|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Does this information change your view of John Kerry? |
Yes, I no longer trust him. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Yes, I trust him now. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
No, I already did not trust him. |
|
100% |
[ 12 ] |
No, I still trust him. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 12 |
|
Author |
Message |
FoxURA Ensign
Joined: 19 May 2004 Posts: 63 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 10:42 pm Post subject: Iran likes Kerry deal |
|
|
*Before taking part in the poll, please take a look at the other related articles that are listed.*
*article url:
[url] http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40845[/url]
Iran likes Kerry deal
to supply nuke fuel
Islamic Republic to review 'great bargain'
but will still pursue its 'legitimate right'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 9, 2004
6:00 p.m. Eastern
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Tehran would welcome John Kerry's proposal to supply nuclear fuel, Hossein Musavian, the head Iran's Supreme National Security Council's foreign policy committee, announced today.
First outlined in a June speech, Kerry's plan to provide Iran with nuclear fuel in exchange for a pledge to use it for peaceful purposes only was unveiled to the American public during the first presidential debate.
"I think the United States should have offered the opportunity to provide the nuclear fuel, test them, see whether or not they were actually looking for it for peaceful purposes," Kerry said in a critique of the Bush administration's handling of Tehran's nuclear program, which the Iranians claim is only for civilian purposes.
"If they weren't willing to work a deal, then we could have put sanctions together," Kerry said of Tehran. "The president did nothing."
Initially, Iran rejected the idea, saying that reliance on foreign supplies would jeopardize its nuclear program.
Musavian told Reuters that Kerry's offer was also dismissed because officials could not tell if it was genuine or merely rhetoric in the U.S. presidential campaign. "If it is part of Kerry's election campaign ... we do not want to be part of it," he said. "Let the Americans play their game themselves."
But, now, the Iranians have changed their tune. Musavian says the Islamic Republic would welcome what Kerry running mate John Edwards has described as a "great bargain," and the proposal will be reviewed. Iran, however, should be allowed to pursue its "peaceful nuclear program," he made clear.
"Iran welcomes any constructive proposal from any American candidate," Musavian told Reuters. But "our legitimate right of pursuing peaceful nuclear technology should be considered," he said.
Musavian blames a history of "hostile" U.S. policies toward Iran, going back to the Reagan era, for his refusal to engage in direct talks on the nuclear issue with Washington. "It is because of 20 years of mistrust ... Up to now, Americans have not shown any sign of good will," he charged.
Edwards told the Washington Post in August that if Iran failed to take Kerry's "great bargain," it would be confirmation that the country is building nuclear weapons under the cover of developing a peaceful source of power.
WorldNetDaily has previously reported that Tehran is already engaged in an ambitious program to develop nuclear weapons to compliment its recently attained ballistic missile capabilities. According to the latest intelligence reports, Iran has decided at the highest levels of government to produce a bomb within the next four months.
Edwards assures that if Tehran accepted the proposal and subsequently cheated, Kerry could be counted upon to pull together a coalition of European allies to impose sanctions. "If we are engaging with Iranians in an effort to reach this great bargain and if, in fact, this is a bluff that they are trying to develop nuclear weapons capability, then we know that our European friends will stand with us," Edwards said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My Commentary:
Keep in mind. The policy John Kerry is proposing is almost exactly what Clinton tried to do with North Korea. As a result of Bill Clinton giving the North Koreans nuclear fuel for 'peaceful purposes', the time it took them to develop nuclear weapons was greatly reduced. Also, Iran holds some of the worlds largest oil reserves, so a cheap energy source is already available to them. In addition to this fact, North Korea has already clearly stated its desire to build nuclear weapons regardless of what any other nations want.
End Commentary.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related stories:
Money trail behind Kerry's Iran stance
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40744
Kerry would still supply Iran with nuclear fuel
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40740
Kerry: U.S. should've given nuclear fuel to Iran
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40734
Iranian leader wants nuke in 4 months
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40723
Kerry influenced by Iranian funders?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37393
Kerry taking campaign to the enemy?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37024
Related column:
Kerry on Iran
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40639 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|