Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:54 pm Post subject: Bruce Kesler: NYT’s Is Full Of Kerry |
 |
|
| Quote: | May 27, 2006
____________________________________________________
NYT’s Is Full Of Kerry
The New York Times is past being the paper of record and is now again recorder for John Kerry’s crap. In another of the New York Times' pattern of weekend raids, this one ironically if not purposely on Memorial Day weekend when honorable service and sacrifice is remembered, it instead cooperates with John Kerry's pathetic attempt to redeem his record of exaggerations and lies, and his dishonor of those who served honorably.
Kate Zernike spent all of two hours interviewing John Kerry, writing a long piece headlined “Kerry Pressing Swift Boat Case Long After Loss” in which Kerry says, “They lied and lied and lied about everything.” Zernike, obviously, failed to research the facts of Kerry’s assertions, but continues the New York Times’ role as willing mouthpiece for Kerry. As the Newsweek reporters who had inside access to Kerry’s 2004 campaign revealed after,The Kerry campaign did work closely with the major dailies, feeding documents to The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Boston Globe to debunk the Swift Boat vets. The articles were mostly (though not entirely) supportive of Kerry, but it was too late. An example of Zernike’s ignorant credulity:The veterans group, led by Mr. O’Neill, a former Swift boat commander who was recruited by the Nixon administration to debate Mr. Kerry on “The Dick Cavett Show” in 1971, began his campaign in early 2004 by criticizing Mr. Kerry’s protests against the Vietnam War. In fact, and well investigated and documented, including by a televised interview with Dick Cavett – a supporter of Kerry -- in 2004, it was I who independently founded and led the Vietnam Veterans for a Just Peace in 1971, it was I who challenged Kerry to debate at our press conference on June 1, 1971, O’Neill was released from active duty in the Navy only a few days before and asked me if he could join us, Cavett says he had no contact from Nixon's administration, and it wasn’t until well after we received national publicity for challenging Kerry’s band of real and fraudulent Vietnam vets that Nixon invited O’Neill to meet.
So, now, John Kerry complains that during the 2004 campaign the Swiftees “spent something like $30 million, and we didn’t. That’s just a terrible imbalance when somebody’s lying about you.” It seems that John Kerry is very willing to spend the millions of dollars left from his 2004 campaign and Theresa’s hundreds of millions of dollars and to fundraise to mount a new campaign to rescue his discredited record of exaggerations and lies.
Make no mistake about it, this is a full-bore campaign by Kerry. Aside from again enlisting the New York Times, he may have directly or indirectly enlisted liberal former newsman Marvin Kalb, who together with his daughter is writing a book on these issues.
I suggest two things:
1. Go to the website of the Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation to familiarize yourself with what may turn into today’s version of the Alger Hiss trials. I don't know whether the "pumpkin papers" will be discovered, or transcripts of Kerry's meetings with North Vietnamese and Viet Cong negotiators in Paris documenting the remarkable subsequent parallelism between his positions and theirs. However, if these former star officers and POW’s can financially sustain their legal challenge to Kerry’s veracity and deep legal pockets, their legal discovery may judicially put many matters to rest.
2. Go to the “30 Questions” that I published September 10, 2004, and see whether Kerry has resolved these matters of fact and evidence. Compare them to the pap served up by Kerry to the New York Times transmission belt.
Sorry Kerry, you’re still full of it. Stick that in your phony hat from Cambodia.
For convenience, the “30 Questions” are below:30 questions
Guest View:
Bruce Kesler
Special to The Augusta Free Press
I am partisan, opposed to John Kerry in 1971 and 2004.
Below, I will also try my hardest to be fair. Judge for yourself.
1. Did Kerry want to go to Vietnam?
He first sought deferment from military service.
2. Did Kerry exaggerate his service on the USS Gridley, offshore Vietnam, for Douglas Brinkley's book Tour Of Duty?
His two-levels up commander and a shipmate say he did.
3. Did Kerry want to be in combat?
The Swift Boats were an offshore patrol unit at the time Kerry volunteered for it.
4. Was Kerry’s first Purple Heart merited?
The senior officer there on the boat at the incident says there was no hostile fire, and Kerry would not have been out on his own at that point in his early tour.
A sailor says the officer, (now Admiral) Schachte (a senior JAG officer), was not there. The wound was probably self-inflicted from an American M-79 grenade.
Nine days later, Kerry wrote, "We hadn't been shot at yet ..."
The wound was a paper matchstick piece of likely M-79 grenade treated with a band-aid.
It may not rise to the qualifications for a Purple Heart, and Kerry's request for it was denied by his superior.
Mysteriously, three months later, after those who knew the facts were gone from Vietnam, the Purple Heart was issued from Saigon.
No documents have been released as to who was on the boat.
5. What is the significance of this first Purple Heart incident?
It, along with two others, permitted Kerry to leave Vietnam eight months early. Without it, Kerry left Vietnam before he should have.
6. Was there political influence or other explanation for the issuance of the first Purple Heart?
Kerry refuses to release his full military records or his journal. No witnesses have emerged as to how the first Purple Heart came to be issued.
7. Has the merit of Kerry’s second Purple Heart been challenged?
No. It has not been seriously challenged.
8. Did Kerry’s account of his second Purple Heart vary from facts?
Yes. The Kerry campaign Web site's display of partial documents contained that Kerry was the commander of the boat that day. When the actual skipper challenged that, the Kerry campaign removed a 20-page batch of documents from its Web site.
9. Did Kerry merit the Silver Star?
A Kerry supporter who commanded another boat involved in the incident writes that it was the members of other boats that first and primarily mopped up from the encounter with Viet Cong. Kerry went ashore and killed a fleeing, wounded, armed VC. Kerry's actions do not rise to the standards of the Silver Star. The other sailors and officers on the three boats involved did not receive the Silver Star.
10. Did Kerry merit the Bronze Star?
Difficult to say. The standards of the Bronze Star are lower than for the Silver. The timeline of differing witnesses of whether there was enemy fire, and most particularly whether Kerry was under fire when he picked up Rassmann, have not been clearly delineated. Similarly, the facts of how Kerry came to go a half-mile to a mile downriver from the mine explosion under another boat, later returning to the other boats that did not leave the scene, are unclear.
11. Did Kerry merit the third Purple Heart for the Bronze Star incident?
It is proven that "shrapnel" to Kerry's buttocks came from his earlier being hit when blowing up some VC rice. The "contusion" to Kerry's arm during the Bronze Star episode may not rise to Purple Heart standards. There is confusion as to whether and when in the timeline Kerry fell and hit his arm against his own boat. The Purple Heart standard says, "A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent ..."
12. Did Kerry display physical courage in Vietnam?
Indisputably. In all cases, maybe.
13. Does the Kerry Website displayed documents show a "V" on the Silver Star, which is not practice?
Yes.
14. Do the three citations for the Silver Star contain varying accounts of its merits?
Yes.
15. Why do the three Silver Star citations contain differing accounts?
Not answered yet. The Secretary of the Navy, John Lehman, says he did not do the third citation - the signature may be an autopen - nor does he know why it was issued in the '80s.
16. Was Kerry in Cambodia on Christmas 1968?
All evidence is to the contrary to Kerry's up to 50 times repeating this story.
17. Was Kerry in Cambodia at another time?
All evidence is to the contrary. No evidence has been presented to say that he was. Brinkley now says Kerry's statement about being in Cambodia at Christmas "is obviously wrong."
18. Did Kerry write up some of the reports at dispute in the medals?
Unclear without further documents being released. At his April 22, 1971, testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry did say: "... I can recall often sending in the spot reports which we made after each mission ..." Not conclusive. Others recall Kerry often sending in reports, including when they did not. The "Market Time Spot Report 13/1/TE 194.5.4.4/1" that was the primary document relied upon for the Bronze Star/third Purple Heart was from Kerry's designator.
19. Did Kerry accuse the U.S. and Vietnam veterans of committing pervasive, sanctioned atrocities?
Yes. Read the words and accounts of the time in 1971.
20. Did Kerry attend a meeting of Vietnam Veterans Against the War in November 1971 at which it was proposed to assassinate several pro-Vietnam war U.S. senators?
Yes.
21. Did Kerry deny he was there?
Yes. Until a New York Sun reporter showed that FBI records proved otherwise.
22. Did Kerry report the danger to any authorities?
No.
23. Did Kerry break the Logan Act by going to the Paris Peace Talks to talk with the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong delegations, or other laws related to his deserve obligations in his protest activities?
That's for judicial decision. Others have not been convicted for similar deeds.
24. Did Kerry mislead that he tossed his medals during a protest demonstration?
Yes. Confronted, Kerry now says they were ribbons.
25. Were Kerry's words used against POWs in North Vietnam?
Words like his were. Also, at least four of the POWs say publicly that John Kerry's words were used to try to break them down, so probably more were so subjected.
26. Did Kerry push normalization of U.S. relations with Vietnam, and for a relative's profit?
Kerry and others pushed for normalization. His cousin soon after obtained a large contract with Vietnam, but no direct link has yet been proven.
27. Has Kerry ever apologized or recanted for any of his above actions and words?
No.
28. Has John Kerry released his full military records and journals?
He refuses. Kerry has claimed he can't release his journals due to contractual obligations to Douglas Brinkley, author of Tour Of Duty. Brinkley says, however, according to The Washington Post: "... the papers are the property of the senator and in his full control." Brinkley says, "I don't mind if John Kerry shows anybody anything."
29. Has the mainstream press requested the release of Kerry's full military records?
Only one says so, the Washington Post, which only received about six of 100 pages of records.
30. Has there been more smoke than wood in much of this public debate?
Yes, in my opinion. That is why I wrote the above.
Democracy Project |
admin note: While this article had been noted earlier in the forum, it warrants replication in full in it's own topic. Thanks to Powsmias for taking the initiative. Topic amended/me#1 |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
