|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dusty Admiral
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 1264 Location: East Texas
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:09 pm Post subject: Useful Idiots |
|
|
Here's a good look at the lineage of the Democratic pary from FDR to now.
http://federalistpatriot.us/current/
an excerpt!
Quote: |
More to the point, Soviet dictator Nikita Khrushchev said of Roosevelt's "New Deal" paradigm shift, "We can't expect the American people to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have communism."
Clearly, Khrushchev was onto something. FDR never embraced self-reliance as the essential ingredient of a free society, nor have his Demo-successors Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. Why? Perhaps it's because these men inherited their wealth, their privilege and their political office. Indeed, while Kerry's handlers might try to cast their candidate as a man of the people, he is anything but. Remember, this is a man who has twice married multimillionaire heiresses; a man who has multiple mansions on multiple continents; a man who windsurfs (poorly) off tony Nantucket; a man who rides a bicycle that costs more than some new cars; a man who spends, oh, maybe $15,000 to jet his hairdresser cross country for a trim. Yes, John Kerry is the latest in a line of "inheritance-welfare liberals" -- those who were raised dependent on inheritance rather than self-reliance. Is it any wonder, then, that the character and values of these inheritance-welfare liberals are all but indistinguishable from the character and values of those who depend on state welfare?
Today, more than 70 years after FDR seeded American socialism, the Soviet Union is but a memory. In addition, China and most other states with centralized economies (Cuba notwithstanding) are undergoing a dramatic shift toward free-enterprise -- as well as the political challenges that accompany such a shift.
Yet despite the collapse of socialism around the world, inheritance-welfare liberals, chief among them John Kerry, still dominate the Democrat Party and continue to advocate all manner of dependence upon the state (the poor man's trust fund). V.I. Lenin knew precisely what he was talking about when he famously dubbed Western Leftists "useful idiots."
As this Election Day approaches, we're left to wonder whether America has learned its lessons, or whether our great nation is still under the spell of its useful idiots. Here in our humble shop, we hope that an American majority will reject the candy of the inheritance-welfare liberals, will restore our Constitution as the central authority of the land, and will reclaim self-reliance as the central character of our people. |
I know a lot of our friends here are Democrats and I don't mean to offend them by pointing out these things but to continue to support a party that has so obviously been infiltrated and subverted by communism is beyond my comprehension.
Please folks, if you are a Democrat, please please open your mind to the truth of where your party is leading you.
Go to the Communist Party's website and compare their platform to the Democrats platform. You can't tell who wrote which.
Please understand that I'm not being personal here but I am referring to the buracracy that is the Democratc party.
I know I'd hate to be considered a 'useful idiot' to ole Lenin.
Dusty
Last edited by dusty on Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:19 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nomorelies Vice Admiral
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 977 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Has John Kerry ever had a "real" job outside of his short stint n the military, or any other jobs outside of government? Has he ever had to rely on a paycheck? Just curious. _________________ Nomorelies Make a donation HERE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would like to say that since there are so many Dems at this forum that I am sure they by now have got the message. I applaud them! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FreeFall LCDR
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 421
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I remember reading somewhere Kerry owned or ran a bakery in Boston sometime after his service. I can't find the link, otherwise I would have posted it on here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FreeFall LCDR
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 421
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
air_vet PO2
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 374
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nomorelies wrote: | Has he ever had to rely on a paycheck? |
No, he learned early to marry for money - his first wife's family had something like 300 million and of course his present wife has something like 700 million.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tacan70UDN PO2
Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 392
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
FreeFall wrote: | I remember reading somewhere Kerry owned or ran a bakery in Boston sometime after his service. I can't find the link, otherwise I would have posted it on here. |
Here's a short history of the bakery:
http://www.kilvertandforbesbakeshop.com/history.html
Kerry's not involved any more |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lance_Flatchew Ensign
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:09 am Post subject: How did the Kerry cookies crumble? |
|
|
http://www.hillnews.com/news/012804/kerry.aspx
How did the Kerry cookies crumble?
By Sam Dealey
To hear Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) tell it, his brief foray into the cookie business in the late 1970s gives him a leg up on the concerns of small-business owners. Earlier this month, the Democratic presidential candidate introduced his small-business program with vignettes from his own cookie-making experience.
Yet all that experience kind of, well, crumbles, in the mind of David Liederman, another cookie entrepreneur. Liederman, the founder of the David’s Cookies chain, claims Kerry ripped off the idea from him.
“The bottom line is he just stole it from me,” said Liederman, now a restaurateur and real estate developer in the New York City suburbs.
The Kerry campaign sharply dismissed Liederman’s charge.
file photo
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Clearly, the guy who started David’s Cookies didn’t invent cookies,” said spokesman David DiMartino. “John Kerry absolutely denies this charge.”
Kerry’s former venture serves as the backdrop for a number of campaign publicity measures designed to woo voters. In a Vogue magazine profile last year featuring the presidential candidate in surfing wear, Kerry discussed the cookie business at some length.
After dinner one night in Boston, Kerry said, he and a friend had a hankering for cookies. Their search took them to Faneuil Hall. There was no cookie store to be found, but there was an empty retail space. An idea was born, and a store soon followed. The pair named their shop, Kilvert & Forbes Ltd., after their mother’s maiden names, and eventually sold their interest when Kerry’s political career intervened.
“It was a late-night inspiration,” Kerry told Vogue. “I had always had this entrepreneurial piece of me, and I saw it as a great business opportunity.” And this experience, Kerry continued, “stood me in great stead on the [Senate] Small Business Committee.”
However, Liederman recalls a different version of how Kerry’s cookie venture crumbled.
“Some guy who called me up was John Kerry, in ’79 or ’80,” Liederman recalled. “He said he wanted to come down and talk to me about franchising. He came to the office and said he had an incredible space in Boston, which was Faneuil Hall. He said he needed some plans and some layouts and all sorts of things to get the approval of the landlord.”
“So I gave him the layout, the package, and he went back and I didn’t hear from him for six or seven months.”
Then one day Liederman got a call from someone who said they’d seen one of his stores in Faneuil Hall. Not having a store in Boston, Liederman decided to have a look for himself.
“It was a direct, 100-percent knock off of David’s Cookies,” said Liederman, from the appliances to the shop’s design to the cookies themselves. “If you had walked into a David’s Cookie’s store in Manhattan at the same time he opened ‘John’s Cookies’ in Boston, you couldn’t tell the difference.”
In his 1989 autobiography “Running Through Walls,” where the charge first appeared, Liederman wrote that he challenged Kerry on the origin of his business. “I told him he had stolen my idea, and he replied: ‘You’re absolutely right. I am a politician; I shouldn’t be in the cookie business, so let me sell you my store,’” Liederman wrote.
Liederman never bought the store, he said, because Kerry was operating it in violation of his lease. “He was supposed to be selling jams and jellies, not cookies,” he wrote.
DiMartino denied the exchange took place. “John Kerry does not recall having the conversation Mr. Liederman discusses in his book,” he said. “The facts included in Mr. Liederman’s complaint don’t match reality.”
Still, if he wants it, Kerry hasn’t quite lost Liederman’s vote.
“I’d support anybody that wasn’t Bush,” he said. “If Kerry got the nomination, I’d absolutely support him — although Bush never stole David’s Cookies from me.”
http://www.hillnews.com/news/012804/kerry.aspx _________________ http://www.tangate.com
Yes, you can lie about your war record. You can lie about spending Christmas in Cambodia. You can lie about ... atrocities of your fellow soldiers. But we are going to nail you on tangate 04. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a6502 Ensign
Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Kruschev quote reminded me of this tale:
A man walking through the desert comes across a Bedoin (sp?) outside of his tent preparing for bed.
Asked why he was not sleeping inside, as it was a cold night the traveller is informed that there is a camel in the tent.
How, wondered the traveler could a camel occupy your tent.
The Bedoin explained -
It was a very cold night, long ago, and the camel was so cold that the Bedoin felt sorry for him and let the camel stick its' nose in the tent.
Soon, the head of the camel, the forequarters, and eventually the entire camel was sleeping in the tent. This did not, of course, happen all of a sudden, but one day the Bedoin found himself out in the cold, with the camel happily sleeping in his warm tent.
--
Beware the camel's nose, for it represents creeping socialism. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|