SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

REPUBLICANS HAVE DEMOCRATS OVER A BARREL

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
God and Country
PO3


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Posts: 274
Location: God's country

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:03 am    Post subject: REPUBLICANS HAVE DEMOCRATS OVER A BARREL Reply with quote

Republicans have Democrats over a "barrel." by Deborah Orin

THE United Nations looms as a new hot political issue, thanks to the exploding revelations of corruption of its oil-for-food program — and that spells more trouble for a Democratic Party still reeling from its Nov. 2 election losses.
Why? Because Democrats tend to reflexively back the United Nations — that's what 2004 loser John Kerry did, suggesting that a corrupt U.N. that cheerfully let Saddam Hussein rip off $21.3 billion could be trusted more than President Bush in Iraq.

"The idea that we need the U.N. to help us was certainly not a popular thing in focus groups that I watched this fall," dryly remarks senior Democratic strategist Anita Dunn.

"Democrats first and foremost need to make it clear that they have a commitment to protect this country's security regardless of what other countries say. We live in a dangerous world at a dangerous time — and I'm not sure our party communicated that."

If Dems don't watch it, they'll all land with Kerry on the wrong side of the exploding scandal over the $21.3 billion rip-off plus what U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan knew about secret payments to his son and when he knew it.

Republican pollster Jim McLaughlin puts it this way: "Kofi Annan has run the U.N. like Tony Soprano — and when voters realize it, they're going to be really angry."

He contends some news outlets, like CBS and The New York Times, have downplayed the scandal because they are reflexively pro-U.N., just like most reporters. But even they are starting to have to cover it — and congressional probers of both parties say what's out so far is only the tip of the iceberg.

http://www.nypost.com/commentary/21073.htm

God bless America.

Razz Razz Razz Razz Razz Razz Razz Razz
_________________
Conservative and proud
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GIaunt
Seaman


Joined: 08 Oct 2004
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fox has had several shows covering Oil-for-Food and it is a REAL scandal. First Kofi says his son didn't get paid from the oversight company. Then when the reporters proved his son was receiving $, Kofi, says, "Oh, I didn't know...."

does this sound like the definition of "is" to anyone?

Kofi Annan MUST GO.... And most of his staff..... Its time to CLEAN House....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gmez2001
PO3


Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 274

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 1:52 pm    Post subject: MSM Reply with quote

Proof of MSM manipulation.

This story is so OLD,OLD,OLD on conservative radio--late 01 or early 02.
_________________
Tin Can Gunline Vietnam
2nd generation Navy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ocsparky101
PO1


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 479
Location: Allen Park. Michigan

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On Hanity and Combs last night they had Bechel on. He suggested Anan step down and Bill Clinton take over the position. Sean near threw up all over the desk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
scotty61
LCDR


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 419
Location: Glyndon MN

PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ocsparky101 wrote:
On Hanity and Combs last night they had Bechel on. He suggested Anan step down and Bill Clinton take over the position. Sean near threw up all over the desk.


When the guy in charge steps down in disgrace over a scandal, you want a squeaky clean guy to take his place in order to restore credibility to the institution. This is been accepted damage control for a long time. For this Bechel guy to suggest Clinton is;
1. wishful thinking.
2. he wants the UN to fail
3. dumb and I mean nose-picking, mouth-breathing dumb.
_________________
John Kerry. A Neville Chamberlain for our times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group