|
SwiftVets.com Service to Country
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Me#1You#10 Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 6503
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 5:47 am Post subject: Thomas Lipscomb: "Purple Hearts for PTSD?" |
|
|
Here's an article that I'm sorry had to be written...and I commend Thomas Lipscomb for doing so...
Quote: | May 26, 2008
Purple Hearts for PTSD?
By Thomas Lipscomb
Since the 1960s the combination of the antiwar and non-serving sectors of academia, the media, the leaders of various peace causes, the "allergic-to-combat" upper income sector of society and the "shrinkocracy" have made various cases with various levels of proof that try to establish that not only was the old Mothers for Peace poster correct that "war not healthy for children and other living things," but that it causes far more casualties than are normally counted.
Veterans have always found war downright hazardous to their health. But now their own lobbying groups such as the Veterans of Foreign Wars, American Legion, and Vietnam Veterans of America, and employees of the Veterans' Administration itself have decided to facilitate a blizzard of dubious veterans' benefit claims worse than the wildest dreams of any welfare queen.
Now the anti-military groups and some veterans' lobbyists appear to be combining forces in asking that the honored Purple Heart for those physically wounded in combat be awarded for mental conditions based upon some highly dubious criteria. And this proposal is actually receiving serious consideration by the Bush Department of Defense.
Claims of injuries from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) are being used to grossly inflate the casualty rate and establish a whole new class of dubious "victims" out of veterans who served their country and are now being induced to serve themselves by both those who hate the American military while, of course, ritually praising their "service," and veteran lobbyist groups who claim to speak "for veterans" while increasing their ability to sell veterans on the benefits they get by paying for membership.
In doing so, they have helped veterans and in some cases people who simply claimed to be veterans make hundreds of thousands of PTSD injury claims in what military records fraud expert B.G. Burkett calls "by far the largest collection of military disability fraud cases in the history of the United States, all alleging PTSD."
Seventy percent of the disability claims presented to the Veterans Administration come through what is called "a membership representative," who often works for one of the veterans' lobbyist organizations and helps applicants with the difficult paperwork. One of the recent candidates for president of the Vietnam Veterans of America had to disqualify himself when it was revealed that he had admitted drawing up phony claims for disabilities by VVA members to the Veterans' Administration.
Since a 100% disability payment for PTSD can be worth more than $30,000 a year for life, it is not surprising that a high percentage of veterans working for the VA also receive payments for PTSD themselves. It also makes the grantee eligible for a 50% disability payment under Social Security. Together they total over $40,000 a year, tax free and inflation-indexed.
Burkett, a veteran himself, has been hired as an expert to the Marine Corps and the FBI, and testified on cases of phony assertions of rank, military service and medals awarded in numerous legal cases. His book "Stolen Valor" led to the recent passage of the Stolen Valor Act of 2006. The Act established Federal penalties for attempts to pass off fraudulent claims for medals or military service. Newspapers have carried stories for years about Burkett's work in helping unmask pretenders to military rank and honors who had been showing up on 4th of July reviewing stands and public ceremonies for years in full dress uniforms, with ranks and decorations they had invented rather than earned.
In an attempt to try to get a handle on the flood of PTSD disability claims overwhelming the Veteran's Administration, its Inspector General department asked Burkett to take a look at a pilot study the VA had made of 2,100 random PTSD cases that had been extracted out of the 287,000 cases they were considering at the time.
Of that sample group, for example, more than 28% had no medical trauma event of any kind in their records. And the rate of successful PTSD claims processed through the VA system was far higher in some parts of the country. Some areas approved 60% of claims with no trauma record while only 10% were granted in others. The VA seemed on the edge of uncovering the most massive fraud in its history and one in which it bore at least part of the blame. As the second largest agency in the Federal government with almost 300,000 employees it was at least possible for it to do a solid evaluation.
But as soon as word of the VA's intention of a broad review of hundreds of thousands of PTSD claims costing potentially billions of dollars got out, those critical of the review lobbied their allies in Congress to halt the investigation. Not surprisingly, no review has taken place. In the meantime the paperwork on PTSD disability claims has gotten so huge at the VA and the expense of reviewing each claim is so high, that the VA is considering routinely granting disability payments before finally approving claims.
There has been enough medal inflation in the American military over the past half century. From the medals "package" that started being handed out like Red Cross donuts in the Vietnam War to the rows of ticket-punching "I was there" ribbons that clutter the chest of a 19-year-old who had some involvement in the current conflict in the Middle East, it is hard enough to separate those that mean something from the rest.
But the idea of seriously considering awarding the Purple Heart for an as yet difficult to establish PTSD condition that is the focus of an immense fraud being concealed from the public, whose taxes have to pay for it, by both the Executive and Legislative branches of the Federal Government is a cynical obscenity.
Let's do the best we can to support the Military Order of the Purple Heart, made up of those to whom it has actually been awarded. They are trying to keep the one medal established by George Washington from degradation. It is one of the few awards that has maintained its value during all the medal inflation of the past 70 years since it was re-established by Douglas MacArthur.
It should not be allowed to fall victim to the military's self-interested "friends" and long-standing enemies. We don't need another worthless example of the inability of our society to tell a proud citation for what novelist Stephen Crane called "the red badge of courage" from the bloodless transmittal sheet for yet another questionable disability claim.
Thomas Lipscomb is an independent investigative reporter whose work was entered for the Pulitzer for investigative reporting in 2005. He is a senior fellow at the Annenberg Center for the Digital Future (USC) tom@digitalfuture.org
Real Clear Politics |
Last edited by Me#1You#10 on Wed May 28, 2008 1:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BuffaloJack Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 1637 Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Purple Heart Medal should only be received by those wounded in battle and who require a period of convalescence as a result of their injuries. And I'm not talking about something that a swab of iodine and a bandaid will cover up. Giving this award for anything less is to diminish its statute. Using PTSD as a criteria for a Purple Heart is nothing less than liberals, socialists and Marxists "Meddling with the Rights of Real Men." _________________ Swift Boats - Qui Nhon (12/69-4/70), Cat Lo (4/70-5/70), Vung Tau (5/70-12/71) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Me#1You#10 Site Admin
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 6503
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As I think Lipscomb suggests, the award of a Purple Heart for PTSD diagnosed disorders masks a back-door attempt to solidify and institutionalize what has become a PTSD-related cottage industry in this country and, perhaps as an unintended consequence, fosters the insidious and often ideologically-inspired depiction of the American Veteran as psychologically damaged goods (see anything Hollywood).
While I believe that PTSD can be a valid diagnosis and veterans suffering from it must be assisted, like anything else the government administers or touches, the opportunity for abuse and outright fraud is enormous...and, according to some involved in the issue...growing rapidly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
baldeagle PO2
Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Posts: 362 Location: Grand Saline, Texas
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
#1, back when I was a tadpole, I remember my uncle who was a Marine in WWII, who had island-hopped across the Pacific, came home with what they called then, "Battle Fatigue". I came out the front door at gramma's house while the men were all settin' on the front porch gossipin' one day, and let the spring loaded screen door slam with a loud bang. Uncle Ben leaped out of his rocker, lept off the porch and dug in next to the hedges, before he realized where he was and came, kinda sheepishly, back up on the porch.
All those veterans of that era came home, and coped, and got on with their lives. Nowadays, we live in a society which promotes the "victim mentality", giving rise to all sorts of folks who come to believe they are entitled to be rewarded for anything bad which may have occured to them.
Bad things happen to everybody. Travellers on the interstates come upon terrible wrecks and have to help the folks involved, both my brothers were state troopers and had to work many wreck scenes during their careers, many involving young children.
I, myself, as an air traffic controller was involved in several fatal accidents over the years, none of which I was ever judged to be in any way at fault, but you always wonder..........could I have done anything differently.
And what about EMS people and all the traumatic cases they have to deal with in a career? We all have had to deal with bad things in our lives. You learn to get on and put it behind you.
We had a similar scam that occured in the ATC ranks back in the mid to late 70's, during the PATCO era. Some controllers called it the "5 year retirement plan. It involved what was then called "Controller burnout" and the fact that that controllers with 5 years service qualified for 100% disability when disabled. Sure enough, some figured out how to scam the system. In addition to the government pension, you could purchase disability insurance from commercial companies for up to 80% of salary and collect after a certain amount of time. You could also purchase disability insurance on the financing of most major purchases, like homes, autos, etc.
There were many who had sudden "nervous breakdowns" at work not too long after they got their 5 years in before the "powers-that-be" decided to investigate.
To this day it is still virtually impossible for an air traffic control specialist to buy disability insurance from a commercial company.
Since it is very difficult for any medical professional to determine whether a nervous breakdown is, or is not, real, they got away with it for a while.
Unfortunately the current crop of scammers using the PTSD are hard to determine the truth. _________________ "In a word, I want an American character, that the powers of Europe may be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others; this, in my judgment, is the only way to be respected abroad and happy at home." --George Washington |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LewWaters Admin
Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 4042 Location: Washington State
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | While I believe that PTSD can be a valid diagnosis and veterans suffering from it must be assisted, like anything else the government administers or touches, the opportunity for abuse and outright fraud is enormous...and, according to some involved in the issue...growing rapidly. |
In Stolen Valor, Burkett documented several cases of PTSD fraud. As I recall, the effort to screen those claiming PTSD was stopped, due to the efforts of Democrat Patty Murray.
I do know of some Vets who tried for disability and couldn't obtain it, until they cried PTSD.
I see this move as nothing more than another step in the victimization of Veterans by pandering. _________________ Clark County Conservative |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|