SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Anatomy of a Forgery

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
gator60
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:08 pm    Post subject: Anatomy of a Forgery Reply with quote

"Anatomy of a Forgery
By The Prowler

Published 9/10/2004 12:09:06 AM

More than six weeks ago, an opposition research staffer for the Democratic National Committee received documents purportedly written by President George W. Bush's Texas Air National Guard squadron commander, the late Col. Jerry Killian.

The oppo researcher claimed the source was "a retired military officer." According to a DNC staffer, the documents were seen by both senior staff members at the DNC, as well as the Kerry campaign.

"More than a couple people heard about the papers," says the DNC staffer. "I've heard that they ended up with the Kerry campaign, for them to decide to how to proceed, and presumably they were handed over to 60 Minutes, which used them the other night. But I know this much. When there was discussion here, there were doubts raised about their authenticity."

The concerns arose from the sourcing. "It wasn't clear that our source for the documents would have had access to them. Our person couldn't confirm from what file, from what original source they came from."

The documents that CBS News used were not documents from any of Bush's personnel files from his time in the National Guard. Rather, CBS News stated that they were documents uncovered in the personnel files of Killian. That would explain why the White House or the Pentagon had never before released or even seen them.

According to a Kerry campaign source, there was little gossip about the supposedly hot documents inside the office of the campaign on McPherson Square. "Those documents were not something anyone was talking about or trying to generate buzz on," says the staffer. "It wasn't like there were small groups of people talking about this as a bombshell. I think people here weren't sure what to make of it, because provenance of these documents was uncertain."

A CBS producer, who initially tipped off The Prowler about the 60 Minutes story, says that despite seeking professional assurances that the documents were legitimate, there was uncertainty even among the group of producers and researchers working on the story.

"The problem was we had one set of documents from Bush's file that had Killian calling Bush 'an exceptionally fine young officer and pilot.' And someone who Killian said 'performed in an outstanding manner.' Then you have these new documents and the tone and content are so different."

The CBS producer said that some alarms bells went off last week when the signatures and initials of Killian on the documents in hand did not match up with other documents available on the public record, but producers chose to move ahead with the story. "This was too hot not to push. If there were doubts, those people didn't show it," says the producer, who works on a rival CBS News program.

Now, the producer says, there is growing concern inside the building on 57th Street that they may have been suckered by the Kerry campaign. "There is a school of thought here that the Kerry people dumped this in our laps, figuring we'd do the heavy lifting on the story. That maybe they had doubts about these documents but hoped we'd get more information," says the producer. "If that's the case, then we're bigger fools than we already appear to be judging by all the chatter about how these documents could be forgeries."

ABC News' political unit held a conference call at 7:00 p.m. Thursday evening to discuss the memo and its potential ramifications should the documents turn out to be a forgery. That meeting took place around the time that the deceased Killian's son made public statements questioning the documents' authenticity.

According to one ABC News employee, some reporters believe that the Kerry campaign as well as the DNC were parties in duping CBS, but a smaller segment believe that both the DNC and the Kerry campaign were duped by Karl Rove, who would have engineered the flap to embarrass the opposition.

"



I'm Bithead and I approved this message
@ 9/10/2004 09:25:16 AM
PERMALINK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue9t3
Admiral


Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 1246
Location: oregon

PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:33 pm    Post subject: busted Reply with quote

Camp kerry and 60 min. look like a big fat cat with feathers hanging out thier mouths!
As ratings and poll numbers shrink it will be fun watching them squirm around. Embarassed
_________________
MOPAR-BUYER
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gator60
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:57 pm    Post subject: The F Reply with quote

Iguess now the F in John F Kerry stands for fraud.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LewWaters
Admin


Joined: 18 May 2004
Posts: 4042
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Makes me wonder why CBS wasn't as fast on the claims set forth by Swift vets. They can't be bothered by 60 eyewitness accounts and numeropus inconsistencies within the few records released by Kerry, but can't wait to air anything even remotely anti-Bush.

I guess that's their idea of "fair and balanced."

Maybe Walter Cronkite will come out of retirement to report now how Saddam is really winning the war in Iraq Rolling Eyes
_________________
Clark County Conservative
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vasubvet
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 5
Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was in the Navy in the late 60's. I have a lot of my own personnel records from then. A lot of what has been said about them seems to be true, and these documents appear fake when I compare them with the style of my USN generated paperwork..

The one obvious question that sticks in my mind is whay did the 147th use a PO BOX? They have a physical address in Houston. Call me cynical but "P.O. Box 3-4-5-6-7" Come on !!! Why not 1-2-3-4-5. Some one ought to be able to check this one out with the US Postal Service!!

FTGC (SS), Ret
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Vets and Active Duty Military All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group