SwiftVets.com

GT · Seaman Apprentice Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 90

Dobbs of Wash Post on C-span now

kmmpatriot · Lt.Jg. Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 146

Actually quite interesting. Pretty much hammering on all concerned to release personal journals....pointed out inconsistencies in Brinkley's book....

~Kylie
_________________
The Wise man draws more Advantage from his Enemies, than the Fool from his Friends. - from Poor Richard's Almanac...and a perfect commentary on the current state of this campaign!

GT · Seaman Apprentice Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 90

Dobbs said there's no evidence to prove Kerry wrote the after action report for the Mar 13 incident. He said he spoke to all the skippers about that day, except for Kerry. My question is whether he asked the other skippers if they wrote the report. If they didn't then that would leave Kerry as the author of the report, wouldn't it?

Dimsdale · Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 1:29 pm Post subject:

If the others didn't write the after action report, then Kerry must have by default.

One doesn't necessarily need any testimony from Kerry to put together the real story, as the SBVT are so elegantly proving!
_________________
Everytime he had a choice, Kerry chose to side with communists rather than the United States.

arymann · PO3 Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 269 Location: GA

There was another boat involved, but the skipper of that boat died, I think he said in a later incident. Think his name was Dros.

The biggest question I had was not answered very well--that involved the amount of fire they were supposedly receiving from both banks and why there were no bullet wounds. Dobbs said that was an interesting question and pointed to the fact that Thurlow's boat had three bullet holes.

All in all Dobbs was more fair than most MSM.

arymann · PO3 Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 269 Location: GA

Oh yeah--another thing that jumped out at me was the moderator referring to info he had accessed from the Swiftvets site!

tvaughan · Seaman Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 182

This is something that is starting to drive me crazy.

It is correct that there is not yet any documentation that says, "Kerry is lying".

But there is plenty of evidence that says, "His story makes no sense." Where are the bullet holes? After an 1 hour 1/2 of fire? Why has the story of "no man left behind" changed to "Kerry gunning the engine while every one else helped the 3 boat".

I do not understand why the official version of events is continuously quoted when it is the official version of events that is in dispute.

These are smart people and they are clearly getting it wrong with intent.
_________________
Talking point #1: Sign 180
Talking point #2: Sign 180
Talking point #3: Sign 180