View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sailor in the Desert Ensign
Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 57 Location: Fabulous Las Vegas
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 12:09 pm Post subject: Filibusters, Then and Now |
|
|
Filibusters, Then and Now
Published: March 10, 2005
SOURCE
To the Editor:
"The Senate on the Brink" (editorial, March 6) supports the "historic role of the filibuster," which is a curious position for a newspaper that 10 years ago said filibusters were "the tool of the sore loser" and should be eliminated ("Time to Retire the Filibuster," editorial, Jan. 1, 1995).
Federal judicial appointments have certainly been controversial, but surely all Americans can agree that the rules for confirming judges should be the same regardless of which party has a majority.
Now you praise the filibuster as a "time-honored Senate procedure." In 1995, when Bill Clinton was president, you called it "an archaic rule that frustrates democracy and serves no useful purpose."
You disparage the Republicans' view that 51 votes should be enough for judicial confirmation. Yet the 51-vote rule is a consistent Senate tradition. By calling for an end to filibusters, the Senate is simply contemplating restoring its traditions by traditional methods you disparage as "nuclear," even though they were once endorsed by such leading Democrats as Senators Edward M. Kennedy, Charles E. Schumer and Robert C. Byrd.
John Cornyn
U.S. Senator from Texas
Washington, March 7, 2005
Lookd like the Times has been caught with their hypocritical pants down _________________ People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GM Strong Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 18 Sep 2004 Posts: 1579 Location: Penna
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Regarding Grand Keagle KKK Byrd.
Significantly, he has voted against the nominations of both Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas, recognized as men of a certain racial classification. Mr. Byrd, an explanation please.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act was filibustered in a record marathon orchestrated in part by Sen. Byrd. Is this the tradition your speak of Mr. Byrd? Please explain.
I refer to my previous posting as to why there is no longer filibustering in the House of Representatives. Reed's Rules courtesy of a Republican Speaker in 1890 who risked his career and made signicant change in the face of extreme hostility from..........DEMOCRATS. Time for Senator Frist to step up. _________________ 8th Army Korea 68-69 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sailor in the Desert Ensign
Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 57 Location: Fabulous Las Vegas
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GM Strong wrote: | Regarding Grand Keagle KKK Byrd.
Significantly, he has voted against the nominations of both Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas, recognized as men of a certain racial classification. Mr. Byrd, an explanation please.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act was filibustered in a record marathon orchestrated in part by Sen. Byrd. Is this the tradition your speak of Mr. Byrd? Please explain.
I refer to my previous posting as to why there is no longer filibustering in the House of Representatives. Reed's Rules courtesy of a Republican Speaker in 1890 who risked his career and made signicant change in the face of extreme hostility from..........DEMOCRATS. Time for Senator Frist to step up. |
I have had a few things to say on the blog about KKK Byrd and his hypocricy and racism. _________________ People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kman Lt.Jg.
Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 132 Location: Diamond Bar, Ca.
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:01 pm Post subject: Re: Filibusters, Then and Now |
|
|
Sailor in the Desert wrote: | Filibusters, Then and Now
By calling for an end to filibusters, the Senate is simply contemplating restoring its traditions by traditional methods you disparage as "nuclear," even though they were once endorsed by such leading Democrats as Senators Edward M. Kennedy, Charles E. Schumer and Robert C. Byrd.
|
Can somone PLEASE find the quote of them saying that? No luck so far on this end.
Kurt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sailor in the Desert Ensign
Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 57 Location: Fabulous Las Vegas
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:22 pm Post subject: Re: Filibusters, Then and Now |
|
|
kman wrote: | Sailor in the Desert wrote: | Filibusters, Then and Now
By calling for an end to filibusters, the Senate is simply contemplating restoring its traditions by traditional methods you disparage as "nuclear," even though they were once endorsed by such leading Democrats as Senators Edward M. Kennedy, Charles E. Schumer and Robert C. Byrd.
|
Can somone PLEASE find the quote of them saying that? No luck so far on this end.
Kurt |
Try here. _________________ People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sailor in the Desert Ensign
Joined: 11 Mar 2005 Posts: 57 Location: Fabulous Las Vegas
|
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a new update on this with a link to Orin Hatch's Senate floor speech. _________________ People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|