SwiftVets.com

fortdixlover · Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 3:41 am Post subject: Need Some Wood?

BUSH'S FOREIGN POLICY:

.......... NEED SOME WOOD? ..........

-- FDL

ashter · Seaman Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 185

This is great Smile

rb325th · Admiral Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 1334

Nice, but will be moving to Geedunk Shortly.
_________________
U.S. Army 1983-1995, 11C1P/11H2P NBTDT

shadowy · Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:23 am Post subject:

Fan-tastic! Loved it when he asked Charlie Gibson if he needs wood.
I don't think the libs get it that when he'd just being himself, he hits it out of the park, and when Kerry is being himself, he gives dorks a bad name.

Guest · Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:49 am Post subject:

So cool!

Rdtf · CNO Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville

they just said on FOX that factcheck.org says Bush does own a timber company?!?....

RobD · Lt.Jg. Joined: 25 Aug 2004 Posts: 147 Location: Reno Nv

I believe that any stock that Bush owns has to be in a blind trust to remove any posability of conflict of interest therefore he would most likley not know that he owned any wood.
_________________
6 Year Navy

eXcel · Seaman Joined: 23 Aug 2004 Posts: 174

Kerry knows though.. go figure.

MissPatriot · Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 7:23 am Post subject:

Actually........LOL

Some timber company donated like 86.00 to the Bush campaign.

I read somewhere...online... that the rumor started at some website called FARK. And that apparently Kerry believed it and used it. I haven't been to that website and don't particularly want to seeings how it's most likely pro-Kerry.

It wasn't on factcheck.org. There hasn't been anything posted on there since 10/6.

God Bless President Bush for a Job Well Done!
_________________
www.misspatriot.blogspot.com

Mark · Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:08 am Post subject:

It is on factcheck.org and there is extensive discussion of this in the debate thread of the main forum (starting about page 2 Cool

.
Speaking of factcheck and its seeming elevation to the mountain peak from which it dispenses all truths, I e-mailed it right after the VP debate and cited Edward's assertion that "troops on the ground in Iraq" pay a higher federal income tax rate than do the rich on dividends (15%). Folks in a combat zone have ALL income excluded from income tax liability (at least enlisted do; I am not sure if there is a cap on officer exclusion as there was in 'Nam but recall reading somewhere that cap had been lifted).
A zero rate isn't higher than a 15% rate so Edwards lied. As of my last check factcheck hasn't cited it.
Factcheck is run by Brooks Jackson, a former MSM reporter. Caution.
_________________
Retired USN Capt.; Market Time vicinity ChuLai 6/67-2/68; Maddox 8/64 Tonkin Gulf; NGFS I Corps 6-12/65; Saigon evac. 4/75.