SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Media Are Easy Marks

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
shawa
CNO


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 2004

PostPosted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 1:17 pm    Post subject: Media Are Easy Marks Reply with quote

Jack Kelly is a good journalist who tells it like it is!
However, instead of calling MSM 'easy marks' I would brand
them 'willing accomplices'!!!

http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050205/COLUMNIST14/502050330/-1/NEWS17

by Jack Kelly
Saturday, February 5, 2005

Media Are Easy Marks

HISTORY repeats itself, Karl Marx said, "first as tragedy, second as farce."
In the days immediately following Iraq's historic election, two videotapes from "insurgent" groups were distributed to the news media. One purported to show an American soldier being held hostage. The second purported to show that a British C-130 transport aircraft, which crashed on election day, had been shot down by a surface-to-air missile.

The "American soldier" was Cody, a G.I. Joe action figure. This is obvious from the picture, but the Associated Press and CNN bit hard.

The cause of the C-130 crash is still being investigated. But experts at Jane's Defence Weekly have doubts about the claim of "insurgents."

"The missile footage has just been grafted onto the front," said editor Peter Felstead. "And it looks like a surface to surface missile to me."

Other experts note the wreckage footage was shot in daylight, while the C-130 crashed just before nightfall. It is highly improbable "insurgents" could have been on the scene before the sun set, and there were British soldiers all around the next morning.

Media outlets that were quick to report the insurgents' claims had little to say about the hoaxes. Nor did they speculate on what the hoaxes might mean.

Last Sunday's election demonstrated the massive support of the Iraqi people for democracy, and the relative impotence of the "insurgents." The "river of blood" they promised was barely a trickle.

Eight suicide bombers killed 36 Iraqis besides themselves. Of these, seven were foreigners (six Saudis and a Sudanese). The only Iraqi suicide bomber was a child suffering from Down syndrome. That is, as the Iraqi writer Nibras Kazimi put it, "eight against 8 million." And on what basis, one might ask, do the media call seven foreign terrorists "insurgents"?

The terrorists had to do something to revive their plummeting prestige. That they resorted to clumsy frauds is not a sign of strength.

"The captured toy story could be pretty significant," said the Web logger John Hinderaker (Power Line). "The terrorists need, more than anything else, to be seen as awesome, terrible figures. If they stop inspiring fear, they are finished. So the one thing they cannot stand is ridicule. Their pathetic effort to pass a doll off as a captured American soldier will [make] them laughingstocks throughout the Arab world."

It's also interesting that the terrorists turned to the news media to recover lost momentum. Journalists who fell for these hoaxes may merely be idiots, and their silence about the implications of the hoaxes may simply be the by-product of embarrassment. But more to the point, why are major media so quick to disseminate anything that a terrorist group, or purported terrorist group, releases? For the terrorist, it is like being given millions of dollars in free advertising.

The major media have from the beginning exaggerated the strength and popularity of those they mislabel "insurgents," to the disgust of American soldiers.

"I'm tired of hearing the crap, the whole, well 'We are barely hanging on, we're losing, the insurgency is growing,'●" Marine Sgt. Kevin Lewis told Dan Rather, in Iraq for the election. "It's just a small amount of people out there causing the problems. It's a small number, and we're killing them."

The scandalous remarks of Eason Jordan, CNN's top news executive, last week at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and the failure of the major media to report them suggest the distortions are deliberate.

Mr. Jordan told a panel that the U.S. military had killed a dozen journalists in Iraq, and that they had been deliberately targeted. When challenged, Mr. Jordan could provide no evidence to support the charge, and subsequently lied about having made it, though the record shows he had made a similar charge a few months before, and also earlier had falsely accused the Israeli military of targeting journalists.

Mr. Jordan's slander has created a firestorm in the blogosphere, but has yet to be mentioned in the "mainstream" media.

Gee, I wonder why not.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Kelly is a member of The Blade’s national bureau.
» E-mail him at jkelly@post-gazette.com
» Read more Jack Kelly columns at www.toledoblade.com/jackkelly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GM Strong
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 1579
Location: Penna

PostPosted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Add "shills" to the list. They want to believe this stuff. Dan Blather is a prime example.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Poole
Vice Admiral


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 914
Location: America

PostPosted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shawa wrote:
...The major media have from the beginning exaggerated the strength and popularity of those they mislabel "insurgents,"...

Their agenda is transparent. First, they called them criminals and maligned and humiliated anyone who labeled them combatants. Then Dan-the-Marine lied and forged documents to promote their agenda. Now they call them insurgents and race each other to publish stuff that makes the current administration look bad. Next, they'll be calling them victims of murder.

In fact, the old media now is irrelevant and should be ignored. They've utterly failed in their constitutionally charged mission and are paying the price that ultimately will be their complete undoing. Currently, I limit CBS and the rest of the old media to sports (with radio narrative if I can get it). For news, I go to the internet. I know I have many allies in my approach to their shameful shenanigans.
_________________
'58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DLI78
PO3


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 273

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As of tonight, Dan Rather is standing by the story that PFC Cody IS being held hostage by insurgents, and that C-130 was brought down by a missle. SeeBS has obtained an interview with the driver of the brother of the guy who sold the surface-to-air missle to the insurgent who gave it to his best friend's brother-in-law who handed it to the guy who fired it.

CBS head Les Moonves has already decided, according to info leaked by SeeBS insiders, that Rather's personal coffee bearer and two administrative assistants will take the fall for these stories when SeeBS can no longer credibly back them (defined as when even Boxer and Kennedy decide that dang-it-all this one is wrong also).

But IT COULD HAVE BEEN TRUE!!!!!!

"And that's part of our world tonight."
_________________
DLI 78
Army Linguist
1978-1986
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group