SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Fact or fiction, Both guilty

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tigerflyboy
Former Member


Joined: 16 May 2004
Posts: 50
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:21 pm    Post subject: Fact or fiction, Both guilty Reply with quote

Here are some excerpts from an article that gives some truths, to claims by both Bush and Kerry. BTW, Bandits you'll notice that it does mention that there are claims by the Bush camps about Kerry's service...

On Tuesday, President Bush's campaign began airing an ad saying Kerry would scrap wiretaps that are needed to hunt terrorists.

The same day, the Bush campaign charged in a memo sent to reporters and through surrogates that Kerry wants to raise the gasoline tax by 50 cents.

On Wednesday and Thursday, as Kerry campaigned in Seattle, he was greeted by another Bush ad alleging that Kerry now opposes education changes that he supported in 2001.

The charges were all tough, serious -- and wrong, or at least highly misleading. Kerry did not question the war on terrorism, has proposed repealing tax cuts only for those earning more than $200,000, supports wiretaps, has not endorsed a 50-cent gasoline tax increase in 10 years, and continues to support the education changes, albeit with modifications.

Three-quarters of the ads aired by Bush's campaign have been attacks on Kerry. Bush so far has aired 49,050 negative ads in the top 100 markets, or 75 percent of his advertising. Kerry has run 13,336 negative ads -- or 27 percent of his total. The figures were compiled by The Washington Post using data from the Campaign Media Analysis Group of the top 100 U.S. markets. Both campaigns said the figures are accurate.

Kerry, too, has made his own misleading statements and exaggerations. For example, he said in a speech last week about Iraq: "They have gone it alone when they should have assembled a whole team." That is not true. There are about 25,000 allied troops from several nations, particularly Britain, in Iraq. Likewise, Kerry said several times last week that Bush has spent $80 million on negative and misleading ads -- a significant overstatement. Kerry also suggested several times last week that Bush opposed increasing spending on several homeland defense programs; in fact, Bush has proposed big increases in homeland security but opposed some Democratic attempts to increase spending even more in some areas.

From the president and Cheney down to media aides stationed in every battleground state and volunteers who dress up like Flipper the flip-flopping dolphin at rallies, the Bush campaign relentlessly portrays Kerry as elitist, untrustworthy, liberal and a flip-flopper on major issues. This campaign is persistent and methodical, and it often revs up on Monday mornings with the strategically timed release of ads or damaging attacks on Kerry, including questioning medical and service records in Vietnam and his involvement in the peace movement afterward. Often, they knock Kerry off message and force him to deflect personal questions.

In early March, Bush charged that Kerry had proposed a $1.5 billion cut in the intelligence budget that would "gut the intelligence services."

Kerry did propose such a cut in 1995, but it amounted to about 1 percent of the overall intelligence budget and was smaller than the $3.8 billion cut the Republican-led Congress approved for the same program Kerry was targeting.

The campaign ads, which are most scrutinized, have produced a torrent of misstatements. On March 11, the Bush team released a spot saying that in his first 100 days in office Kerry would "raise taxes by at least $900 billion." Kerry has said no such thing; the number was developed by the Bush campaign's calculations of Kerry's proposals.

On March 30, the Bush team released an ad noting that Kerry "supported a 50-cent-a-gallon gas tax" and saying, "If Kerry's tax increase were law, the average family would pay $657 more a year."

But Kerry opposes an increase in the gasoline tax. The ad is based on a 10-year-old newspaper quotation of Kerry but implies that the proposal is current.

Other Bush claims, though misleading, are rooted in facts. For example, Cheney's claim in almost every speech that Kerry "has voted some 350 times for higher taxes" includes any vote in which Kerry voted to leave taxes unchanged or supported a smaller tax cut than some favored.

The strategy was in full operation last week, beginning Monday in Arkansas. "Senator Kerry," Cheney said, "has questioned whether the war on terror is really a war at all. He said, quote, 'I don't want to use that terminology.' In his view, opposing terrorism is far less of a military operation and more of a law enforcement operation."

But Kerry did not say what Cheney attributes to him. The quote Cheney used came from a March interview with the New York Times, in which Kerry used the phrase "war on terror." When he said "I don't want to use that terminology," he was discussing the "economic transformation" of the Middle East -- not the war on terrorism.

It is true Kerry has voted numerous times to eliminate weapons systems and opposed the 1991 Iraq war. But Cheney voted against many of those same weapons systems, and Kerry has voted for several defense increases, especially in recent years.

On Wednesday, a Bush memo charged that Kerry "led the fight against creating the Department of Homeland Security." While Kerry did vote against the Bush version multiple times, it is not true that he led the fight, but rather was one of several Democrats who held out for different labor agreements as part of its creation. Left unsaid is that, in the final vote, Kerry supported the department -- which Bush initially opposed.

Seems that both camps are guilty of misleading the country, (of course that standard procedure for politicians), but Bush has been extremely negative. Atempting to dirve the average voter waway from Kerry by linking Kerry to plans, even if they are 10-20 years old. never mind that he has voted to support the very things he's claimed to be against.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
War Dog
Captain


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 517
Location: Below Birmingham Alabama

PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tigerflyboy, there are many here that would like to know your military credentials, such as what service, what years in service, job in service, duty stations while in service.

I'm asking this not to condone or condemn you or anything you have posted, but because there are those here that would like to know, so that we can better understand where you are coming from.

Thanks,

Woof!
_________________
"When people are in trouble, they call the cops.

When cops need help, they call the K-9 unit."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
War Dog
Captain


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 517
Location: Below Birmingham Alabama

PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks tigerflyboy for your prompt reply in the private message.

I'm satisifed with your response.

Woof!
_________________
"When people are in trouble, they call the cops.

When cops need help, they call the K-9 unit."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stop kerry
Seaman Apprentice


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 96
Location: Columbus Ohio

PostPosted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 1:48 am    Post subject: That's politics!! Reply with quote

Tigerflyboy

You wrote:
"The charges were all tough, serious -- and wrong, or at least highly misleading. Kerry did not question the war on terrorism, has proposed repealing tax cuts only for those earning more than $200,000, supports wiretaps, has not endorsed a 50-cent gasoline tax increase in 10 years, and continues to support the education changes, albeit with modifications.

Three-quarters of the ads aired by Bush's campaign have been attacks on Kerry. Bush so far has aired 49,050 negative ads in the top 100 markets, or 75 percent of his advertising. Kerry has run 13,336 negative ads -- or 27 percent of his total. The figures were compiled by The Washington Post using data from the Campaign Media Analysis Group of the top 100 U.S. markets. Both campaigns said the figures are accurate."


-- what do you expect 'absolute truth'- in a Presidential Campaign????
\What rock have you been under Shocked

In the part about the negative ads have you calculated the 21 Bush hate groups $$$$ spent on Negative ads??? I've read accounts that Soros has spent $16 million through groups like move-on.org. Michael Moore and his lying hate movie about Bush is probably worth another $30 million. Add it up and the hate speech groups expect to raise and spend $300 million - and every word will be- HATE Bush-in one form or another!! Also that doesn't even count the DNC ads for a $100 million+!!!!
Mad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tigerflyboy
Former Member


Joined: 16 May 2004
Posts: 50
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 2:34 am    Post subject: no I don't Reply with quote

and that's my point, numbers can be shaped to point in the direction you want them to.
I tried to give both side with this article yes both the dem, and rep are guilty of negative ad's.
Cheney is no better than anybody else he out and out lies about fact by picking and choosing them and not giving the whole story whenthey happened or what the circumstances were.
can ya'll not just accept something for it's face value, and not try to turn it into a political statment. these are facts, reported by proven sources, not hearsay. I have been ask in the past to provide facts for my beliefs so here there are and you still question them!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group