View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rdtf CNO
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:00 pm Post subject: Supreme Court Bars Ten Commandments From Courthouses |
|
|
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160781,00.html
Supreme Court Bars Commandments From Courthouses
Monday, June 27, 2005
By Jane RohWASHINGTON - A divided Supreme Court on Monday struck down Ten Commandments displays in two Kentucky courthouses, but said a 6-foot granite replica on government land in Texas was acceptable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rdtf CNO
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2209 Location: BUSHville
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By the way - what do they plan to do with the courthouses in America that have the Ten Commandments sculptured on the building, walls... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
coldwarvet Admiral
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 1125 Location: Minnetonka, MN
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps they will cover them up with portraits of communist leaders like Bill Clinton. _________________ Defender of the honor of those in harms way keeping us out of harms way.
"Peace is our Profession"
Strategic Air Command - Motto
USAF 75-79 Security Police |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GM Strong Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 18 Sep 2004 Posts: 1579 Location: Penna
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two convoluted decisions. OK on Gummint propitty, but not in the buildings. I think they were looking over their shoulders at the inscriptions on the SCOTUS Bldg. and waffled. We need to proceed with appointing Originalists and get the Clintinoids off the bench.
Classic dissent by Scalia on the Kentucky case:
Another Classic Scalia Dissent
[Edward Whelan 06/27 11:39 AM]
In the Kentucky 10 Commandments case, Justice Scalia wrote a dissent joined in whole by Rehnquist and Thomas and in part by Kennedy. Scalia read from the bench a summary of Part I of his dissent (the part that Kennedy did not join). Be sure to read it. Here are the key points:
1. The history of this country demonstrates that the majority’s proposition that the government cannot favor religion over irreligion is plainly false.
2. “What distinguishes the rule of law from the dictatorship of a shifting Supreme Court majority is the absolutely indispensable requirement that judicial opinions be grounded in consistently applied principle.” The majority flunks that test.
3. “If religion in the public forum had to be entirely nondenominational, there could be no religion in the public forum at all.” “Historical practices . . . demonstrate that there is a distance between the acknkowledgment of a single Creator and the establishment of a religion.” _________________ 8th Army Korea 68-69
Last edited by GM Strong on Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:55 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schadow Vice Admiral
Joined: 30 Sep 2004 Posts: 936 Location: Huntsville, Alabama
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GM Strong wrote: | Be sure to read it. |
The full text of Justice Scalia's dissent can be found at:
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/27jun20051200/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/03-1693.pdf
It's a PDF containing the entirety of the decision. Scalia's dissent begins on page 45 of the 74 pages. It is truly an amazing document in its defense of sanity in the non-existent world of "separation of church and state".
Schadow _________________ Capt, 8th U.S. Army, Korea '53 - '54 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|