|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tex Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 84
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 10:47 pm Post subject: Bill Gertz says Russia also removed chemicals from Iraq |
|
|
The Washington Times' Bill Gertz on Michael Savage's radio show...
Said the Pentagon is "working on" documents that prove Russia took chemical weapons (WMD's) from Iraq before the war... _________________ "If I must choose between righteousness and peace, I choose righteousness." -- Theodore Roosevelt
Last edited by Tex on Thu Oct 28, 2004 10:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
grumpyBB Lt.Jg.
Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Posts: 117 Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, that would be huge if we could find evidence supporting that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
I B Squidly Vice Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 879 Location: Cactus Patch
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With all their problems why would Ivan need send trucks to Iraq for explosives they don't need and Syria couldn't pay for?
Whether for diplomatic nicety vis Putin or to keep the Bush message simple Condi shot the Russky connection down early this AM on Laura Ingrahm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joeshero Commander
Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 321 Location: Midwest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
THE BIGGEST QUESTION and PUZZLE is WHY the Pentagon and CIA don't or never follow up such story? IT'S THE BIGGEST TURF and certainly REASON that can shut up all the crazy critics. But why? And why we need the New York Times and CBS to inform us about this????
Political breakdown in CIA and Pentagon? Or what?
If the stuff were removed before the war then possibly WMDs also have been removed before the war. Because as David Kay said, Iraq had the capacity to produce WMDs. Well, if Saddam had the capacity, do you think he would waited until he died to produce WMDs? _________________ All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul R. PO3
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 273 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I could be wrong here -- I think Condi was talking about the explosives, not chemical WMD. _________________ Paul R. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
joeshero Commander
Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 321 Location: Midwest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Paul R. wrote: | I could be wrong here -- I think Condi was talking about the explosives, not chemical WMD. |
Well, if the explosives were removed before the war, doesn't it make us to question whether they have also removed wmds? Quite possible. _________________ All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20041028-122637-6257r.htm
By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published October 28, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russian special forces troops moved many of Saddam Hussein's weapons and related goods out of Iraq and into Syria in the weeks before the March 2003 U.S. military operation, The Washington Times has learned.
John A. Shaw, the deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, said in an interview that he believes the Russian troops, working with Iraqi intelligence, "almost certainly" removed the high-explosive material that went missing from the Al-Qaqaa facility, south of Baghdad.
"The Russians brought in, just before the war got started, a whole series of military units," Mr. Shaw said. "Their main job was to shred all evidence of any of the contractual arrangements they had with the Iraqis. The others were transportation units."
Mr. Shaw, who was in charge of cataloging the tons of conventional arms provided to Iraq by foreign suppliers, said he recently obtained reliable information on the arms-dispersal program from two European intelligence services that have detailed knowledge of the Russian-Iraqi weapons collaboration.
Most of Saddam's most powerful arms were systematically separated from other arms like mortars, bombs and rockets, and sent to Syria and Lebanon, and possibly to Iran, he said.
The Russian involvement in helping disperse Saddam's weapons, including some 380 tons of RDX and HMX, is still being investigated, Mr. Shaw said.
The RDX and HMX, which are used to manufacture high-explosive and nuclear weapons, are probably of Russian origin, he said.
Pentagon spokesman Larry DiRita could not be reached for comment.
The disappearance of the material was reported in a letter Oct. 10 from the Iraqi government to the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Disclosure of the missing explosives Monday in a New York Times story was used by the Democratic presidential campaign of Sen. John Kerry, who accused the Bush administration of failing to secure the material.
Al-Qaqaa, a known Iraqi weapons site, was monitored closely, Mr. Shaw said.
"That was such a pivotal location, Number 1, that the mere fact of [special explosives] disappearing was impossible," Mr. Shaw said. "And Number 2, if the stuff disappeared, it had to have gone before we got there."
The Pentagon disclosed yesterday that the Al-Qaqaa facility was defended by Fedayeen Saddam, Special Republican Guard and other Iraqi military units during the conflict. U.S. forces defeated the defenders around April 3 and found the gates to the facility open, the Pentagon said in a statement yesterday.
A military unit in charge of searching for weapons, the Army's 75th Exploitation Task Force, then inspected Al-Qaqaa on May 8, May 11 and May 27, 2003, and found no high explosives that had been monitored in the past by the IAEA.
The Pentagon said there was no evidence of large-scale movement of explosives from the facility after April 6.
"The movement of 377 tons of heavy ordnance would have required dozens of heavy trucks and equipment moving along the same roadways as U.S. combat divisions occupied continually for weeks prior to and subsequent to the 3rd Infantry Division's arrival at the facility," the statement said.
The statement also said that the material may have been removed from the site by Saddam's regime.
According to the Pentagon, U.N. arms inspectors sealed the explosives at Al-Qaqaa in January 2003 and revisited the site in March and noted that the seals were not broken.
It is not known whether the inspectors saw the explosives in March. The U.N. team left the country before the U.S.-led invasion began March 20, 2003.
A second defense official said documents on the Russian support to Iraq reveal that Saddam's government paid the Kremlin for the special forces to provide security for Iraq's Russian arms and to conduct counterintelligence activities designed to prevent U.S. and Western intelligence services from learning about the arms pipeline through Syria.
The Russian arms-removal program was initiated after Yevgeny Primakov, the former Russian intelligence chief, could not persuade Saddam to give in to U.S. and Western demands, this official said.
A small portion of Iraq's 650,000 tons to 1 million tons of conventional arms that were found after the war were looted after the U.S.-led invasion, Mr. Shaw said. Russia was Iraq's largest foreign supplier of weaponry, he said.
However, the most important and useful arms and explosives appear to have been separated and moved out as part of carefully designed program. "The organized effort was done in advance of the conflict," Mr. Shaw said.
The Russian forces were tasked with moving special arms out of the country.
Mr. Shaw said foreign intelligence officials believe the Russians worked with Saddam's Mukhabarat intelligence service to separate out special weapons, including high explosives and other arms and related technology, from standard conventional arms spread out in some 200 arms depots.
The Russian weapons were then sent out of the country to Syria, and possibly Lebanon in Russian trucks, Mr. Shaw said.
Mr. Shaw said he believes that the withdrawal of Russian-made weapons and explosives from Iraq was part of plan by Saddam to set up a "redoubt" in Syria that could be used as a base for launching pro-Saddam insurgency operations in Iraq.
The Russian units were dispatched beginning in January 2003 and by March had destroyed hundreds of pages of documents on Russian arms supplies to Iraq while dispersing arms to Syria, the second official said.
Besides their own weapons, the Russians were supplying Saddam with arms made in Ukraine, Belarus, Bulgaria and other Eastern European nations, he said.
"Whatever was not buried was put on lorries and sent to the Syrian border," the defense official said.
Documents reviewed by the official included itineraries of military units involved in the truck shipments to Syria. The materials outlined in the documents included missile components, MiG jet parts, tank parts and chemicals used to make chemical weapons, the official said.
The director of the Iraqi government front company known as the Al Bashair Trading Co. fled to Syria, where he is in charge of monitoring arms holdings and funding Iraqi insurgent activities, the official said.
Also, an Arabic-language report obtained by U.S. intelligence disclosed the extent of Russian armaments. The 26-page report was written by Abdul Tawab Mullah al Huwaysh, Saddam's minister of military industrialization, who was captured by U.S. forces May 2, 2003.
The Russian "spetsnaz" or special-operations forces were under the GRU military intelligence service and organized large commercial truck convoys for the weapons removal, the official said.
Regarding the explosives, the new Iraqi government reported that 194.7 metric tons of HMX, or high-melting-point explosive, and 141.2 metric tons of RDX, or rapid-detonation explosive, and 5.8 metric tons of PETN, or pentaerythritol tetranitrate, were missing.
The material is used in nuclear weapons and also in making military "plastic" high explosive.
Defense officials said the Russians can provide information on what happened to the Iraqi weapons and explosives that were transported out of the country. Officials believe the Russians also can explain what happened to Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Listen to Bill Gertz on Michael Savage, coming up.
This is HUGE! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
msindependent Vice Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 891 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Russia must have sold Iraq the chemicals in the first place. Why else would Russia go to all the trouble to help Iraq get rid of them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gertz says Russians removed WMDs!!! They were There!!
BUSH WAS RIGHT ABOUT WMDS!
Pentagon has been working to get the documents from European
sources to Identify what weapons the Russians moved out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gertz tellsSavage that Putin was pulling a desperate CYA.
He had been supplying the weapons to Iraq and had to remove
the evidence, given the impending invasion by U.S.
Gertz says this was an operation by Russian Intelligence Agency to send in Russian Special forces first to guard the weapons and then remove them from Iraq when U.S. invasion was likely.
The Russian units were dispatched beginning in January 2003 and by March had destroyed hundreds of pages of documents on Russian arms supplies to Iraq while dispersing arms to Syria, the second official said.
Besides their own weapons, the Russians were supplying Saddam with arms made in Ukraine, Belarus, Bulgaria and other Eastern European nations, he said.
Gertz says Bush probably doesn't want to expose Putin for
diplomatic reasons. But Savage says HE BETTER IF HE'S
GOING TO KEEP HIS JOB!
Bill Gertz is an excellent investigative reporter. I have read several
of his books. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neverforget Vice Admiral
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 Posts: 875
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't read of any denial by the Russians. Anybody? _________________ US Army Security Agency
1965-1971 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shawa CNO
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Defense Dept. has released photo showing trucks at the site.
Hope they've got MORE! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|