SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Set up near complete - closing the deal.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jim_nyc
Seaman


Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:32 pm    Post subject: Set up near complete - closing the deal. Reply with quote

Not a veteran. Don’t feel qualified or worthy to post. But I have donated some money so I hope you will indulge me this one and probably only post.

First thank anyone who may be reading this who has served this country in the armed forces in any capacity. Thank you, thank you, thank you!

Second I believe with all the talk around Bush's guard service it has primed the civilian populace and educated them in the arcane workings of the military. Meaning it will make the nail easier to drive because we now understand when you are officially a soldier and when you are not.

Kerry was officially still a Navy officer under oath to serve this country and obey military laws when he met with the enemy in Paris. That is treason. Now maybe there is some wiggle room but on a very basic level I think the civilian population will be able to grasp that now. I think it is a deal closer.

TV/print/radio ads would be effective in my opinion if released just prior to the debates clearly stating this treasonous act as the fact that it is. It should be on the tip of everyone’s mind as the candidates debate. Maybe, even prompting one of the moderators (fat chance) to ask about it in the debate itself.

Third, prior to that it would be great if the message could be made clear that Kerry's assessment of what would result when the United States withdrew from South Vietnam was wrong in the extreme. Not to be too crass or exploitive but if a TV add contrasting what Kerry actually said at the 1971 congressional hearing juxtaposed with an actual South Vietnamese citizen now living in the USA may make for a powerful indictment on his ability to craft military strategy. It might go some distance in explaining to people who feel the war was wrong why we were there and what horrible things happened when we left.

Finally I wish to extend my most sincere gratitude and best wishes for all of the founding members of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. Regardless of what happens in the election you men have proven your mettle once again. All American citizens are forever in your debt. You can hold your heads high and continue on with your private lives knowing that you did the best you could to right the wrongs and defend our country. Bless you. Bless you all from myself and my children. You are true American heroes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SangRun Hunter
PO1


Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 462
Location: Zinzinnati

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have good ideas and I wouldn't let the fact you are not vet deter you from posting.

I'm not a vet either, but I love this country and I will stand with the SBVT as I was taught to respect this country and those that served it.

You sound like a person that respects all of that.
_________________
Mad as Hell!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Theresa Alwood
Rear Admiral


Joined: 05 Jun 2004
Posts: 631
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a forum that is for vets only - so feel free to post!

Thanks for the donation as it is important that the word continue to spread about who and what John Kerry is.

Welcome aboard!
_________________
Born to raise a little hell!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
noc
PO1


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 492
Location: Dublin, CA

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great words Jim

I hope you decide to stay a while keep posting. You will find that you CAN make a difference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chance
Seaman Recruit


Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 39
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:13 pm    Post subject: Maybe I'm wrong Reply with quote

but I think the fact that Kerry was actually Naval RESERVE should be stressed more often. Maybe I'm off the wall on this but it seems to me that what he did is not much different than what he's trying to accuse Bush of doing. Actually, I would not ever say that I think he (Kerry) served his country courageously. He makes me sick and to think that I would ever compare him with the vets that actually did is a fantasy. This of course is just my opinion as I'm not a vet but am the proud daughter of a WWII vet, the wife of a Viet Nam Vet, and the mother-in-law of 3 wonderful guys who served and/or are now serving. I couldn't be any more proud of all of them, and those of you who did!
Kerry is a big joke in my book!
_________________
Chance
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hammer2
PO2


Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 387
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Maybe I'm wrong Reply with quote

Chance wrote:
but I think the fact that Kerry was actually Naval RESERVE should be stressed more often. Maybe I'm off the wall on this but it seems to me that what he did is not much different than what he's trying to accuse Bush of doing. Actually, I would not ever say that I think he (Kerry) served his country courageously. He makes me sick and to think that I would ever compare him with the vets that actually did is a fantasy. This of course is just my opinion as I'm not a vet but am the proud daughter of a WWII vet, the wife of a Viet Nam Vet, and the mother-in-law of 3 wonderful guys who served and/or are now serving. I couldn't be any more proud of all of them, and those of you who did!
Kerry is a big joke in my book!


It would be more accurate to say that Kerry had a reserve commission. He actually served in the Navy in Vietnam, not in the reserves. When a reservist is on active duty he is in the regular service. The reserve commission means that the active duty status is considered temporary, rather than permanent. Most ROTC commissions are reserve commissions. Most academy commissions are regular commissions.

My Dad was an exception. He joind the Navy in 1943 when he turned 17. After his discharge, he enrolled in Army ROTC at the University of Michigan. He was given a regular Army commission when he graduated. He served an additional 17 years in the Army and retired as a LtCol in 1970 with a total of 25 years of service. He told me that a RA commission was rare and considered an honor by those fortunate enough to be considered worthy to recieve one.
_________________
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilence" - Thomas Jefferson
"An armed society is a polite society" - Thomas Jefferson
"The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it won't be needed until someone tries to take it away." -- Thomas Jefferson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Montana
Lt.Jg.


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 138
Location: Montana

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great first post Jim_nyc. I like the way you think Very Happy
Some of your points are very good.

Many supporters (and neutral folks) say that Kerry
had the right to protest (like so many others). Many
don´t realize that Kerry was a commissioned officer
in the naval reserve during this entire period.

It doesn´t
matter whether he was in a drill status or non-drill status,
active or inactive reserves, selective reserves, standby
reserves or ready reserves. All personnel in all categories
are subject to recall and subject to the Uniform Code
of Military Conduct and the US Constitution. Kerry, as
a commissioned officer in the US Naval Reserve, violated
the UCMJ and the US Constitution. Furthermore,
he did it with impunity (without punishiment or imprisonment).

He gave aid and comfort to the enemy and extended the imprisonment
of our POWs. He also contributed to the extention of the war.

And the list goes on and on.

The point needs to be driven home that Kerry was a commissioned
officer not a civilian. Civilians can do all sorts of things and
get away with it. Kerry took an oath and was still under that oath.

Montana
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LimaCharlie
PO2


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 386
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 4:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Maybe I'm wrong Reply with quote

Hammer2 wrote:

It would be more accurate to say that Kerry had a reserve commission. He actually served in the Navy in Vietnam, not in the reserves. When a reservist is on active duty he is in the regular service. The reserve commission means that the active duty status is considered temporary, rather than permanent. Most ROTC commissions are reserve commissions. Most academy commissions are regular commissions.


Enlisted and officers on active duty in the Navy hold either USN status or USN(R) status. Kerry held a USN(R) commission from the time he was commissioned, including his active duty, until his permanent discharge in 1978. With very few exceptions, USN status for junior officers is reserved for graduates of the Naval Academy.

On another note, George Bush did the equivalent of 2.6 years of active duty during his six year commitment in the TANG. Each day of active duty counts as one point. Each Guard/Reserve drill counts as one point. If you ignore all of the other flack, George Bush is credited with more service than John Kerry for retirement.
_________________
I was going to become an anarchist, but they had too many rules.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rdtf
CNO


Joined: 13 May 2004
Posts: 2209
Location: BUSHville

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok this is wishful thinking, but, Is there a statute of limitations on charging an officer with the crimes Kerry committed? If a court martial is no longer possible, then it seems the discharge should at least be dishonorable. I just can't understand how he was able to get away with such blatant disrespect for the oaths he took.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LimaCharlie
PO2


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 386
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, he should have gone to jail back then. When it occurred, the media, political, and public opinions were against the Viet Nam conflict and growing. It would have been a career ending move to charge him.

Yes, he could probably go to jail now. Look at what happened with Clinton’s impeachment. It would be a career ending move to indict him now. The worldwide combination of the Communists, socialists, appeasers, useful fools, and other far left would be out for blood.

In my opinion, conservatives are outnumbered by liberals. Our only salvation is we vote for our ideas while they rally against our ideas.
_________________
I was going to become an anarchist, but they had too many rules.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NavyChief
Rear Admiral


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 627
Location: Boise, Idaho

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rdtf wrote:
Ok this is wishful thinking, but, Is there a statute of limitations on charging an officer with the crimes Kerry committed? If a court martial is no longer possible, then it seems the discharge should at least be dishonorable. I just can't understand how he was able to get away with such blatant disrespect for the oaths he took.


There is no statue of limitation on Treason charges.

- assassin
_________________
Working with Senator Kerry four years in the POW/MIA Office left me thinking -- when did the man ever do any work?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
one more captins mast
LCDR


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 438
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 7:31 pm    Post subject: Kerry's leadership????????????????????? Reply with quote

Read a copy of "Tragic Mountians" by Jane Hamilton'Merritt
published by Indina University Press


tells with tears what his, "only a few" will

suffer if we pull out statement.
_________________
the strange mr aj
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Navy_Navy_Navy
Admin


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 5777

PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is "Tragic Mountains" about, aj? The Montagnards, I'm guessing?
_________________
~ Echo Juliet ~
Altering course to starboard - On Fire, Keep Clear
Navy woman, Navy wife, Navy mother
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jim_nyc
Seaman


Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 198

PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the tip on the book “Tragic Mountains” regarding the fate of the Hmong peoples of Laos. I looked it up on Amazon. I’ll see if it’s at the library.

I know it’s a pipe dream to think Kerry would ever be brought to justice for his treason. Particularly, since it would appear to the general public that Bush was imprisoning his political opponents. Not a good look. The purpose of exposing this festering wound is to merely keep him for being sworn in as POTUS were he has the opportunity once again to break his sworn oath to protect this country from it’s enemies.

Here is the message I would like to see running non stop on all the networks.

Narrator: While a commissioned officer in the United States Naval Reserves John Kerry went to Paris, France, and without the qualified permission or authority to represent the interests of the United States government he negotiated with the enemy, the North Vietcong. His sworn testimony before the UNITED STATES SENATE; COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, in 1971 proves this beyond a shadow of a doubt.

John Kerry: I have been to Paris. I have talked with both delegations at the peace talks, that is to say the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government …….

Narrator: According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice a code he swore an oath to uphold, John Kerry committed treason. That is a very serious charge but the evidence is unarguable. By his own words John Kerry acknowledged he is a traitor. John Kerry, does his oath mean anything at all? Can we take the chance he would keep his oath as president of this great country?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rdtf
CNO


Joined: 13 May 2004
Posts: 2209
Location: BUSHville

PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excellent. Wish they'd hammer it into the American public's brain.
Isn't it amazing that something so obvious as this is ignored by so many? That is what makes it so frustrating. Even liberals blinded by what is fueling them should see it and it should matter. It just seems like a no brainer, as simple as 'don't touch the hot stove' or if you try to breath under water you'll die. Welcome to politics, I guess.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group