Tanya
Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 570
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:58 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
I didn't go to the DNC site, but I did find a comparison from some articles posted at the site you linked:
From the link:
by CPUSA National Board, 10/08/2001 00:00
"The Bush Administration's bombing of Afghanistan Oct. 7 is not a solution to the terrible events of September 11th. Bush's action is driven more by revenge and retaliation, and is aimed at gaining a geo-political advantage. It is not an effective approach to ending terrorism and bringing those responsible to justice."
Comparasion:
June 24, 2004, 9:08 a.m.
Democrats and the Fahrenheit 9/11 Trap
Do they endorse Michael Moore's kookiness?
"Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe says he believes radical filmmaker Michael Moore's assertion that the United States went to war in Afghanistan not to avenge the terrorist attacks of September 11 but instead to assure that the Unocal Corporation could build a natural gas pipeline across Afghanistan for the financial benefit of Vice President Dick Cheney and former Enron chief Kenneth Lay." 
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200406240908.asp
______________________________________________________
by CPUSA National Board, 11/16/2004 00:00
"The Communist Party USA expresses its deep sorrow on the death of Yasser Arafat, the decades-long leader and larger-than-life symbol of the Palestinian people's quest for justice, human rights, self-determination and statehood."
Yeah, it's about the same!
Yasser Arafat endorses Kerry
Thinks Democratic senator 'better for Palestinian cause'
"A prominent Arafat aide who asked that his name be withheld spoke to WorldNetDaily from Arafat's battered Ramallah compound.
"The president [Arafat] is frustrated with Bush's policies," he said. "The president [Arafat] thinks Kerry will be much better for the Palestinian cause and for the establishment of a Palestinian state."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40988
__________________________________________________________
From the link:
"COMMUNIST PARTY USA CALLS BUSH'S WAR ILLEGAL
by National Organizing Department, 03/21/2003 10:01
Warning that the true aim of Bush's military invasion is not Iraqi freedom, but global power, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) issued a statement which condemns the war as a crime against humanity, and calls for a "coalition of the peaceful" to stop the war."
Comparison:
Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-HI: "Only Now Are We Trying To Figure Out What Is Islam. Maybe If There Was A Department Of Peace, They Would Be Able To Say, 'Uh-Oh, We've Got Some Problems With These People,' ... I Truly Believe That If We Had A Department Of Peace, We Would Have Seen (9/11) Coming." (Ethan Wallison, "War A Challenge For Peace Caucus," Roll Call, 10/1/01)
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/6/23/202013.shtml
__________________________________________________________
Special Report
Fundamentalist Outreach
By George Neumayr
Published 11/12/2004 12:08:16 AM
"It is not true that the Democrats didn't show sympathy toward fundamentalists during the campaign. They did -- just to the wrong ones. Islamic fundamentalists received a great deal of understanding and tolerance from the Democrats. John Kerry made a point of showing sensitivity to the Islamic community and for it earned numerous endorsements from Muslim Imams.
Perhaps herein lies a new strategy for the Democrats: What if they treated Christians as respectfully as they treated Yasser Arafat? What if they extended to Christianity the tolerant understanding they extend to Islam? Maybe from time to time the Democrats could refer to Christianity as a religion of peace."
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=7383 |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
