SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Judge: Wiretap Program Unconstitutional
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
shawa
CNO


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 2004

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:33 pm    Post subject: Judge: Wiretap Program Unconstitutional Reply with quote

A noted ACTIVIST judge --Jimmuh Carter appointee!!
Quote:
Judge: Wiretap Program Unconstitutional
- By SARAH KARUSH, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, August 17, 2006

(08-17) 09:23 PDT DETROIT (AP) --

A federal judge ruled Thursday that the government's warrantless wiretapping program is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt to it.

U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program, which she says violates the rights to free speech and privacy as well as the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution.

"Plaintiffs have prevailed, and the public interest is clear, in this matter. It is the upholding of our Constitution," Taylor wrote in her 43-page opinion.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, which involves secretly listening to conversations between people in the U.S. and people in other countries.

The government argued that the program is well within the president's authority, but said proving that would require revealing state secrets.

The ACLU said the state-secrets argument was irrelevant because the Bush administration already had publicly revealed enough information about the program for Taylor to rule.

SOURCE

_________________
“I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BuffaloJack
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 1637
Location: Buffalo, New York

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is hooey.
Another liberal activist judge who would flush our nation down the commode.
Without the right to listen in on the bad guys conversations, the recent round-up of terrorists that our wonderful allies, the Brits, conducted, would never have happened and there would be another 3 or 4 thousand Americans and others dead.
And the filers of the suit. The ACLU.
The ACLU is one of the worst underminers of American Freedom to ever exist. Every action they perpetrate erodes our safety and security and helps the terrorists. IMHO they out to be classified as a terrorism supporting organization. The ACLU is as much of a threat to our Freedoms and way of life as the terrorists.
_________________
Swift Boats - Qui Nhon (12/69-4/70), Cat Lo (4/70-5/70), Vung Tau (5/70-12/71)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schadow
Vice Admiral


Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Huntsville, Alabama

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some judge HAS to be found, pronto, to issue a temporary stay on this until the Supremes can act and, hopefully, overturn.

The ACLU obviously went judge-shopping and found this Carter appointee to do their bidding.

We are being eaten alive by traitors.

Schadow
_________________
Capt, 8th U.S. Army, Korea '53 - '54
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JN173
Commander


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 341
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bet this makes the frontpage/lead story of the MSM Evil or Very Mad Rolling Eyes
_________________
A Grunt
2/503 173rd Airborne Brigade
RVN '65-'66
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carpro
Admin


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 1176
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have no doubt this decision will eventually be overturned.
_________________
"If he believes his 1971 indictment of his country and his fellow veterans was true, then he couldn't possibly be proud of his Vietnam service."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dusty
Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 1264
Location: East Texas

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This judge should be made to continously fly in and out of the United States on U.S. aircarriers until either the threat of these planes being hijacked or blown up is past or until the one she is one suffers that exact fate.

Dusty
_________________
Left and Wrong are the opposite of Right!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schadow
Vice Admiral


Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Huntsville, Alabama

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are some snips from a Detroit Free Press article dated 7 August 2006:

Quote:
Judge could alter war on terror

<snip>

Anna Diggs Taylor never planned to become a federal judge. But opportunity knocked.

She never intended to become the first black woman to serve as chief judge of the U.S. District Court in eastern Michigan.

<snip>

In 1979, three years after she campaigned for Jimmy Carter's presidential bid, Carter rewarded Taylor with a lifetime appointment to U.S. District Court in Detroit.

<snip>

In 1984, Taylor banned nativity scenes on municipal property in Birmingham and Dearborn in ACLU lawsuits.

<snip>

In 1998, a year after Taylor became chief judge, Judge Bernard Friedman blasted her for her role in an effort to have a suit challenging the University of Michigan's use of race in its law school's admission policies assigned to another judge who was handling a similar case. Taylor's husband is a U-M regent.

<snip>

But even if Taylor harpoons the spying program, experts said, the decision likely would be overturned by the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.

"Given the composition of the 6th Circuit and its previous rulings in related areas, it seems more likely to favor national security over civil liberties if that issue is squarely presented," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond in Virginia. "And that's what this case is all about."


So, maybe there's hope.

Source

Schadow
_________________
Capt, 8th U.S. Army, Korea '53 - '54
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LewWaters
Admin


Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rush was talking about this earlier this morning. From what I heard, the Judge went and took the case from another Judge. He also mentioned all the ties to Jimmuh Cahtah and this Judge.

I'm waiting to see if he puts the transcript up on the EIB Network site.

When we get hit again, and undoubtedly, we will, watch as the leftist start whining about it all and I will be at the head of the line to remind them it was they who erected all the blocks to Bush effectively cutting off terrorist activity within the US.

Edit: Mark Levin has commented on this here at: National Review
_________________
Clark County Conservative
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shawa
CNO


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 2004

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Update from Mark Levin.
Quote:
UPDATE: This from the Justice Department: "The parties have also agreed to a stay of the injunction until the District Court can hear the Department's motion for a stay pending appeal."

_________________
“I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shawa
CNO


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 2004

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
'The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, which involves secretly listening to conversations between people in the U.S. and people in other countries.'

This really frosts me!!

I DO NOT CARE that the program makes it difficult for them to do their jobs!

I DO CARE that the program keeps the terrorists from successfully doing theirs!!
_________________
“I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. ‘Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” (Thomas Paine, 1776)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dusty
Admiral


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 1264
Location: East Texas

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shawa wrote:
Quote:
'The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, which involves secretly listening to conversations between people in the U.S. and people in other countries.'

This really frosts me!!

I DO NOT CARE that the program makes it difficult for them to do their jobs!

I DO CARE that the program keeps the terrorists from successfully doing theirs!!


Right on shawa.
Just who are these journalists, scholars and lawyers talking to that they would be targets of the program?
The program targets known Al Quada operatives. If they are talking to Al Quada, I damn sure want the govt. to know about it. Tough s..t if they can't plan and conspire like they would like to without being listened to.
I say bring the ACLU into court and demand the list of these journalists, scholars and lawyers on whose behalf they have filed this suit and let's investigate them and find out just who it is they are talking to that they are worried about being listened in on.

Dusty
_________________
Left and Wrong are the opposite of Right!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schadow
Vice Admiral


Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Huntsville, Alabama

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dusty wrote:
Right on shawa.

Just who are these journalists, scholars and lawyers talking to that they would be targets of the program?
The program targets known Al Quada operatives. If they are talking to Al Quada, I damn sure want the govt. to know about it. Tough s..t if they can't plan and conspire like they would like to without being listened to.
I say bring the ACLU into court and demand the list of these journalists, scholars and lawyers on whose behalf they have filed this suit and let's investigate them and find out just who it is they are talking to that they are worried about being listened in on.

Dusty


Brit had a constitutional lawyer from Pepperdine on the show today. A significant point he made was that there is much precedence in similar cases that require the plaintiffs to have specific and quantifiable measures of the damages done to them in order to succeed in their case. As far as I can tell, these lefty journalists, scholars and lawyers had only the feeling of the possibility of a threat. Nothing actual or quantifiable.

The betting is that the 6th Circuit will overturn on that basis in addition to others, mainly relating to the powers of the President in wartime.

Schadow
_________________
Capt, 8th U.S. Army, Korea '53 - '54
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fortdixlover
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 1476

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

shawa wrote:
Quote:
'The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, which involves secretly listening to conversations between people in the U.S. and people in other countries.'

This really frosts me!!

I DO NOT CARE that the program makes it difficult for them to do their jobs!

I DO CARE that the program keeps the terrorists from successfully doing theirs!!


The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of a self-anointed 'elite' group of leftist journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs of destroying Western culture in line with the tenets of social Marxism.

There. Fixed that.

Don't anyone here forget it.
_________________
"Millions For Defense, Not One Cent For Tribute" - Thomas Jefferson on paying ransom to Muslim corsairs (pirates).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PhantomSgt
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 972
Location: GUAM, USA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This issue need to be fast tracked to the USSC for an abosolute and final resolution.

I can accept their decision, but not one from a card carrying member of the ACLU in between.
_________________
Retired AF E-8

Independent that leans right of center.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jwb7605
Rear Admiral


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 690
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

from Mark Levihn's article:
Quote:

UPDATE II: Just to be clear, Taylor ruled that the president/NSA violated the FISA, Title III, the First and Fourth Amendments, and the Separation of Powers doctrine.


The Judge's ruling might just hold. The only thing she's violated is common sense[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group