SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FBI Infiltrators at VVAW meetings

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Kerry - VVAW Leadership & "Wintersoldier"
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Aristotle The Hun
PO1


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 488
Location: Naples FL

PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:59 pm    Post subject: FBI Infiltrators at VVAW meetings Reply with quote

I served as Campus Chaplain at UMKC in Kansas City. Our denomination allowed VVAW to meet at our facility. I was invited to join VVAW as the local chapter Chaplain.

I don't have any details on Kerry, but local VVAW leadership was always resisting the more radical elements in our group. More than once, we found out that our more radical members were actually FBI agents.

Sam
_________________
Deportè Monsieur Kerrè
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting.

How did you find out that the radical ones were FBI infiltrators? Was it word of mouth? What kind of proof did you have, or was it merely anecdotal.

It used to be a common accusation - that all the troublemaking in the anti-war movement was coming from the infiltrators.

I only vaguely remember my father talking about this.

If they'd have done much of this kind of thing, it would seem that they were setting themselves up for entrapment charges. Question
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aristotle The Hun
PO1


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 488
Location: Naples FL

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Navy_Navy_Navy wrote:
Interesting.

How did you find out that the radical ones were FBI infiltrators? Was it word of mouth? What kind of proof did you have, or was it merely anecdotal.

It used to be a common accusation - that all the troublemaking in the anti-war movement was coming from the infiltrators.

I only vaguely remember my father talking about this.

If they'd have done much of this kind of thing, it would seem that they were setting themselves up for entrapment charges. Question


First, entrapment is a defense, not a "charge”. Do you remember who was in charge of the FBI? J. Edgar Hoover. Hoover was not much intimidated by the courts, or legal protocol.

I will summarize my story. It probably isn’t important enough to include the details. The FBI guys stood out. Whatever this forum might think about VVAW members, we were all veterans. We could tell the difference between a veteran and an agent provocateur. The FBI guys were pretending to be violent political radicals. They could provide us with a target, the resources, funds, the explosives etc. None of us wanted to do such things, but they just kept insisting. Finally we confronted 2 of them and asked them to come up with documentation as to their military credentials. They never showed up at a meeting again.

The most radical thing our chapter ever did was take over the top floor of city hall and run the flag upside down. Oh, yes we also did illegal skinny dipping in a state park where we had a gathering.

My role was to keep them level headed and question ethical decisions. I also prayed in the usual ritual way clergy rare asked to perform at social functions. I buried their dead (I remember a particularly poignant suicide), did wedding ceremonies, baptisms, and other things you might imagine a campus chaplain doing.

I probably don’t need to explain myself further as I suppose you are aware of my other posts and know where I stand today.

And don’t underestimate “anecdotal” as “merely”. Sometimes anecdotal is the only remnant of truth available. I would guess that the Swiftvets know this.

Sam
_________________
Deportè Monsieur Kerrè
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Me#1You#10
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 6503

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aristotle The Hun wrote:
And don’t underestimate “anecdotal” as “merely”. Sometimes anecdotal is the only remnant of truth available. I would guess that the Swiftvets know this.

Sam


They also know the difference between public testimony and anonymity, as well as an affidavit and an anecdote.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aristotle The Hun
PO1


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 488
Location: Naples FL

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me#1You#10 wrote:
Aristotle The Hun wrote:
And don’t underestimate “anecdotal” as “merely”. Sometimes anecdotal is the only remnant of truth available. I would guess that the Swiftvets know this.

Sam


They also know the difference between public testimony and anonymity, as well as an affidavit and an anecdote.


I don't understand how that might apply to my post, but I am gratified that the policy is as you stated.

Sam
_________________
Deportè Monsieur Kerrè
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Hammer2
PO2


Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 387
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't doubt that there were FBI infiltrators. A responsible government has to be aware of the activities of and individuals behind any potentially subversive organization.
I well remember the accusations by the left at the time that the real violent ones were government agents. Most such stories were baloney.

There was a little truth to it however. Most information I could find involved the FBI COINTELPRO program of the time. The execrpt and link at the bottom are the only credible, well researched information about FBI & Govt. domestic intelligence operations I could find. All of the rest were leftist propaganda of one sort or another. A very few were right wing conspiracy nuts. The first link falls into the leftist category.

The left's view:
http://www.phillyimc.org/articles/00/08/04/199236.shtml

See this article that was contemporary to the time:
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/10584

This is the most famous one that everyone pointed to as proof:
http://www.hws.edu/news/update/showwebclip.asp?webclipid=1300

This is an excerpt from:

FINAL REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
April 23, 1976

Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW)

Letter to all offices dated 8/3/71 instructed each office to initiate a survey to determine existence of VVAW. This action was necessary in the light of increasing indication that the VVAW may be a target for infiltration by subversive groups such as the Communist Party USA and the Socialist Workers Party and their respective youth groups. VVAW has also been involved in aiding and financing U.S. deserters, including false identity papers and reportedly in one area has a cache of arms. VVAW has become increasingly active in the antiwar field and must be considered a prime target for infiltration. 587

Link to full report:

http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIIg.htm

Rather lengthy, but worth wading through.


I hope this helps clear things up.
_________________
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilence" - Thomas Jefferson
"An armed society is a polite society" - Thomas Jefferson
"The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it won't be needed until someone tries to take it away." -- Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
85 Scott
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 43

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe the VVAW had plenty of it's own radicals, although maybe not at all locations nationwide.

Consider how quickly the pro-communist VVAWAI spawned from it's beginnings in the VVAW during the mid 1970's. How Florida VVAW member Scott Camil has not denied his 1971 plan to assassinate US Senators.

And logically, just look at the typical leftist kooks that protest today.

The overwhelming majority are terribly un-informed, but they still despise this country with a vengence anyway. Almost every protest seems to have protesters that vandalize things.

So I'd have to say I believe the FBI files are the real deal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aristotle The Hun wrote:
First, entrapment is a defense, not a "charge”.

"Entrapment" is also a charge that a defendant makes against law enforcement officers.


Quote:
Whatever this forum might think about VVAW members, we were all veterans.

You are speaking only of your own chapter, right?


Quote:
We could tell the difference between a veteran and an agent provocateur. The FBI guys were pretending to be violent political radicals. They could provide us with a target, the resources, funds, the explosives etc. None of us wanted to do such things, but they just kept insisting. Finally we confronted 2 of them and asked them to come up with documentation as to their military credentials. They never showed up at a meeting again.



Well, you've certainly made some interesting claims and some that have been repeated in the past. I wouldn't rule it out, but nothing you said has convinced me.

First, you said that VVAW members were all veterans. So the "agent provacateurs" must have provided the same proof as anyone else that they had been in Vietnam, right?

Second, what you've said sounds more in line with what I've read and seen in other places - that the extremism and radicalism came mostly from SDS and WeatherUnderground-type infiltrators, borrowing upon the credibility and relatively non-threatening nature of the already-established VVAW.

The propaganda and the tools and know-how were furnished by the KGB, along with any necessary documentation required for entrance into the VVAW - so they would have seemed to be "vetted vets," just as any FBI infiltrator would have been.

Playing into this, there was a "nudge, nudge, wink, wink" regard for vetting members, when a membership requirement existed. Still waiting on your 214? No problem. You were at Fort Dix for that? Don't you mean Fort Hood?

At other times, the membership requirement was completely dropped.

Who had more to gain and lose from this type of incitement? The SDS, who openly wanted to kill cops and destroy other targets of the Establishment, (but could not put together a credible membership) or the FBI?

I'm not saying that at the time, you were not completely convinced that the FBI had infiltrated your group with a couple of bad actors, or that you're still convinced of that, today - I'm not even saying that it didn't happen.

All I'm saying is that the space of some years and the vision of some different vantage points could lead you to a different conclusion today about who those bad actors might have been.

The FBI simply could not have done all of the things which they were accused of doing, but the FBI agent-as-instigator is a myth of powerful proportions, even today.

It sounds as though you have had a very interesting life.
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aristotle The Hun
PO1


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 488
Location: Naples FL

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All I'm saying is that the space of some years and the vision of some different vantage points could lead you to a different conclusion today about who those bad actors might have been.

The FBI simply could not have done all of the things which they were accused of doing, but the FBI agent-as-instigator is a myth of powerful proportions, even today.

It sounds as though you have had a very interesting life.[/quote]

Thanks to the posts made by you and others I now know more about the situation than I ever have.

I just assumed the "bad eggs" were FBI. It never occured to me that they might be something else. And you were right about membership vetting. Almost anyone who "said" they were a veteran was allowed to join and were not questioned unless they called attenetion to themselves later.

I have a counter on my web page and there are several hits from Swiftvets so I guess you folks are better at vetting than VVAW. Thanks for taking into account where I stand now. I would not want to be seen as still being sympathetic to VVAW.

And, yes I continue to have an interesting life. Likely to get more interesting by the weekend. Charlie, Frances, and now Ivan seem more real than politics these days.

Sam
_________________
Deportè Monsieur Kerrè
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aristotle The Hun wrote:

And, yes I continue to have an interesting life. Likely to get more interesting by the weekend. Charlie, Frances, and now Ivan seem more real than politics these days.



Ohmigosh, yes - you have definitely had your share of immediacies, lately. Sad

We have so many members in Florida - our good thoughts and prayers are certainly with you, these days. It must feel unrelenting, right about now.

Be safe, all of you Floridians!

Now, back on topic for me...
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Kerry - VVAW Leadership & "Wintersoldier" All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group