SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

How do we know it was Burkett?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Truegrit
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 246
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 12:06 pm    Post subject: The CBS forgeries story isn't over Reply with quote

Eventually the CBS forgeries story will get resolved; if enough good investigative journalists work on something, just about every stone gets turned up and most of the truth gets out. Expect to see more people at CBS news coming out of the closet on this with revelations about the breakdown in accepted journalistic standards, the breakdown in CBS own internal checks and balances.

For what it's worth, here's one possibility. At some point, Burkett, the alleged source of the forged memos, may himself come forward, perhaps tempted by a lucrative book contract, to tell all -- which could mean that he will be revealing himself as the "dirty trickster" who scammed Dan Rather and CBS. The Kerry camp may try to prevent this, which may explain why the Texas attorney, Van Os, who is firmly in the Democratic camp, is representing Burkett -- to at least prevent the true story coming out until after the election. That means keeping a wrap on Burkett, to keep the truth from coming out until after the election.

If it turns out that Burkett was the source, and Mapes and Rather knew of his intensely partisan motivations (and how could they not have known?) -- which would have required CBS to be absolutely certain of the validity of the memos before going on the air -- then Rather is toast. It becomes clear, then, that his motivations were partisan, which explains the failure of CBS' checks and balances on the memos. Afterall, they failed to take seriously the skepticism of experts that they had consulted!

I believe Rather's own colleagues at 60 Minutes will eventually pressure him to come clean on this, to salvage the reputation of the program.
_________________
Ted Harwood, Ph.D.
Enlisted, U.S. Army ('57-'60)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group