SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Discrepancies in the 3/13/69 incident

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Resources & Research
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
baldeagl
PO3


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 260
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:40 pm    Post subject: Discrepancies in the 3/13/69 incident Reply with quote

I can't believe it! I'm reading the March Spot Report for 3/13/69, and I see a handwritten note in the upper right hand corner - "5 PCFs, Song Bay Hap, Rach Dong Kung (could Kerry be confusing this for the 3/18 incident), HF encountered plus MINE (MINE is underlined - what is "HF"?), 7 USN WIA, 1 MSF KIA (6T). The (Vietnamese) MSF was killed by a booby trap earlier in the day.

The SpotReport claims PCF-3 was hit by a mine but makes no mention of a second mine detonating. It also reports "heavy A/W and S/A fire from both banks" and "two other explosions were observed", but there's no mention of a second boat being hit.

The US WIA are listed as LTJG Richard Pees, ENS Kenneth Tryner, GMG3 Earl Hollister, RD3 Leslie Vorphal, GMG3 Wolfe, EN3 Arp and LTJG Kerry. No one had any bullet wounds. GMG3 Wolfe had shrapnel wounds. Except for Kerry, all the rest had injuries consistent with a mine explosion.

GMG3 Hollister was the forward (M-60) gunner on PCF-3 and was wounded by shrapnel in the groin, which is consistent with his position (standing in the bow of the boat with his torso below decks).

RD3 Vorphal was the coxwain aboard PCF-3 and suffered a back injury and concussion, injuries consistent with a mine explosion.

ENS Tryner was serving as OinC (in training) aboard PCF-3 and suffered a back injury and concussion, injuries consistent with a mine explosion.

LTJG Pees was OinC of PCF-3 and suffered a concussion and back injury, injuries consistent with a mine explosion.

There's no injury reports for Wolfe and Arp. I suspect Wolfe would have been the stern gunner and Arp may have been close to him. Since they would have been in the stern and not in an inclosed space (like the coxwain and OinC who would have been in the pilot house), they probably suffered less serious injuries. In fact they may have been the two that were thrown overboard by the explosion.

We all know about Kerry's wounds.

Sandusky has stated publicly that "men" (plural) "died" on that boat.
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2004_0710a.html

“Del Sandusky, 58, of Elgin, Ill., and Clearwater, Fla., served under Kerry on a patrol boat in 1969. When another boat hit a mine, Kerry ordered the dead and injured brought on board and the sinking boat towed, six or seven miles, to the Gulf of Tonkin. Because Americans had died on the boat, Kerry, out of loyalty, wouldn't leave it behind for the enemy."

Sandusky describes the reason Kerry went back and got the boat and towed it was "out of loyalty" that men died on that boat. Makes him sound sooooo respectful of the casualties of war. God that's smarmy. Gives me the creeps.

I think I'm going to vomit.
_________________
antimedia
USN OST-6 68-74
http://antimedia.blogspot.com/


Last edited by baldeagl on Tue Aug 17, 2004 9:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cipher
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 902

PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2004 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
HF encountered plus MINE (MINE is underlined - what is "HF"?)


I'm going to assume that is not a rhetorical question. In that context, it could only mean "Hostile Fire".

In my military line of work, it would be "High Frequency", but hey, someone has to fix the commo, right?
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baldeagl
PO3


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 260
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wasn't sure if it was Hostile Fire or Heavy Fire. I just wanted to be accurate.
_________________
antimedia
USN OST-6 68-74
http://antimedia.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cipher
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 902

PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my opinion, it's simply Hostile Fire. The A/W and S/A for Automatic Weapons and Semi Automatic are more descriptive regarding the type of fire.

That's a problem when using abbreviations, they can be subject to misinterpretation. And when used in a non-standard way, they can be downright confusing.

According to the Naval Training Systems Command (NTSC) standard list of abbreviations, "HF" is not defined when used in a combat context. Neither is A/W or S/A, for that matter.

There are a bunch of military documents available online that define DoD, general and specific military and several lists of US Navy abbreviations. Swabbies are especially enamored with acronyms and abbreviations: CSUB, CSUBCINC, CINCSUBCINC...

However, that is assuming the one doing the writing of the notation is also familiar with them.
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cipher
Vice Admiral


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 902

PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 4:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

baldeagl, I was over looking at your blogsphere. Pretty nice place you've got there.

Got a question for you. You know the CIA hat story by heart by now, the question I have is on this part of that story:

Quote:
''Who told you?' he demanded as he reached inside. "My friends don't know about this."

The hat was a little mildewy. The green camouflage was fading, the seams fraying.

'My good luck hat,' Kerry said, happy to see it. 'Given to me by a CIA guy as we went in for a special mission in Cambodia.'


Here's the question: The CIA guy is getting inserted for a black op. He's only got what he brung, and it's very likely calculated to the ounce, since he's going in spooky, high speed, low drag, and all that snake-eater stuff. What would POSSESS a jungle ops clandestine operative to give his HAT to a boat driver? Going into the weeds bareheaded is just not very bright, in my opinion.

Is it possible he might have bought the hat in town and put it in his briefcase, forgot it was there and how he got it? That makes much more sense than a snoop-and-poop giving up his headgear and going into the bush with nothing but hair on his head.
_________________
USMC 69-72, 7th Comm, 3rd MarDiv, FMFPAC
US Army 75-79, 97th Sig, SHAPE, NATO
Arkansas National Guard 79
Defense contractor for US Navy, SSPO, SP-20, SP-24, OP-12 84-92
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baldeagl
PO3


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 260
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I think I've fisked the covert ops with Swift boats pretty good - who wants to do covert ops in a boat that sounds like "a damn Greyhound bus" (according to Joe Muharsky who served with Kerry and support his bid for the Presidency) that you "could hear for miles away" (according to Jim Rassmann, the Green Beret that Kerry "rescued")?

But the Kerry camp could simply say that the CIA guy gave it to him when they extracted him rather than inserted him. Faulty memory and all that sort of thing.

Some of the other lies are going to be much harder to explain.
_________________
antimedia
USN OST-6 68-74
http://antimedia.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Resources & Research All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group