View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Navy_Navy_Navy Admin
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 5777
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I'm not mistaken, you'd get the same kind of attributes for a document if you used Paint Shop Pro or MS Paint as the scanner for your document, so the Photoshop attributes listed may not indicate anything, at least not yet.
Try making a pdf file from a document scanned with Photoshop and see what happens. I don't have Photoshop any more, but I do have Acrobat and its distiller function if I can help. _________________ ~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Essayons Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 81 Location: Philadelphia area
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have posted an update that comes very close to replicating Kerry’s 1978 discharge:
http://15thengineer.50megs.com/kerry_1.htm
There have been PMs and posts stating that I should contact Hannity but I want to make sure that there is agreement that what I have produced is acceptable to you all before I make waves. I was not able to produce an overlay – I do not remember how to do it.
I will e-mail anyone who knows how to do an overlay my latest version of the Kerry discharge document. It will not be an absolute 1 to 1 match but it should scare the sheet out of Kerry.
Kerry has stated that he has signed a DD180. Hey, it can be done online! And it would save him finding an envelope and stamp.
Will the BS never end?
Regards,
Dick _________________ Essayons - Let us try - the code of the Army Engineer. Sappers First, the code of the Combat Engineer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Me#1You#10 Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 6503
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Certainly not my area of expertise, but can it be done using .gif and transparency? NNN? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Navy_Navy_Navy Admin
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 5777
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, the overlay would be made with a transparent gif or a png - the gif will produce a smaller file size.
You'd then copy the transparent gif and paste as a transparent layer over the top of the original.
To make the differences and similarities stand out, I think you'd want to use a vivid color font in the transparency? _________________ ~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Essayons Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 81 Location: Philadelphia area
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, I have the replicated Kerry document in MS Word.
Tell me how to go from that to a .gif transparency.
Regards,
Dick _________________ Essayons - Let us try - the code of the Army Engineer. Sappers First, the code of the Combat Engineer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
I B Squidly Vice Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 879 Location: Cactus Patch
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
? Transparent in GIF looks magenta on the extended pallette and you'ld use it for the white background.
Recommend a different format. PhotoShop masques allow a variety of overlays. Alternately put text in a contrasting color and and turn down the 'opacity' _________________ "KILL ALL THE LAWYERS!"
-Wlm Shakespeare |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Essayons Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 81 Location: Philadelphia area
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Huh? I am a degreed engineer and I have no idea what the he!! you are all talking about.
I have a document in MS Word. Tell me step by step how to convert it to a transperant .gif.
Maybe GenrXr can help with his gaming knowledge. Me#1 don't hesitate to throw in your knowledge - as you know it can be done.
Simple problem folks - MS Word document - how to create a .gif with a transparent background from it.
Simple problem so many say but who can provide the answer?
RESULTS are preferred.
Regards,
Dick
Regards,
Dick _________________ Essayons - Let us try - the code of the Army Engineer. Sappers First, the code of the Combat Engineer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SBD Admiral
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Posts: 1022
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is from an old post with the example of using Photoshop and the Official Record Copy.
I have found something interesting in John Kerry's "Official Record Copy" documents. There are about 6 PDF's that have "file://D:/viewDocument.html" dated 3-10-2004. This means that the document was created from a web browser and the viewDocument.html page.
If the document was from an actual original, there is no reason to put it into an HTML page to convert it to a PDF. The "file://D:/viewDocument.html" shows up because whoever made the document did not remove the Header and Footer settings located under file-->Page Setup in Internet Explorer.
Link to Pages in Question.
http://www.swiftboatarchives.com/docfile/JohnKerryMilitaryRecords-1.pdf
http://www.swiftboatarchives.com/docfile/JohnKerryMilitaryRecords-2.pdf
It's possible that they used a background image for transparency purposes that had the "Official Record Copy".
I made one of the CBS docs using this background as an illustration.
Here is the HTML page
http://www.swiftboatarchives.com/DocumentView.html
Here is the PDF produced
http://www.swiftboatarchives.com/DocumentPages.pdf
I would be interested to know if anyone can explain the reason for the HTML to PDF conversion.
SBD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SBD Admiral
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Posts: 1022
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SBD Admiral
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Posts: 1022
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, here is the original with Times New Roman PS MT font from Photoshop on top of the original text.
Here is a PDF
http://66.135.39.97/discharge2.pdf
SBD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Me#1You#10 Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 6503
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SBD...
The jpg doesn't do this justice but the pdf magnifies extremely well. Now, to this untrained eye it still doesn't quite match up font-wise eg. the number 6 nor does, I think, the kerning? (and does that matter?)
For the benefit of all, what, exactly, are we looking for here? What standard are we using to determine whether there is cause for legitimate pursuit of this issue? IOW, at what point would a professional document analyzer say "hmmmm"? Or, considering the source and the issue, should ANY Kerry document proffered be suspect and subjected to authenticity analysis? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Navy_Navy_Navy Admin
Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 5777
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Me#1You#10 wrote: | SBD...
The jpg doesn't do this justice but the pdf magnifies extremely well. Now, to this untrained eye it still doesn't quite match up font-wise eg. the number 6 nor does, I think, the kerning? (and does that matter?) |
I think that the differences might be accounted for by the version of the word processor (or even the operating system) used to try to replicate the original, so it is important, but I'm not a typologist, so just
how important, I wouldn't even hazard a guess.
Not an expert here - but I will say that the degree of alignment alone is VERY interesting and sure needs a closer look by an expert.
Quote: | Or, considering the source and the issue, should ANY Kerry document proffered be suspect and subjected to authenticity analysis? |
Honestly, I think that's probably the best course of action - starting with documents such as this, which have such interesting (spelled s-u-s-p-e-c-t )characteristics and moving on to every other document he's ever provided to the public. (Especially when they can be compared to the documents which were retrieved from the archives by Navy Wife and others, this could be a lot of fun.)
How to generate interest in these documents, though? The last thing we want to do is jump the gun and say, "We've got a smoking gun/Dan rATher here,"only to find out that there is a perfectly legitimate explanation for it. Credibility takes a nose dive, and that, we must avoid at all costs.
Does anyone know someone who could compare and give a reasonably expert assessment? I think the powerblog was the original break on the Blather forgeries - they had contacts with experts - but, I'm old and the memory cells don't fire the way they used to - was it someone else?
IMO, there's certainly enough here to be worth a serious look, if anyone knows someone.
. _________________ ~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Essayons Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 81 Location: Philadelphia area
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As I stated in an earlier post, I believe there is a possibility that the text was generated in Photoshop and not MS Word. I chose to pursue the MS Word possibility.
I have taken MS Word as far as it will go. MS Word kerning was of no help as it only allows basic kerning of certain standard character combinations (i.e. “th” and some others).
Photoshop does allow for “optical” kerning which far exceeds the capability of MS Word. And Photoshop would allow for the insertion of foreign text characters such as the “6” mentioned by Me#1.
Unfortunately this is not the simple MS Word attempt that was made with the Dan Blather documents.
I am sure SBD is working the problem.
Regards,
Dick _________________ Essayons - Let us try - the code of the Army Engineer. Sappers First, the code of the Combat Engineer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Essayons Seaman Apprentice
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 81 Location: Philadelphia area
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
To view some preliminary work I did in Photoshop please visit:
http://15thengineer.50megs.com/kerry_1.htm
The second thumbnail is an overlay of the Kerry document (red text over the original text) of selected text that I tried to replicate.
It is pretty much a 1 to 1 match - excluding the odd characters "C" and "6" which I have not tried to replicate.
What it proves, other than the fact that I can and will reproduce the entire document text, I do not know as I had to manipulate, at times, individual words of the text using kerning and tracking.
The capabilities of Photoshop are so powerful that I am not sure I would believe anything reproduced with Photoshop. That is why I stayed with MS Word early on - but it did not pan out.
Regards,
Dick _________________ Essayons - Let us try - the code of the Army Engineer. Sappers First, the code of the Combat Engineer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kate Admin
Joined: 14 May 2004 Posts: 1891 Location: Upstate, New York
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Navy_Navy_Navy wrote: |
Does anyone know someone who could compare and give a reasonably expert assessment? I think the powerblog was the original break on the Blather forgeries - they had contacts with experts - but, I'm old and the memory cells don't fire the way they used to - was it someone else?
IMO, there's certainly enough here to be worth a serious look, if anyone knows someone. | re the Blather forgeries
The Origin of the Story > Freerepublic > powerline > littlegreenfootballs > blogosphere
and our own ASPB got the ball rolling here
this post in ASPB’s thread gives a gives a link to one font expert/blogger _________________ .
one of..... We The People |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|