EODARMY Seaman
Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 168
|
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 8:04 pm Post subject: SLANDER AGAINST A GENERATION / CULTURE WAR |
|
|
SLANDER AGAINST A GENERATION: In my opinion it is happening again to this generation of soldiers! Stop Kerry and save the current generation!
Snap shot below:
"The flap over Kerry's Vietnam service is a manifestation of an ongoing culture war. On one side are those who believe that Vietnam wasn't that different from other wars: The cause was just, but — like any other war — touched by ambiguities. Those who fought it were doing their duty as they saw it, just as their fathers and grandfathers had done. On the other side are those for whom the Vietnam war represented the very essence of evil. It was not like other wars: It was one continuous atrocity, in which war crimes were normal. Moreover, Americans who fought in it were radically different from earlier U.S. soldiers: They came home psychologically if not physically crippled — homeless, drug-addicted, and likely to commit suicide."
"In his antiwar activism, John Kerry gave credence to the latter view — and thereby helped to slander a generation of soldiers who had done their duty with honor and restraint. Why did he do it? Some of the answers can be found in Douglas Brinkley's new biography of Kerry, Tour of Duty: John Kerry and the Vietnam War; but, ultimately, it is Kerry himself who will have to explain to his fellow veterans why he chose a path that dishonors their service."
"Today, Senator Kerry appeals to veterans in his quest for the White House. He invokes his Vietnam service at every turn. But . . . how can he? If he believes his 1971 indictment of his country and his fellow veterans was true, then he couldn't possibly be proud of his Vietnam service. Who can be proud of committing war crimes of the sort that Kerry recounted in his 1971 testimony? But if he is proud of his service today, perhaps it is because he always knew that his indictment in 1971 was a piece of political theater that he, an aspiring politician, exploited merely as a "good issue." If the latter is true, he should apologize to all the men who served in that war, for slandering them to advance his political fortunes."
Please read: http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/owens200404230859.asp |
|