SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Bolton Accuser Ford told Col. Peck to fake POW Investigation

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SBD
Admiral


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 1022

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:22 am    Post subject: Bolton Accuser Ford told Col. Peck to fake POW Investigation Reply with quote

A witness in 1991 at a Congressional Hearing to discuss evidence of POW's that might still be alive and held in Vietnam quoted Col Peck regarding evidence as saying that" Former Deputy Defense Secretary Carl W. Ford Jr. urged Col Peck to merely "go through the motions, (saying) this is a political issue and (urging) that we make the appearance of progress." This is the kind of witness that we are to believe in his current Congressional testimony, one that urges others testifying to fake progress on such an important issue? I think NOT!! Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad

Copyright 1991 The Times Mirror Company; Los Angeles Times

May 31, 1991
POWS MAY STILL BE HELD IN SOUTHEAST ASIA, EX--PENTAGON OFFICIAL SAYS; VIETNAM WAR: BUT COL. MILLARD A. PECK CONCEDES THAT HIS CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY IS ONLY SPECULATION.
By KAREN TUMULTY, TIMES STAFF WRITER

The Army colonel who recently resigned as head of the Pentagon's special office for prisoners of war and missing in action told members of Congress on Thursday that there is a "strong possibility" that American POWs from the Vietnam War are still in Southeast Asia, kept there against their will.
Col. Millard A. Peck, himself a Vietnam veteran, conceded that his congressional testimony is only speculation. But he contended that the U.S. government has not made "an honest effort" to uncover the truth.
When Peck resigned his Defense Intelligence Agency post in late March, he stapled to his office door a scathing five-- page memorandum containing numerous allegations of conspiracy and possible cover--up.

Until Thursday's testimony, however, he had not said whether he believes that U.S. servicemen are still being held in Southeast Asia. Peck, who has asked the Army for permission to retire, appeared before the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on Asian and Pacific affairs in full uniform, his chest covered with six rows of decorations. His public testimony before the panel included little solid evidence to back his assertions. Pressed repeatedly for more details, he cited the need to protect classified information and asked to be allowed to provide them in closed session.

Some lawmakers who attended the closed session later said that they were still unconvinced. "Col. Peck has not, in either the open or the closed session, presented convincing evidence of some sort of Machiavellian conspiracy to suppress evidence," subcommittee Chairman Stephen J. Solarz (D--N.Y.) told reporters. Solarz termed it "unfortunate" that Peck has created the "impression that there is some kind of conspiracy here by
leading officials of the United States, (because) I don't believe that is the case."

But others who attended the closed session suggested that Peck had made a convincing case that the government has not vigorously pursued every avenue to learn the fates of more than 2,200 Vietnam--era servicemen still listed as missing in action, an effort that President Bush has described as having "highest national priority." "He has been working on this issue with a kind of enthusiasm which I find lacking in some other people there," said California Rep. David Dreier (R--La Verne). "I happen to think that this man has a lot to say."

Sources who attended the closed session said that Peck was highly critical of a number of members of the POW--MIA Interagency Group, which guides government policy on the issue. The group includes high--level representatives from the Pentagon, State Department and National Security Council, as well as Ann Mills Griffiths, executive director of the
National League of Families of American Prisoners and Missing in Southeast Asia.

One person who attended the closed session said Peck alleged that Deputy Defense Secretary Carl W. Ford Jr. urged him to merely "go through the motions, (saying) this is a political issue and (urging) that we make the appearance of progress." Lt. Cmdr. Ned Lundquist, a Pentagon spokesman, declined to comment on Peck's statements about Ford.

In his public testimony, Peck insisted repeatedly that he had never intended for his resignation memorandum to become public. The memo echoed the arguments that many POW--MIA activists have been making for almost two decades, contentions that have always been denied by the Pentagon. The document was all the more startling given Peck's own previous public assertions that the Pentagon was doing what it could to uncover evidence about MIAs.

The government declared after the return of 591 POWs in 1973 that it had no evidence any more prisoners were alive in Indochina. However, Peck speculated Thursday that, when the peace accords were signed, "our opponents at the time realized that they were not going to be content with the gains that they had made at that point," and therefore held back some
prisoners as hostages.

"I don't think these (prisoners) are out working in the fields per se, I think they're in closely guarded facilities," Peck said.
Times staff writer Michael Ross contributed to this report.

SBD


Last edited by SBD on Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:59 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SBD
Admiral


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 1022

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's another quote from The Washington Times
June 7, 1991, Friday, Final Edition.

Col. Peck testified, as he did in his memo, that Mrs. Griffiths "interferes in or actively sabotages POW--MIA analyses or investigations" -- a characterization Mrs. Griffiths, through a spokeswoman, turned back last week as "blatantly false."

The colonel then charged in closed session -- according to the Los Angeles Times -- that Carl W. Ford Jr., a deputy secretary of Defense and the Pentagon's man in the interagency group, urged him to "go through the motions, [saying] this is a political issue and [urging] that we make the appearance of progress."

Mr. Ford is a common target. Sen. Robert Smith, a New Hampshire Republican who has proposed a Senate select committee on the POW--MIA issue, says that a few months ago he asked Mr. Ford in person and by letter to follow up some intelligence information on a possibly live American POW.

"I asked him to do it, he promised me he would do it, and it was never done," Mr. Smith says. "Now, if he wouldn't do it for a U.S. senator, it doesn't surprise me that he wouldn't do it for a refugee." The senator is referring to the usual source of "live sightings," refugees from Vietnam.

SBD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rdtf
CNO


Joined: 13 May 2004
Posts: 2209
Location: BUSHville

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great catch! Should we send this to the Republican Senators involved in the Bolton hearing??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SBD
Admiral


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 1022

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I sent it to Fox and Friends but it probably should be sent to the Republicans as well. I think it deserves some airtime.

SBD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Knighthawk
Commander


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 323
Location: Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is a link to his resignation letter. Its a pretty good read.

COL Peck's Resignation Letter
_________________
Regards,
Brian

Beware of the lollipop of mediocrity! Lick it once and you'll suck forever.

If guns kill people, then I can blame misspelled words on my pencil.

Knighthawk's Pictures!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kate
Admin


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 1891
Location: Upstate, New York

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
a link to his resignation letter. Its a pretty good read.
excelllent read,

from the link.........The Peck Resignation Letter
Quote:
3-f. "Suppressio Veri, Suggestio Falsi." Many of the puppet masters play a confusing, murky roles. For instance, the Director of the National League of Families occupies an interesting and questionable position in the whole process.

Although assiduously "churning" the account to give a tawdry illusion of progress, she is adamantly opposed to any initiative to actually get to the heart of the problem, and, more importantly, interferes in or actively sabotages POW-MIA analyses or investigations. She insists on rewriting or editing all significant documents produced by the Office, then touted as the DIA position. She apparently has access to top secret, codeword message traffic, for which she is supposedly not cleared, and she received it well ahead of the DIA intelligence analysts. Her influence in "jerking around" everyone and everything involved in the issue goes far beyond the "war and MIA protestor gone straight" scenario. She was brought from the "outside", into the center of the imbroglio, and then, cloaked in a mantle of sanctimony, routinely impedes real progress and insidiously "muddles up" the issue. One wonders who she really is and where she came from.


Going O/T from the thread, but just who IS this Ann Mills Griffiths, who was executive director of the National League of Families of American Prisoners and Missing in Southeast Asia, that Peck refers to?.

and BZ to Col Peck
_________________
.
one of..... We The People
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Poole
Vice Admiral


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 914
Location: America

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 2:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Col Peck wrote:
...the horror stories of the succession of military officers at the C-5 and C-6 level who have in some manner "rocked the boat" and quickly come to grief at the hands of the Government policy makers who direct the issue, lead one to the conclusion that we are all quite expendable...

Would one of these "policy makers" be Silky Poodle? Has Chief weighed in on this yet?
_________________
'58 Airedale HMR(L)-261 VMO-2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kate
Admin


Joined: 14 May 2004
Posts: 1891
Location: Upstate, New York

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Would one of these "policy makers" be Silky Poodle? Has Chief weighed in on this yet?


Chief 's thread, Silky was certainly involved in the whole mess,
http://horse.he.net/~swiftpow/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=88323&sid=#88323
Quote:
I worked on the US/Russia Joint Commission on POW/MIA with various Senators, Congressmen, STATE and DOD officials for 4 years. This is where my first encounter with Senator Kerry came from. His office was aloof in our work on this important issue. They refused to participate in our findings and hard work to account for American POW/MIAS from WWII, Korea, Cold War, and Vietnam -- even though Senator Kerry was appointed the Co-Chairman of the Vietnam War Working Group by President Bush Sr in 1992..............more

_________________
.
one of..... We The People
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group