SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Debate further illustrated that John Edwards is a

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Adrian Spidle
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 22 Sep 2004
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 1:48 pm    Post subject: The Debate further illustrated that John Edwards is a Reply with quote

The Debate further illustrated that John Edwards is a total girlie-man.

Sad Ann Coulter observed, on Fox & Friends, this morning that Edwards hand motions are very girly. I had just said the same thing to my wife a few moments before.

Earlier in the campaign I had noticed that John Edwards has a rather limp wrist while on the stump. Add to this his sometimes Nixon-like awkward wave and I'm beginning to question his manliness. This together with his carefully pretty appearance reminded me of a high school prom queen wannabe then.
After the debate, his debate style reminded me of my ex-wife. Edwards got rich by becoming an expert con man tricking juries into awarding unjustified fortunes to him and his clients. He is especially adept at conning angry women. He has never been an executive and has never run anything. No candidate in recent history has ever been so unqualified for the job he seeks.

All this not withstanding, I had already classified him as what we used to call a SNAG (Sensitive New Age Guy) who could only *** **** by the FemiNazis he hung out with if he totally suppressed his limited testosterone. Hmmm, would you want the safety of your family and nation dependent on such a wuss?
Listen, only fools (most Democrats unfortunately) vote for politicians based on their words. Astute voters look for evidence in the record to support the likelihood that the politician making all those promises can really deliver.

The records of John Kerry and John Edwards are devoid of any accomplishments or other evidence that would support their claims that they would “do better” than the Bush-Cheney team. Just saying you’re smarter doesn’t make you smarter. Being smarter doesn’t mean you could do better. These guys are a total fraud.

Kerry can at least fake manliness and might be able to be forceful in foreign relations, though I doubt it. Edwards, on the other hand, is such a total pansy that I could never envision, say Kadaffi being scared by him into canceling his WMD programs.

It is clear to me that a Kerry presidency in today’s dangerous world would cost the deaths of thousands of innocent Americans. But an Edwards presidency would probably cost the lives of millions of Americans.

These Charlatans must be defeated if America is to be safe and successful.

http://pep.typepad.com/public_enquiry_project/2004/10/the_debate_furt.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group