SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Will Congress Wreck Health Care?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jalexson
PO3


Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 272
Location: Hutchinson, Kansas

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:36 pm    Post subject: Will Congress Wreck Health Care? Reply with quote

The most important rule in health care is "first do no harm". Unfortunately Congressional Democrats seem totally oblivious to this rule.

Many Democrats are so egotistical that they think anything they do will be an improvement. They seem incapable of understanding that changes can make a situation worse instead of better just like giving a patient the wrong medical treatment can worsen the patient's condition. The wrong medical treatment can kill. Making the wrong changes in the health care system can reduce access to health care and reduce the quality of health care.

In one of my favorite episodes of M*A*S*H* Captain Hawkeye Pierce is appointed the unit's chief surgeon. Major Frank Burns complains to a general when Hawkeye decides not to immediately operate on a badly wounded soldier who comes in. When the general arrives Hawkeye has been playing cards while the man was receiving a blood transfusion, etc. to stabilize his condition. Hawkeye tells the general he can now safely operate because the patient has been stabilized. Operating too soon would have jeopardized the patient's chances of survival.

Congressional Democrats continue to push a health care plan substantially similar to the one adopted by Massachusetts which is a failure according to the Boston Globe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform
Boston Globe

The program has failed to provide the universal care it was supposed to guarantee. Coverage is not affordable. The cost of the subsidized program has gone from $630 million in 2007 to $1.3 in 2009. High deductibles mean people who buy compulsory coverage may not be able to afford to use it.

Low income families aren't the only ones who have trouble affording health insurance. Many with incomes well above the poverty level like Ron Norton of Worcester, Mass., make too much to qualify for government assistance but not enough to afford insurance.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125304790936413347.html

The key to successful medical treatment is an accurate diagnosis. The problem with American health care is the high cost of health care rather than lack of insurance. High costs make it difficult for persons to afford insurance.

Doctors take x-rays or run tests as appropriate before choosing treatment for any major medical problem. Congress needs to do the same with health care. Congress needs to determine the specific causes of high costs to see if they are unnecessary.

For example, are doctors, hospital administrators, insurance executives, etc. receiving higher incomes than patients can afford to provide them? Are hospitals or other medical facilities making excessive profits by overcharging insurance companies? Are so called non-profit hospitals or clinics actually functioning as if they were profit making organizations? Are the uninsured including illegal aliens really responsible for high costs or are they being used as scapegoats by the health care industry to cover up the real cause? Are courts forcing unnecessary costs on the industry?

This is breast cancer awareness month so perhaps a breast cancer analogy is appropriate. Thirty years ago the treatment for all forms of breast cancer was usually a complete mastectomy. Today some, but not all, forms of breast cancer can be successfully treated with a simple lumpectomy that removes only the small tumors, provided the cancer is detected early enough.
http://www.breastcancer.org/treatment/surgery/mast_vs_lump.jsp

Thirty years ago toxic chemicals were used to treat breast and other cancers. Today a growing number of cancers can be treated with milder chemicals that may attack only the cancer cells without damaging other healthy cells. In some cases radiation can be targeted to cancer cells without harming healthy cells.

The American health care "problem" doesn't require radical surgery or toxic chemicals. Improving American health care only requires a lumpectomy and mild chemicals.

note: Long URL hyperlinked/me#1
_________________
"That awful power, the public opinion of a nation, is created in America by a horde of ignorant, self-complacent simpletons who failed at ditching and shoe making and fetched up in journalism on their way to the poor house."
-- Mark Twain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group