View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
m_drummond Lt.Jg.
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 129 Location: Dallas TX
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bean Counter Seaman Recruit
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought that the Naval Reserve either had you for 4 yrs active and 2 yrs Inactive (no Drill, just let us know your address) or 2 yrs active and 4 yrs of drill. I realize that we don't have a specific document that links Kerry to this - but I thought JFnK's non-drill status was very common. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dimsdale Captain
Joined: 20 May 2004 Posts: 527 Location: Massachusetts: the belly of the beast
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bean Counter wrote: | I thought that the Naval Reserve either had you for 4 yrs active and 2 yrs Inactive (no Drill, just let us know your address) or 2 yrs active and 4 yrs of drill. I realize that we don't have a specific document that links Kerry to this - but I thought JFnK's non-drill status was very common. |
Maybe so, but illegally negotiating with the enemy wasn't. _________________ Everytime he had a choice, Kerry chose to side with communists rather than the United States. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
openfish24 Lt.Jg.
Joined: 18 Aug 2004 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enlisted active duty is four years active 2 years inactive (no drilling)
If you join the reserves as Kerry did I do not know what his obligation was. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BuffaloJack Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 1637 Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think that the reserve policy had some flexibility in it on a case by case basis. I served 1 year active, 6 years drill, 2 years active and 2 years drill and I have friends who served 3A & 3D and 2A & 4D. So almost anything in the way of a mix was possible. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
m_drummond Lt.Jg.
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 129 Location: Dallas TX
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To me its not important if drilling was required or not. The issue is keeping the focus on Kerry and pumping up the volume. I'll take anything I can get.
________
Pissing Public
Last edited by m_drummond on Sat Mar 19, 2011 12:00 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
margie Seaman
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 187
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
is it ok to email that letter to some of the news media? I couldn't find a way to ask this question at the site. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PigBoatAndy Former Member
Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:50 am Post subject: Only about 15% of officers coming off of "Extended Acti |
|
|
My experience at two local Naval Reserve Centers was that if an officer had 2+ years of active duty - there was no requirement to drill (if you didn't drill it might keep you from making SelRes LCDR).
At the two local Reserve Centers only about 15% of the officers getting off of active duty affiliated with a drilling unit.
We had one real "hippie" LT who was frankly in it for the drill pay - he was a PhD candidate and needed the money; in fact with drill pay and the GI Bill and a minimal Teaching Assistantship - you didn't have to borrow to get through grad school.
But about 85% never affiliated with the SelRes.
About Kerry going to Paris to negotiate with the VC - the UCMJ only attaches during drill. We had a kid who was dealing drugs during the week - but not during drill and not at the ResCen - and the JAG Corps guys said "No jurisdiction."
By about '72-'73 the whole Reserve Admin shop was pretty sloppy. Ghosts showed up on the RUPPERT who never drilled - and it was impossible to drop them from the RUPPERT. (This was before the credit cards).
Also, unless you had a really hard nosed CO-XO-Admin Chief- CMAA team there was really no bullet proof way to know if the signatures on the RUPPERT were for real. That was a reason that we went to the credit with eye ball accountability.
IMHO - in the early 70's the Reserves and Guard were not really mobilizable to do what these kids are doing now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|