carried the day in many cases, so it is relevant to examine the manner in which he arrived at his judgment in Terri’s case. But before that, one needs to know a little about Cranford’s background and perspective: Dr. Ronald Cranford is one of the most outspoken advocates of the “right to die” movement and of physician-assisted suicide in the U.S. today.
In published articles, including a 1997 op-ed in the Minneapolis–St. Paul Star Tribune, he has advocated the starvation of Alzheimer’s patients. He has described PVS patients as indistinguishable from other forms of animal life. He has said that PVS patients and others with brain impairment lack personhood and should have no constitutional rights. Perusing the case literature and articles surrounding the “right to die” and PVS, one will see Dr. Cranford’s name surface again and again. In almost every case, he is the one claiming PVS, and advocating the cessation of nutrition and hydration.
In the cases of Paul Brophy, Nancy Jobes, Nancy Cruzan, and Christine Busalucci, Cranford was the doctor behind the efforts to end their lives. Each of these people was brain-damaged but not dying; nonetheless, he advocated death for all, by dehydration and starvation. Nancy Cruzan did not even require a feeding tube: She could be spoon-fed. But Cranford advocated denying even that, saying that even spoon-feeding constituted “medical treatment” that could be licitly withdrawn.
In cases where other doctors don’t see it, Dr. Cranford seems to have a knack for finding PVS. Cranford also diagnosed Robert Wendland as PVS. He did so in spite of the fact that Wendland could pick up specifically colored pegs or blocks and hand them to a therapy assistant on request. He did so in spite of the fact that Wendland could operate and maneuver an ordinary wheelchair with his left hand and foot, and an electric wheelchair with a joystick, of the kind that many disabled persons (most famously Dr. Stephen Hawking) use. Dr. Cranford dismissed these abilities as meaningless. Fortunately for Wendland, the California supreme court was not persuaded by Cranford’s assessment.
Expert witnesses in court are supposed to be unbiased: disinterested in the outcome of the case. Part of the procedure in qualifying expert witnesses is establishing that they are objective and unbiased. But given Dr. Cranford’s history of advocacy in the “right to die” and euthanasia movements, and given his track record of almost always coming down on the side of PVS and removal of nutrition and hydration, one might question his objectivity. Indeed, the Schindlers’ attorneys attempted to do so in the 2002 evidentiary hearing at which Cranford testified, but went unheard. Organizations such as the International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide submitted amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs in the appellate proceedings in Terri’s case, demonstrating Cranford’s bias in detail. But these arguments also seemed to fall on deaf ears.
Some neurologists who also consult in legal cases were not surprised at the handling of Dr. Cranford’s expert testimony. In theory, they said, the expert witness is supposed to be objective, but, as Dr. Bell explained, “the way it really works is that an attorney carefully selects an expert that will give him the outcome he desires.” He related that he has been asked by attorneys to serve as an expert. “I have looked over medical records,” he said, “and told attorneys what I thought.” But on occasion, he said, his opinion was “obviously not what they wanted to hear” and “they moved on to another expert.” Bell acknowledged that Cranford is “a highly accomplished and experienced speaker,” but said that in him the court “likely found a highly prejudiced expert.”~snip~....... |
Continued at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/johansen200503160848.asp
A long, but VERY informative article!!
Recommend reading its entirety. _________________ “I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newly elected Senator Mel Martinez of Florida explains the Bill now
before congress:
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/martinez200503161444.asp
Quote: | Legal Refuge
Congress aims to protect Terri Schiavo.
By Senator Mel Martinez
March 16, 2005 2:44 p.m.
This Friday, after a long and protracted legal struggle, a Florida woman named Terri Schiavo will be starved to death by court order.
In 1990, at the age of 27, Terri Schiavo collapsed, resulting in brain damage from a lack of oxygen. A feeding tube was inserted by doctors at that time to provide nutrition and hydration to keep her alive.
Over the last 15 years, there has been a protracted legal fight between Terri’s parents, who insist that Teri wants to live and want guardianship of their daughter, and Terri’s husband, who insists Terri wants to die and currently has guardianship. It has without a doubt been an emotional and drawn-out legal battle over what Terri’s wishes truly were and whether or not her feeding tube should be removed.
Terri is severely brain-damaged — of that there is no question. However, many media reports have indicated that she is in a persistent vegetative state. There is evidence to the contrary.
She is not on a respirator or other 24-hour-a-day medical equipment. She responds to voices, touch, and the presence of people. She can smile, cry, and establish eye contact. She can make facial expressions. And several of Terri’s caregivers and outside medical professionals feel that, with proper therapy, she may even be able to learn to eat without a feeding tube.
For years, this legal battle between Terri’s parents and her husband has made its way through Florida’s courts, Florida’s legislature and Florida’s governor’s office. All legal options available in the state of Florida have been exhausted and the Schiavo case has culminated with a final court-ordered removal of the feeding tube and cessation of nutrition and hydration on March 18 — this Friday.
Last week, I introduced my first piece of legislation in the Senate: The Incapacitated Person’s Legal Protection Act of 2005. This bill would ensure that incapacitated individuals — like Terri Schiavo — would have their due-process rights of habeas corpus when a court orders their death by removal of nutrition, hydration and medical treatment. My colleague from Florida, Congressman Dave Weldon has introduced identical legislation in the House of Representatives.
“Habeas Corpus” refers to the legal rights available under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution that “No State…shall deprive any person of life…without due process of law…nor to deny any person within its jurisdiction equal protections of the laws.”
In essence, this legislation would give incapacitated individuals like Terri, who have been given what amounts to a death sentence by the courts, federal habeas corpus protections to ensure that she receives the same due process protections as convicted murderers given the death penalty.
This bill is very narrowly written and a balanced approach to acknowledging the rights of individuals to refuse consent to medical treatment with the right to consent to treatment to preserve life. The Incapacitated Person’s Legal Protection Act would only apply when the following criteria are met:
There is a contested judicial proceeding because of a dispute about the expressed previous wishes or best interest of a person currently incapable of making a choice about lifesaving treatment;
There is no valid prior written directive on wishes from the now-incapacitated individual; and
There is a court order authorizing or directing the withholding of food, fluids, or medical treatment to sustain the individual’s life.
This is not a right-to-life or right-to-die issue — it is about proper legal representation for individuals with no voice for themselves. It’s about giving a last avenue of legal refuge to disabled individuals when their lives hang in the balance.
This is a narrowly tailored, compassionate piece of legislation to ensure that Terri Schiavo has all legal due process available to her before following through on a court order that, in all seriousness, is a death sentence.
Before you click onto another screen or go back to work, please contact your senators and contact your congressman to let them know that you support this bill — that Terri Schiavo deserves the same rights as criminals to equal protection under the law.
— Mel Martinez is a freshman Republican senator from Florida. |
_________________ “I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vet_supporter Lt.Jg.
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am outraged that the appeals court keeps ruling against Terri.
The Govenor of a State can commute a death sentence for a condemned murderer but the courts of Florida says he can't save a court condemned handicapped person? A person whose supposed guardian has worked against her best interest for the last 13 years?
Govenor Bush and the Legislature saved Terri once before and the Florida courts overturned the law. How outrageous is this?
How outrageous that the perponderance of experts disagree with the "expert" who goes around the country promoting killing handicapped people.
You know, allowing Terri to be killed in this inhumane way is just the tip of the iceberg. The euthanasia crowd are pouring money into this. They view this as the precedent. Who will be starved to death next because of this?
Don't you find it interesting that the "judge" and I use this term loosely, is so unsure of the validity of the diagnosis, that he has refused all the modern tests, developed since Terri's "accident" that are now available for diagnosis? This right there should show that the "judge" has something to hide as well.
What disgusts me is the stupid appeals court rubber-stamping the rulings of this incompetent "judge".
So, when the precedent is set, we can legally take granny out after her stroke and let her starve to death out in the yard. All we have to do is get Mr. Schavio's attorney to represent us. The State would dare not challenge us.
This lunacy has got to be stopped. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rdtf CNO
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vet_supporter wrote: | I am outraged that the appeals court keeps ruling against Terri.
The Govenor of a State can commute a death sentence for a condemned murderer but the courts of Florida says he can't save a court condemned handicapped person? A person whose supposed guardian has worked against her best interest for the last 13 years?
Govenor Bush and the Legislature saved Terri once before and the Florida courts overturned the law. How outrageous is this?
How outrageous that the perponderance of experts disagree with the "expert" who goes around the country promoting killing handicapped people.
You know, allowing Terri to be killed in this inhumane way is just the tip of the iceberg. The euthanasia crowd are pouring money into this. They view this as the precedent. Who will be starved to death next because of this?
Don't you find it interesting that the "judge" and I use this term loosely, is so unsure of the validity of the diagnosis, that he has refused all the modern tests, developed since Terri's "accident" that are now available for diagnosis? This right there should show that the "judge" has something to hide as well.
What disgusts me is the stupid appeals court rubber-stamping the rulings of this incompetent "judge".
So, when the precedent is set, we can legally take granny out after her stroke and let her starve to death out in the yard. All we have to do is get Mr. Schavio's attorney to represent us. The State would dare not challenge us.
This lunacy has got to be stopped. |
Very well said! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Navy_Navy_Navy Admin
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 5777
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With the 2nd Circus declining to hear a petition for a stay yesterday, the Florida legislature better get this done today.
And God, can't something be done to allow at least visitation by her family? (Her real family, I mean - not that POS that is legally married to her.)
The whole thing is just sick, sick, sick. What her parents must be going through is just beyond my imagination.
I've written to my Congresswoman and both Senators and hope that they will look into this case and see that there is so much more to it than what the husband wants you to believe that there is.
There are at least QUESTIONS in this case and differing medical views - and where there is a question as to whether or not someone has any quality of life, the benefit of the doubt simply must be given to the person who is incapacitated.
It seems clear from the video clips that I've seen that this woman is definitely interacting with and reacting to her environment. Is that alone not enough to convince these pinhead judges that there is someone in there????
Good Lord, you don't need a medical degree to see that this woman is capable of emotion and expression. Very sad. How can we be letting this happen in the United States?
EJ _________________ ~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Where are all those bleeding-heart liberals who scream at any percieved
mistreatment of terrorist murderers???
http://www.nationalreview.com/mccarthy/mccarthy200503170758.asp
Quote: | March 17, 2005, 7:58 a.m.
Torturing Terri Schiavo
Andrew C. McCarthyl
She’d be better off if she were a terrorist.
A few months back, I wrote an article for Commentary arguing that we ought to reconsider our anti-torture laws. The argument wasn’t novel. It echoed contentions that had been made with great persuasive force by Harvard’s Professor Alan Dershowitz: that under circumstances of imminent harm to thousands of moral innocents (the so-called “ticking bomb” scenario), it would be appropriate to inflict, under court-supervision, intense but non-lethal pain in an effort to wring information from a morally culpable person — a terrorist known to be complicit in the plot.
As one might predict with such a third rail, my mail was copious and indignant. Opening the door by even a sliver for torture, I was admonished, was the most reprehensible of slippery slopes. No matter how well-intentioned was the idea, no matter the lives that might be saved, no matter how certain we might be about the guilt of the detainee, the very thought that such a thing might be legal would render us no better than the savages we were fighting.
Well, lo and behold, a court-ordered torture is set to begin in Florida on Friday at 1 P.M.
It will not produce a scintilla of socially useful information. It will not save a single innocent life. It is not narrowly targeted on a morally culpable person — the torture-victim is herself as innocent as she is defenseless. It is not, moreover, meant to be brief and non-lethal: The torture will take about two excruciating weeks, and its sole and only purpose is to kill the victim.
On Friday afternoon, unless humanity intervenes, the state of Florida is scheduled to begin its court-ordered torture-murder of Terri Schiavo, whose only crime is that she is an inconvenience. A nuisance to a faithless husband grown tired of the toll on his new love interest and depleting bank account — an account that was inflated only because a jury, in 1992, awarded him over a million dollars, mostly as a trust to pay for Terri’s continued care, in a medical malpractice verdict.
In this instance, though, deafening is the only word for the silence of my former interlocutors — -civil-liberties activists characteristically set on hysteria auto-pilot the moment an al Qaeda terrorist is rumored to have been sent to bed without supper by Don Rumsfeld or Al Gonzales (something that would, of course, be rank rumor since, if you kill or try to kill enough Americans, you can be certain our government will get you three halal squares a day).
Not so Terri Schiavo. She will be starved and dehydrated. Until she is dead. By court order.
Terri is a 40-year-old woman who suffered brain damage after a diagnosed heart attack when she was 26. In state legal proceedings dominated by macabre right-to-die activists, a judge found her to be reduced to a permanent vegetative state (PVS), drawing on examinations that appear grossly inadequate to the task of what objective specialists say is a complex diagnosis. Whether she would technically be found a PVS case by a court that was honestly interested in getting a real fix on her condition — rather than breaking new ground in just how far the Left can go in deciding whose life has value — is beside the point. She is alive and, periodically, both alert and responsive.
Her parents love her and want to care for her. Imagine if you had a child who was defenseless, dependent, and vulnerable — many of us, indeed, need not imagine — and the state told you not only to step aside but that you had to watch, helpless, while it took two weeks to kill her. That’s what’s happening in Florida. Starting Friday.
On another Friday, seven years ago, Mohammed Daoud al-`Owhali and Khalfan Khamis Mohammed blew up the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing over 240 people. They were brought to the United States for trial. They were given, at public expense, multiple, highly experienced capital lawyers, and permitted extensive audiences to plead with the Justice Department not to seek the death penalty. When a capital indictment nevertheless was filed, they were given weeks of voir dire to ensure a jury of twelve people open to the notion that even the lives of mass-murderers have value. They were then given seven months of trial and sentencing proceedings, suffuse with every legal and factual presumption that their lives had worth and should be spared. And so they were.
That’s what the law says we must do for terrorists seeking to destroy our country and to slaughter us indiscriminately.
What is the law doing for Terri Schiavo?
What kind of law is it, what kind of society is it, that says the lives of Khalfan Khamis Mohammed and Mohammed Daoud al-`Owhali’s have value — over which we must anguish and for the sustenance of which we must expend tens of thousands annually — but Terri Schiavo’s is readily dispensable? By court-ordered torture over the wrenching pleas of parents ready and willing to care for her?
What kind of society goes into a lather over the imposition of bright lights and stress positions for barbarians who might have information that will save lives, but yawns while a defenseless woman who hasn’t hurt anyone is willfully starved and dehydrated? By a court — the bulwark purportedly protecting our right to life?
The torture starts Friday, at 1 P.M. Unless we do something to stop it.
— Andrew C. McCarthy, who led the 1995 terrorism prosecution against Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and eleven others, is a senior fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. |
_________________ “I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vet_supporter Lt.Jg.
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is the type of information the judge refuses to admit as evidence:
Perhaps the most dramatic affidavit is from Registered Nurse Carla Iyer. Here are some excerpts:
One time I put a wash cloth in Terri’s hand to keep her fingers from curling together, and Michael saw it and made me take it out, saying that was therapy.
Terri’s medical condition was systematically distorted and misrepresented by Michael. When I worked with her, she was alert and oriented. Terri spoke on a regular basis while in my presence, saying such things as “mommy,” and “help me.” “Help me” was, in fact, one of her most frequent utterances. I heard her say it hundreds of times. Terri would try to say the word “pain” when she was in discomfort, but it came out more like “pay.” She didn’t say the “n” sound very well. During her menses she would indicate her discomfort by saying “pay” and moving her arms toward her lower abdominal area. Other ways that she would indicate that she was in pain included pursing her lips, grimacing, thrashing in bed, curling her toes or moving her legs around. She would let you know when she had a bowel movement by flipping up the covers and pulling on her diaper and scooted in bed on her bottom.
When I came into her room and said “Hi, Terri", she would always recognize my voice and her name, and would turn her head all the way toward me, saying “Haaaiiiii” sort of, as she did. I recognized this as a “hi", which is very close to what it sounded like, the whole sound being only a second or two long. When I told her humorous stories about my life or something I read in the paper, Terri would chuckle, sometimes more a giggle or laugh. She would move her whole body, upper and lower. Her legs would sometimes be off the bed, and need to be repositioned. I made numerous entries into the nursing notes in her chart, stating verbatim what she said and her various behaviors, but by my next on-duty shift, the notes would be deleted from her chart. Every time I made a positive entry about any responsiveness of Terri’s, someone would remove it after my shift ended. Michael always demanded to see her chart as soon as he arrived, and would take it in her room with him. I documented Terri’s rehab potential well, writing whole pages about Terri’s responsiveness, but they would always be deleted by the next time I saw her chart. The reason I wrote so much was that everybody else seemed to be afraid to make positive entries for fear of their jobs, but I felt very strongly that a nurse’s job was to accurately record everything we see and hear that bears on a patient’s condition and their family. I upheld the Nurses Practice Act, and if it cost me my job, I was willing to accept that.
Here is the most amazing part of the nurse’s affidavit:
Throughout my time at Palm Gardens [one of Ms. Schiavo’s nursing homes], Michael Schiavo was focused on Terri’s death. Michael would say “When is she going to die?,” “Has she died yet?” and “When is that ***** gonna die?” These statements were common knowledge at Palm Gardens, as he would make them casually in passing, without regard even for who he was talking to, as long as it was a staff member. Other statements which I recall him making include “Can’t anything be done to accelerate her death - won’t she ever die?” When she wouldn’t die, Michael would be furious. Michael was also adamant that the family should not be given information. He made numerous statements such as “Make sure the parents aren’t contacted.” I recorded Michael’s statements word for word in Terri’s chart, but these entries were also deleted after the end of my shift. Standing orders were that the family wasn’t to be contacted, in fact, there was a large sign in the front of her chart that said under no circumstances was her family to be called, call Michael immediately, but I would call them, anyway, because I thought they should know about their daughter.
Any time Terri would be sick, like with a UTI or fluid buildup in her lungs, colds, or pneumonia, Michael would be visibly excited, thrilled even, hoping that she would die. He would say something like, “Hallelujah! You’ve made my day!” He would call me, as I was the nurse supervisor on the floor, and ask for every little detail about her temperature, blood pressure, etc., and would call back frequently asking if she was dead yet. He would blurt out “I’m going to be rich!” and would talk about all the things he would buy when Terri died, which included a new car, a new boat, and going to Europe, among other things.
http://www.patterico.com/2003/10/26/re-start-the-clock-mickey-kaus
How outrageous is this? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|