SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Guided by hidden hands? by Linda Chavez

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
barbgeo
Ensign


Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:25 pm    Post subject: Guided by hidden hands? by Linda Chavez Reply with quote

Forgive me if I do this wrong but I'm pasting waht is an editorial in the Washington Times today by Linda Chavez

Quote:
Guided by hidden hands?
By Linda Chavez


The media are too busy repackaging old Iraq news in an October offensive against President Bush's re-election to investigate truly startling evidence unearthed this week that the Communist Party may have been directing John Kerry's anti-war activities in the early 1970s.
The evidence, contained in captured communist records on file at the Vietnam Center at Texas Tech University, shows a well-coordinated effort by the Communist Party to recruit U.S. servicemen to become part of the American anti-war movement. The objective was to organize high-profile activities to undermine support for the Vietnam War, including holding hearings on alleged war crimes, lobbying Congress to oppose the war, exploiting the families of American POWs and urging servicemen to return their service medals.

Not only did John Kerry and his group Vietnam Veterans Against the War follow this game plan, but Mr. Kerry went to Paris to meet with the communist official designated as the point of contact for guiding these activities. In June 1970, Mr. Kerry met with Mme. Binh, foreign minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government (Viet Cong) of South Vietnam and a delegate to the Paris peace talks. The documents discovered last weekend — one titled "Circular on Antiwar Movements in the U.S." — was disseminated in Vietnam in the spring of 1971, and the other titled "Directive" was captured by U.S. forces in April 1971 — are available for viewing at www.wintersoldier.com. They reveal a detailed plan to use anti-war activists in the United States as propagandists for the communist cause in Vietnam.

So why isn't the mainstream media all over this story? If Mr. Kerry — wittingly or not — was carrying out directives from Hanoi, or perhaps even Moscow, the American people have the right to know before they decide whether to elect him president on Tuesday. But the networks and major dailies were too busy covering a hysterical report that 380 tons of explosives went missing from an Iraqi depot in the early days of the U.S. invasion to inquire into Mr. Kerry's dubious activities in the anti-war movement.

On Monday, the New York Times broke the story of the purported looting of weapons from an Iraqi arms depot. "Huge Cache of Explosives Vanished From Site in Iraq" screamed the front-page Times headline, which was picked up by all the major networks and newspapers, not to mention the Kerry campaign. CBS' "60 Minutes" was also set to air a story tomorrow — two days before the election — aimed at convincing viewers that the administration had carelessly let the depot be looted of its powerful explosives, the kind that might even be used to detonate a nuclear device. "Our plan was to run the story on Oct. 31, but it became clear that it wouldn't hold," CBS executive producer Jeff Fager said in a statement.

In fact, the "missing explosives" story was more media campaign ploy than real news. There is substantial evidence that most of the explosives were either destroyed by U.S. bombing prior to the invasion or were already gone by the time U.S. troops arrived at the site on April 10, 2003, according to NBC, which had a reporter embedded with the Army's 101st Airborne Division at the time. Furthermore, the United States has already destroyed or is in the process of destroying more than 400,000 tons of similar material in Iraq, a fact conveniently ignored by much of the media.

The media rule seems to be if a story might hurt President Bush, play it up big; if it might help Mr. Bush, bury it; and if might hurt Mr. Kerry, ignore it altogether. In an election as close as this one, the media's role could be decisive. We used to expect the candidates to unleash their own October surprise in an effort to sway the voters at the last minute. Now it's the media that plays that game. Come Halloween, it's media tricks for Mr. Bush and treats for Mr. Kerry.

Linda Chavez is a nationally syndicated columnist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BuffaloJack
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1637
Location: Buffalo, New York

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Articles and editorial content need a URL reference.
Copy the http://------- out of the address box in the browser, edit your post and add it to the bottom of the post as a reference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
barbgeo
Ensign


Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:31 pm    Post subject: Here's the URL Reply with quote

I knew I was screwing something up with my last post--but here is the URL to the article

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spiess
Lieutenant


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
lrb111
Captain


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 508

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

an assist directly to the article, for barbgeo.
http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20041029-083537-8463r.htm
_________________
said Democratic Chairman Terry McAuliffe. "It is inexcusable to mock service and sacrifice."
well, when even the DNC can see it,,,,, then kerry is toast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Truegrit
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 246
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:15 pm    Post subject: Thanks for the posting Reply with quote

Thanks for alerting us to this. It puts the matter well, precisely as I have argued. The MSM have purposely neglected one of the most important stories of this campaign, the issue involving Kerry's ties to the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese.

Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda chief, couldn't have done it better -- in bring the media around to the Nazi point of view (which in Germany at the time was "Gleichshaltung" -- coordination of German institutions to Nazi rule and dictates). The MSM, however, is voluntarily coordinating with the Kerry campaign strategy because of existing ideological bias.

The failure to investigate Kerry's Paris activities represents a monumental failure of responsibility on the part of the American liberal media.
_________________
Ted Harwood, Ph.D.
Enlisted, U.S. Army ('57-'60)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Truegrit
Lieutenant


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 246
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:17 pm    Post subject: Hit the NYT with this posting Reply with quote

You can email a copy of Linda Chavez's WT op ed to the NYT"

Attn: Daniel Okrent
public@nytimes.com .

You can also hit the Boston Globe's ombudsman with a copy of her op ed.

ombud@globe.com

Without massive public pressure, the MSM will continue to advance their left-of-center political, ideological agenda.
_________________
Ted Harwood, Ph.D.
Enlisted, U.S. Army ('57-'60)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DoGooder
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 102

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just wanted to let folks know, I sent a copy of the article the most of the weblogs posted by NavyMom and I on the All Hands on Deck discussion.

Any others you think appropriate,...please distribute.

NavyMom, do you have a master email list for the townhall folks?

If anyone has an email list, can you email it to me at truefforte@yahoo.com for future efforts?

Thanks,

Do Gooder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Uisguex Jack
Rear Admiral


Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 613

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This topic of communist guidance to Kerry in the 70's is what first brought me here to this forum.

This is another article on the same topic yet from a more damming angle, at least for me. It was posted here on this web site:

http://www2.swiftvets.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1450&start=0

Here's the article: Kerry’s Soviet Rhetoric
The Vietnam-era antiwar movement got its spin from the Kremlin.


— Ion Mihai Pacepa was acting chief of Romania's espionage service and national-security adviser to the country's president. He is the highest-ranking intelligence officer ever to have defected from the former Soviet bloc.

By Ion Mihai Pacepa

Part of Senator John Kerry's appeal to a certain segment of Americans is his Vietnam-veteran status coupled with his antiwar activism during that period. On April 12, 1971, Kerry told the U.S. Congress that American soldiers claimed to him that they had, "raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned on the power, cut off limbs, blew up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan."

The exact sources of that assertion should be tracked down. Kerry also ought to be asked who, exactly, told him any such thing, and what it was, exactly, that they said they did in Vietnam. Statutes of limitation now protect these individuals from prosecution for any such admissions. Or did Senator Kerry merely hear allegations of that sort as hearsay bandied about by members of antiwar groups (much of which has since been discredited)? To me, this assertion sounds exactly like the disinformation line that the Soviets were sowing worldwide throughout the Vietnam era. KGB priority number one at that time was to damage American power, judgment, and credibility. One of its favorite tools was the fabrication of such evidence as photographs and "news reports" about invented American war atrocities. These tales were purveyed in KGB-operated magazines that would then flack them to reputable news organizations. Often enough, they would be picked up. News organizations are notoriously sloppy about verifying their sources. All in all, it was amazingly easy for Soviet-bloc spy organizations to fake many such reports and spread them around the free world.

As a spy chief and a general in the former Soviet satellite of Romania, I produced the very same vitriol Kerry repeated to the U.S. Congress almost word for word and planted it in leftist movements throughout Europe. KGB chairman Yuri Andropov managed our anti-Vietnam War operation. He often bragged about having damaged the U.S. foreign-policy consensus, poisoned domestic debate in the U.S., and built a credibility gap between America and European public opinion through our disinformation operations. Vietnam was, he once told me, "our most significant success."

The KGB organized a vitriolic conference in Stockholm to condemn America's aggression, on March 8, 1965, as the first American troops arrived in south Vietnam. On Andropov's orders, one of the KGB's paid agents, Romesh Chandra, the chairman of the KGB-financed World Peace Council, created the Stockholm Conference on Vietnam as a permanent international organization to aid or to conduct operations to help Americans dodge the draft or defect, to demoralize its army with anti-American propaganda, to conduct protests, demonstrations, and boycotts, and to sanction anyone connected with the war. It was staffed by Soviet-bloc undercover intelligence officers and received about $15 million annually from the Communist Party's international department — on top of the WPC's $50 million a year, all delivered in laundered cash dollars. Both groups had Soviet-style secretariats to manage their general activities, Soviet-style working committees to conduct their day-to-day operations, and Soviet-style bureaucratic paperwork. The quote from Senator Kerry is unmistakable Soviet-style sloganeering from this period. I believe it is very like a direct quote from one of these organizations' propaganda sheets.

The KGB campaign to assault the U.S. and Europe by means of disinformation was more than just a few Cold War dirty tricks. The whole foreign policy of the Soviet-bloc states, indeed its whole economic and military might, revolved around the larger Soviet objective of destroying America from within through the use of lies. The Soviets saw disinformation as a vital tool in the dialectical advance of world Communism.

The Stockholm conference held annual international meetings up to 1972. In its five years of existence it created thousands of "documentary" materials printed in all the major Western languages describing the "abominable crimes" committed by American soldiers against civilians in Vietnam, along with counterfeited pictures. All these materials were manufactured by the KGB's disinformation department. I would print up these materials in hundreds of thousands of copies each.

The Romanian DIE (Ceausescu's secret police) was tasked to distribute these KGB-concocted "incriminating documents" all over Western Europe. And ordinary people often bought it hook, line, and sinker. "Even Attila the Hun looks like an angel when compared to these Americans," a West German businessman reprovingly told me after reading one such report.

The Italian, Greek, and Spanish Communist parties serviced by Bucharest were much affected by this material and their activists regularly distributed translations. They also handed them out to the participants at anti-American demonstrations around the world.

Many "Ban-the-Bomb" and anti-nuclear movements were KGB-funded operations, too. I can no longer look at a petition for world peace or other supposedly noble cause, particularly of the anti-American variety, without thinking to myself, "KGB."

In 1978, when I broke with Communism, my DIE was propagating the line that Washington's adventure in Vietnam had wasted over $200 trillion. This waste, we warned darkly, would soon generate European inflation, recession, and unemployment.

As far as I'm concerned, the KGB gave birth to the antiwar movement in America. In 1976, Andropov gave my own Romanian DIE credit for helping his KGB do so.

Leftist intellectuals in America now look to Europe — steeped for years in anti-American propaganda from the Soviet Union — for "a sane and frank European criticism of the Bush administration's war policy." Indeed, anti-Americanism in Europe today is almost as ferocious as it was during Vietnam. France and Germany insist we are torturing the al Qaeda prisoners held at Guantanamo Base. The Mirror, a British newspaper, is confident that President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair were "killing innocents in Afghanistan." The Paris daily Le Monde put Jean Baudrillard on its front page asserting that "the Judeo-Christian West, led by America, not only provoked the [September 11] terrorist attacks, it actually desired them."

In June 2002, a documentary film on "U.S. war crimes" in Afghanistan was shown in the German Bundestag by the crypto-Communist Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS). The film faithfully reincarnated the style of old Soviet-bloc "documentaries" demonizing the U.S. war in Vietnam. According to this 20-minute movie, American soldiers were involved in the torture and murder of some 3,000 Taliban prisoners in the region of Mazar-e-Sharif. One witness in the film even claimed he had seen an American soldier break the neck of one Afghan prisoner and pour acid on others.

During my last meeting with Andropov, he said, wisely, "now all we have to do is to keep the Vietnam-era anti-Americanism alive." Andropov was a shrewd judge of human nature. He understood that in the end our original involvement would be forgotten, and our insinuations would take on a life of their own. He knew well that it was just the way human nature worked.




And This man John Kerry is asking you to vote for him as the Comander in Chief of the most powerfull nation on earth?

I don't think so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dimsdale
Captain


Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 527
Location: Massachusetts: the belly of the beast

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The media rule seems to be if a story might hurt President Bush, play it up big; if it might help Mr. Bush, bury it; and if might hurt Mr. Kerry, ignore it altogether.


From the infamous and unreported Mark Halperin memo:

Quote:
It goes without saying that the stakes are getting very high for the country and the campaigns - and our responsibilities become quite grave

I do not want to set off (sp?) and endless colloquy that none of us have time for today - nor do I want to stifle one. Please respond if you feel you can advance the discussion.

The New York Times (Nagourney/Stevenson) and Howard Fineman on the web both make the same point today: the current Bush attacks on Kerry involve distortions and taking things out of context in a way that goes beyond what Kerry has done.

Kerry distorts, takes out of context, and mistakes all the time, but these are not central to his efforts to win.

We have a responsibility to hold both sides accountable to the public interest, but that doesn't mean we reflexively and artificially hold both sides "equally" accountable when the facts don't warrant that.

I'm sure many of you have this week felt the stepped up Bush efforts to complain about our coverage. This is all part of their efforts to get away with as much as possible with the stepped up, renewed efforts to win the election by destroying Senator Kerry at least partly through distortions.

It's up to Kerry to defend himself, of course. But as one of the few news organizations with the skill and strength to help voters evaluate what the candidates are saying to serve the public interest. Now is the time for all of us to step up and do that right.



Can you imagine the uproar if Brit Hume had written such a memo?
_________________
Everytime he had a choice, Kerry chose to side with communists rather than the United States.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rhv5862
PO2


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 379
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:20 pm    Post subject: Guided by Hidden Hands Reply with quote

There is no way that any MSM outlet would report this. Goes against Kerry and MSM does not want that known.

RHV
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DoGooder
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 102

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We don't need the Old Media to start the story. They will have to follow if the noise and outrage gets loud enough.

We got the story on Little Green Footballs, a top 5 web log site.
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=13351_Kerrys_October_Surprise#comments

I think we should try to get better coverage at Instapundit. Its the number 1 website not supporting Kerry and has more than 200,000 readings a day.

Can we all write to him at pundit@instpundit.com and ask him to look into the Kerry Commie story?

Also, Powerline is a top ten weblog. I don't think they have covered the story...as far as I can recall. They are at powerlinefeedback@gmail.com

Get the facts and please write them!!

Thanks

Do Gooder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shadowy
Commander


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 301
Location: St. Louis, MO

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 8:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Guided by hidden hands? by Linda Chavez Reply with quote

Quote:
Guided by hidden hands?
By Linda Chavez


The media are too busy repackaging old Iraq news in an October offensive against President Bush's re-election to investigate truly startling evidence unearthed this week that the Communist Party may have been directing John Kerry's anti-war activities in the early 1970s.


Linda Chavez is a nationally syndicated columnist.
[/quote]

To the everlasting disgrace of the profession of journalism, this era's media coverage of the news will make the Yellow Journalism era pale by comparison into a highly forgettable off-white moment. I hope that the story of the Propaganda Period in American journalism is even now being written by more skillful professionals than can be found in the ranks of the OIM. It must be written at every grade level, to be taught in every school, so that future generations will know how Americans worked for America's downfall and thought they were being heroic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group