SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

DRUDGE: SECRET PLAN TO QUIT IRAQ

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tanya
Senior Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 570

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 12:31 am    Post subject: DRUDGE: SECRET PLAN TO QUIT IRAQ Reply with quote

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm

"BRITAIN and America are secretly preparing to withdraw most of their troops from Iraq - despite warnings of the grave consequences for the region, the SUNDAY MAIL in UK is reporting."

~snip~
"The leaked document, marked Secret: UK Eyes Only, appears to fly in the face of Mr Blair and President Bush's pledges that Allied forces will not quit until Iraq's own forces are strong enough to take control of security."

more at above link
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 2:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A free clue for any pinheads who would feed Drudge that kind of BS and major raspberries to Drudge for giving it legs.

Drudge is becoming worse than National Enquirer. Confused
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beatrice1000
Resource Specialist


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1179
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Navy_Navy_Navy wrote:
A free clue for any pinheads who would feed Drudge that kind of BS and major raspberries to Drudge for giving it legs.

Drudge is becoming worse than National Enquirer. Confused


I agree -- planting a lot of questionable.. and downright stupid material. this.. "Secret for UK eyes Only" -- what a crock. If the report is for Tony, it's not about to say: "UK eyes only" -- all this leaking info. stuff is getting tiresome. I'd like to see the press required to state who, what, why, where and when for once.... name names. What we get is gossip, gossip and more of the same.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shawa
CNO


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Navy_Navy_Navy said

Quote:
Drudge is becoming worse than National Enquirer.


Thank you for saying that!!
_________________
“I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rparrott21
Master Chief Petty Officer


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 760
Location: Mckinney, Texas

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whatever sales...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BuffaloJack
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1637
Location: Buffalo, New York

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just remember this is the same Drudge that has announced the capture and killing of Al-Zarqawi at least a half dozen or more times.
_________________
Swift Boats - Qui Nhon (12/69-4/70), Cat Lo (4/70-5/70), Vung Tau (5/70-12/71)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kate
Admin


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 1891
Location: Upstate, New York

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ReutersUK reporting it,, more info

Quote:
UK memo says US, UK readying Iraqi withdrawal-report
09 Jul 2005 23:20:28 GMT
Source: Reuters

LONDON, July 10 (Reuters) - A leaked document from Britain's Defence Ministry says the British and U.S. governments are planning to reduce their troop levels in Iraq by more than half by mid-2006, the Mail on Sunday newspaper reported.

The memo, reportedly written by Defence Minister John Reid, said Britain would reduce its troop numbers to 3,000 from 8,500 by the middle of next year.

"We have a commitment to hand over to Iraqi control in Al Muthanna and Maysan provinces (two of the four provinces under British control in southern Iraq) in October 2005 and in the other two, Dhi Qar and Basra, in April 2006," the memo was reported to have said.

The memo said Washington planned to cut its forces to 66,000 from about 140,000 by early 2006.

"Emerging U.S. plans assume 14 out of 18 provinces could be handed over to Iraqi control by early 2006," the memo said.

The United States is training Iraqi forces to take over the country's defence in the face of an insurgency involving allies of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and foreign militants allied to al Qaeda operative Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

But critics say Iraqi troops are not ready to take charge of security in their country.

"There is, however, a debate between the Pentagon/Centcom, who favour a relatively bold reduction in force numbers and the multi-national force in Iraq, whose approach is more cautious," read the memo.

Reid said in a statement in response the article:

"We have made it absolutely plain we will stay in Iraq for as long as is needed. No decision on the future force posture of UK forces has been taken.

"We have always said it is our intention to hand over the lead in fighting terrorists to Iraqi security forces as their capability increases.

"We therefore continually produce papers outlining possible options and contingencies. This is but one of a number of such papers produced over recent months covering various scenarios. This is prudent planning."

The United States and Britain have the two largest contingents of foreign forces in Iraq and the memo described the impact a reduction of U.S. and British forces might have on other allied troops.

"The Japanese will be reluctant to stay if protection is solely provided by the Iraqis. The Australian position may also be uncertain."

The memo said reducing British troop levels in Iraq would save about 1 billion pounds ($1.74 billion) per year.

could this be one of many scenarios on the table...
doesn't the military draw up multiple what-if plans?

and one got leaked.....for someone's ulterior motive
like they leaked the Downing Street memos

_________________
.
one of..... We The People
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"We therefore continually produce papers outlining possible options and contingencies. This is but one of a number of such papers produced over recent months covering various scenarios. This is prudent planning."

As usual - a leftist media's smoking gun that has neither smoke nor gun.

Rolling Eyes
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group