SwiftVets.com

shawa · CNO Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004

I heard Newt on Hannity too.
He recounted the Gerry Studds case where Studds got a male page drunk and had sex with him. What we would nowadays call date rape, he said. It was not willing on the kid's part.
The Ethics Committee CONVICTED him and Newt demanded his expulsion from the House. But the Dems instead, just censored him. Newt says that when the censure was read, Studds turned his back on the speaker to show his disdain and was applauded 3 times by the Democrats!! Newt said in the following years, NANCY PELOSI on five different occasions voted for Studds to be Chairman of House Committees.
That is how much Pelosi cared about the pages!!!

Newt is IRATE that Pelosi who claims such concern is against having Louis Freeh (a skilled investigator who knows Washington well), Louis Freeh (who is now very involved with helping kids) be appointed to investigate what went on in this scandal and make recommendations on improvements to the Page program.

Newt is angry, and recommended VERY STRONGLY that every Republican in America should be calling and mailing their disgust with Pelosi obstruction to the appointment and demanding the appointment of Freeh.

Whew, Newt is HOT!!
I am sending my emails NOW.
Who the H*LL is Pelosi who supported Gerry Studds (the rapist of a page) to block the appointment of Freeh??
HYPOCRITE!!!
Time to flood her mailbox. I'm sending copy to Hastert and my own Representative as well.

Speaker Hastert http://www.house.gov/hastert/write1.shtml

Minority Leader Pelosi sf.nancy@mail.house.gov
_________________
“I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776)

Anker-Klanker · Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 11:15 pm Post subject:

As of now I think the Republicans should take advantage of the Democrat's (and their MSM mouth pieces) new-found concern for "the children." Republicans should ride this new wave of concern to:

1) Pass laws raising the age-of-consent in all states to 18.

2) Pass a law that requires Boy Scout (and Girl Scout - maintaining gender neutrality) leaders who are gay to undergo background checks.

3) Establish a Gay Watch bipartisan committee on Capital Hill with special and broad powers to investigate any and all possible gay shenanigans that might endanger "our children."

4) Pass a law that ensures that the population of gays and gay activists who work on The Hill be no more than is representative of the general population.

5) Pass a law that requires all public schools to establish Gay and Pedophile Watch committees to keep an eye on teachers (recalling all the recent revelations of teachers sexually abusing "our children").

Etc., etc. I'm sure that there are many more suggestions that could be added to the above list - all for the good of "the children." How could the Democrats possibly refuse?

streetsweeper95B · PO2 Joined: 25 Nov 2004 Posts: 365 Location: Texas

Deuce · Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:59 pm Post subject:

While not military, she is pro-gun, and Annie Coulter can sense 'dirty tricks' with the best of them, proposing we at least have the Dem's Rulebook to guide us:

"
— Boy Scouts: As gay as you want to be.

— Priests: No gays!

— Democratic politicians: Proud gay Americans.

— Republican politicians: Presumed guilty.

— White House press corps: No gays, unless they hate Bush.

— Active-duty U.S. military: As gay as possible.

— Men who date Liza Minelli: Do I have to draw you a picture, Miss Thing?"

http://www.anncoulter.org/

Deuce