SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Truth about Free Fire Zones and their misuse sometimes
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ASPB
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1680

PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Old Kayaker wrote:

Quote:
I believe there was a lot wrong with the way the Vietnam War was fought. Apparently, you think it was fought correctly. And thats the crux of the matter here. I can't believe you and the Hoffman O'Neill group really wanted the Vietnam War to go on , and on, and on as it was being fought*! But, apparently you all did!


Would you be so kind as to provide some evidence to support your absurd allegation that anyone in this forum or in Swiftvets has "ever" said the war was conducted correctly? This is not only absurd, it's truly offensive.

Nuff Said.
_________________
On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB


Last edited by ASPB on Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
waltjones
PO2


Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 392
Location: 'bout 40 miles north of Seattle

PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:43 pm    Post subject: Conduct of the war Reply with quote

ASPB: Well, he did ask. I ignored his questions because they were so irrelevant to his original post. I agree with you , though, that I haven't heard any 'Nam vet say they totally agreed with the way the war was conducted. Hell, even Bush says it was a political war! oldkayaker, perhaps it would be more effective if you opened a new topic on how the war was conducted; I think you'll get more action that way, and this thread won't stretch out forever.

Semper Fi!
_________________
Walt Jones (USMC, '65 - '69) It says much about the person who defends a man with no honor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldkayaker
Ensign


Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 1:18 am    Post subject: FFZ .... misuse Reply with quote

:...Would you be so kind as to provide some evidence to support your absurd allegation that anyone in this forum or in Swiftvets has "ever" said the war was conducted correctly?..."

I asked for points of agreement from Hoffman/O'Neill group etal....including whether we could agree that the war was not conductedly correctly and...got no answer. From that lack of response, I drew the conclusion that you all think the Vietnam War was conducted correctly. Confused

"...ASPB: Well, he did ask. I ignored his questions because they were so irrelevant to his original post. I agree with you , though, that I haven't heard any 'Nam vet say they totally agreed with the way the war was conducted. Hell, even Bush says it was a political war! oldkayaker, perhaps it would be more effective if you opened a new topic on how the war was conducted; I think you'll get more action that way, and this thread won't stretch out forever...."

Ignore, you did. And perhaps you missed the point that it was how that war was conducted that was the CRUX of Kerry's testimony and part of the cause of FFZ misuse. Its all relevent to the same problem. Lets keep it here and focus, folks. You'll eventually see the light! Cool


Oldkayaker / John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ASPB
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1680

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 1:47 am    Post subject: Re: FFZ .... misuse Reply with quote

oldkayaker wrote:
:...Would you be so kind as to provide some evidence to support your absurd allegation that anyone in this forum or in Swiftvets has "ever" said the war was conducted correctly?..."

I asked for points of agreement from Hoffman/O'Neill group etal....including whether we could agree that the war was not conductedly correctly and...got no answer. From that lack of response, I drew the conclusion that you all think the Vietnam War was conducted correctly. Confused

"...ASPB: Well, he did ask. I ignored his questions because they were so irrelevant to his original post. I agree with you , though, that I haven't heard any 'Nam vet say they totally agreed with the way the war was conducted. Hell, even Bush says it was a political war! oldkayaker, perhaps it would be more effective if you opened a new topic on how the war was conducted; I think you'll get more action that way, and this thread won't stretch out forever...."

Ignore, you did. And perhaps you missed the point that it was how that war was conducted that was the CRUX of Kerry's testimony and part of the cause of FFZ misuse. Its all relevent to the same problem. Lets keep it here and focus, folks. You'll eventually see the light! Cool


Oldkayaker / John


The crux of the matter was how the war was conducted by the liberal politicians that you support. Kerry was not wrong about Johnson and other minions of his own party screwing up the war. It was his statements about you, me, everyone else that was in country being "baby killers" BS! BS! BS! Are you really so blind?

Get a GD clue and put the blame where it lies; not on the military but on the liberal administration and the liberal vote grubbing Congress; Not on the guys or their combat commanders who, by the Constitution, had to take direction from a bunch of DEMOCRATIC civilian political opportunists like Kerry.

For God's sake man, do think if Johnson had been re-elected in '68 Kerry would have been attacking the administration? If so, you are naive beyond belief. Johnson walked away after screwing it up and left Nixon in a viper pit of political whores like Kerry! Kerry's just the current generation of the same slime. Do F'ing Democrats irritate me? Damn right they do. The last semi-decent demo was the real JFK. The last real one in the presidency was Harry Truman.

Argue with someone else. I'm tired of your mierda de toro!
_________________
On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB


Last edited by ASPB on Sun Jun 13, 2004 2:06 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
oldkayaker
Ensign


Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 1:52 am    Post subject: FFZ ... misuse Reply with quote

Now you got it!

"...The crux of the matter was how the war was conducted by the liberal politicians that you support. Kerry was not wrong about Johnson and other minions of his own party screwing up the war. It was his statements about you, me, everyone else that was in country being "baby killers" BS! BS! BS! Are you really so blind!

Get a GD clue and put the blame where it lies; not on the military but on the liberal administration and the liberal vote grubbing Congress; Not on the guys or their combat commanders who, by the Constitution, had to take direction from a bunch of DEMOCRATIC civilian political opportunists like Kerry. He's just the new generation of the same slime. .."

Kerry was doing just that, putting the blame were it belonged. Not on the soldiers and sailors but on the policy makers. Finally, you have seen the light! Pass it on! Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
War Dog
Captain


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 517
Location: Below Birmingham Alabama

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 2:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Kerry was doing just that, putting the blame were it belonged. Not on the soldiers and sailors but on the policy makers. Finally, you have seen the light! Pass it on!


Then Kerry should have talked about how the war was fought incorrectly, how it was run from Washington, DC in the friggin White House and not by the Generals incountry. He should have talked about how screwed up the Government, Pentagon and White House was. He should have talked about the pain that the troops were enduring in Vietnam, not being allowed to win the war like the military knew how to win that war. He should have talked about the troops being killed and wounded and MIA over in Vietnam. There were hundreds of things Kerry should have talked about.

But no, he talked about all the war crimes, the atrocities, the murders, the rapes, the killing of innocent civilians, water buffalo, livestock, burning villages, free fire zones. All these he tried to blame on the officers from the front lines over in Vietnam all the way up to the Pentagon. But by making the statement that these things happened on a regular, routine basis in effect called every Marine, Soldier, Sailor and Airman over in Vietnam a War Criminal, A Murderer, a Rapist. He accused each and every one of them of committing war crimes, murders, rapes, atrocities, and so on. He gave the impression to Congress and to the American People that all the troops over in SEA, and not just Vietnam was having a great old time just killing everybody they wanted to, killing old men, old women, young men, young women, children; raping women and young girls, torchuring the Vietnamese, killing all the animals they could find, burning down all the villages, and so on.

Oh yeah, he blamed it all on the officers and higher ups, saying that they not only condoned this, but ordered it to happen on a daily, routine basis, with full authority of all superiors and command structure from the lowest O-1 all the way up to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Sounds like you are the one that really needs to see the light on this matter. If you either can't understand or don't want to understand what Kerry and the rest of the anti-war movement did to the Vietnam Veterans, including yourself, then you are living in that land of denial!

Woof!
_________________
"When people are in trouble, they call the cops.

When cops need help, they call the K-9 unit."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rbshirley
Founder


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 394

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 2:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

War Dog wrote:
There were hundreds of things Kerry should have talked about.
But no, he talked about all the war crimes, the atrocities, ....


This talk of "who authorized who to do what," and what "Kerry did or did not say
about his own activities in Vietnam," pales by comparision to what Kerry actually
popularized in the media and in his testimony before congress in the early 1970's.

Per my previous posts on this board, I know of which I speak with regard to this
particular thread's discussion.

PLEASE ...

Go to the thread on this forum "John Kerry's Contribution to Winning the Peace?"
for more pertinent opinions on what he actually popularized: By anti-war activists
and draft dodgers, the Communist Government of Vietnam, the current generation
of South Vietnamese, and even my own personal tragedy resulting from his 1970's
activities that are considered so shameful by so many.

.


Last edited by rbshirley on Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:42 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
carpro
Admin


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 1176
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:20 am    Post subject: Re: FFZ ... misuse Reply with quote

oldkayaker wrote:
Kerry was doing just that, putting the blame were it belonged. Not on the soldiers and sailors but on the policy makers. Finally, you have seen the light! Pass it on! Wink



Right thesis. Dead wrong conclusion. I knew that was where you were headed withyour twisted logic so didn't bother to answer your questions.

I suspect War Dog and ASPB knew it , too, but decided to give you a chance to prove them wrong. You didn't.
_________________
"If he believes his 1971 indictment of his country and his fellow veterans was true, then he couldn't possibly be proud of his Vietnam service."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
waltjones
PO2


Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 392
Location: 'bout 40 miles north of Seattle

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe oldkayak is being deliberately obtuse; this is known as disingenuousness. There's also another word for it. He's in denial about what Kerry did, guys, and I for one will ignore him unless he wants to open a new thread on his continually shifting topic. I can't believe he read Kerry's testimony, or he can't recognize lies when he sees them! Like I said before, I wonder how he can live with himself - I mean, c'mon, oldkayak: Kerry's a sociopath; what's your excuse?

Semper Fi!
_________________
Walt Jones (USMC, '65 - '69) It says much about the person who defends a man with no honor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
War Dog
Captain


Joined: 10 May 2004
Posts: 517
Location: Below Birmingham Alabama

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those who understand, understand!

Those who do not understand, will never understand!


Now, the question you have to ask yourself is it:

Because they do not want to understand

They only are seeing/believing what they want

They are too stupid to understand

They are lying and haven't read the Kerry Testimony

Part of the above

All of the above!

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Very Interesting! :8

Woof!
_________________
"When people are in trouble, they call the cops.

When cops need help, they call the K-9 unit."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rbshirley
Founder


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 394

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

War Dog wrote:
Those who understand, understand!

Those who do not understand, will never understand!


"All lies in jest. And a man hears what he wants to hear"
...................... "And disregards the rest" .....................

From Simon and Garfunkle "The Boxer"

"In the clearing stands a boxer. A fighter by his trade"
"And he carries the reminders of every glove that laid him down"
"Or cut him til he cried out in has anger and his shame"
"I am leaving. I am leaving. But the fighter still remains"

I have been laid down and cut by by Kerry
And I cry out in my anger and my shame.
But I STILL, and WILL forever, remain

A Swift Boat Sailor that DOES NOT support Kerry


.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
oldkayaker
Ensign


Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:32 pm    Post subject: FFZ .... misuse Reply with quote

Well, well, well...we have some light shining through although there is still lots of darkness.

We can agree that the Vietnam War was fought incorrectly. I think I can see some agreement on that point through all the above.

So, since the war was fought incorrectly, what was the fallout of that? Well, for one thing, too much decision making was placed in the hands of grunts on the ground.

Maybe if we use a little dramatic dialogue, it might help:
What the policy makers in Washington told the soldier or sailor, in effect was, "Come here soldier or sailor, take this list of ROEs, now you decide who is the enemy and you kill him." "We don't want this mess to turn into a WAR, we just want you to stop Communism where you find it in the South, but don't you dare go into the North where Communism rules because that might really trigger a WAR." "Now, we are going to help you by designating areas where if you think the enemy is there, you can fire your weapons and we will clearly mark those areas as Free Fire Zones." "And we have given you additional tools to fight this type of warfare called seach and destroy and harassment and interdiction." "Now, use those tools carefully and remember, only kill Communists."

Yep, those were the marching orders! And Kerry performed under those orders, as did we all did (at least I know I did). The big difference being that Kerry came back to the Washington policy makers and told them that those marching orders were stupid, wrong, and ineffective in their execution. And that when he followed those marching orders, that sometimes he felt like a criminal; but, of course he was not since he and his comrades were only following those orders. And he said that fighting in Vietnam under those marching orders will not resolve anything and only waste money, time and lives, ad nauseam. And of course, he was right!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ASPB
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 1680

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, since the war was fought incorrectly, what was the fallout of that? Well, for one thing, too much decision making was placed in the hands of grunts on the ground.

Wrong! No fuzzy logic can cut through the truth Kayaker. Why don't you give it up? It ain't gonna fly or swim other than with teenage liberals that, like you apparently, never took a logic or a history class.
_________________
On Sale! Order in lots of 100 now at velero@rcn.com Free for the cost of shipping All profits (if any, especially now) go to Swiftvets. The author of "Sink Kerry Swiftly" ---ASPB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DougReese
Former Member


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 396

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

War Dog wrote:
Those who understand, understand!

Those who do not understand, will never understand!


Now, the question you have to ask yourself is it:

Because they do not want to understand

They only are seeing/believing what they want

They are too stupid to understand

They are lying and haven't read the Kerry Testimony

Part of the above

All of the above!

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Very Interesting! :8

Woof!


And I thought this was turning into a kinder, gentler place Smile

Doug
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
waltjones
PO2


Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 392
Location: 'bout 40 miles north of Seattle

PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe it would get a little kinder if oldkayak would address what Kerry actually said. You know the game he's playing, Doug. We provide the quotes by Kerry and he simply won't address the details of Kerry's slander. If you don't see it as such, oldkayak, then we have nothing further to discuss. We have concluded you don't want to see - and Doug, I don't think you want to look at it too closely either. Please see what's next to my name below as to why. Thatisall ....
_________________
Walt Jones (USMC, '65 - '69) It says much about the person who defends a man with no honor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Swift Vets and POWs for Truth All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 7 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group