SwiftVets.com Forum Index SwiftVets.com
Service to Country
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

McCain regulates Baseball

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GM Strong
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 1579
Location: Penna

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 11:43 pm    Post subject: McCain regulates Baseball Reply with quote

The Senate has no business here and McCain (_!_) should go find something important to deal with. I am disappointed with Bunning. This is not Federal Gummint business. A veto is justified here. The public is not in danger nor do they give a rat's patoot about this kind of action. This is professional baseball's problem
____________________________________
Bunning, McCain Plan New Steroids Bill
By HOWARD FENDRICH
AP Sports Writer

WASHINGTON - Aiming to spur baseball and other sports to adopt tougher steroids policies, Sens. Jim Bunning and John McCain are reintroducing legislation that would standardize drug testing and penalties for professional leagues.
The new bill combines two already proposed separately by Bunning, a Kentucky Republican who was elected to baseball's Hall of Fame in 1996, and McCain, an Arizona Republican. Bunning, a former major league pitcher, said the new legislation would be introduced Tuesday or Wednesday.

"We have heard a lot of talk from professional sports leagues that they would do something to clean up this mess, but so far it has been just that: a lot of talk," Bunning said Tuesday during a conference call with reporters. "Hopefully Congress' action will light a fire under their feet to come to an agreement before we do it for them."

Like the earlier bills from Bunning and McCain, this one is based on the Olympic model, calling for a two-year suspension for an athlete who fails a steroids test for the first time and a lifetime ban for a second offense. Athletes would be tested at least five times a year, three during the season and two in the offseason. The proposal has a provision urging leagues to erase records achieved with the help of performance-enhancing drugs.

Three House bills with similar testing minimums and punishments have been proposed, including one sponsored by Tom Davis, the Virginia Republican who chairs the Government Reform Committee. That panel held the March 17 hearing with Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire and baseball officials.

"If pro sports leagues don't get a handle on this problem on their own, members of Congress will be more than willing to do it for them," Davis spokesman Dave Marin wrote in an e-mail to The Associated Press. "No matter which bill ultimately moves forward, one thing is certain: In the absence of self-initiated progress, legislation becomes a matter of when, not if."

During congressional hearings on steroids over the past eight months, the focus has been on baseball, and while Bunning's bill would also apply to the NFL, NBA and NHL, the timing of the reintroduction is tied to last week's end of the World Series.

Baseball currently suspends a player 10 days for a first offense. In April, commissioner Bud Selig called for a 50-game suspension after an initial positive test, a 100-game ban for second-time offenders and a lifetime ban for a third violation.

Under questioning from McCain at a Senate Commerce Committee hearing Sept. 28, baseball players union head Donald Fehr said he hoped a new steroids agreement could be reached by the end of the World Series.

"Well, the World Series has come and gone, and they still have not come to an agreement, so we're going to move ahead in Congress," Bunning said. "It's my opinion that Major League Baseball and the players union will not come to an agreement that's satisfactory."

Baseball executive vice president Rob Manfred issued a statement Tuesday reiterating Selig's stances: His proposed penalties would be appropriate, changes to the sport's policy should come through collective bargaining, and Selig would support legislation if baseball and the union can't reach agreement.

Fehr declined comment Tuesday, spokesman Greg Bouris said.

During the World Series, Selig and the union's chief operating officer, Gene Orza, said negotiations on a new steroids agreement were ongoing, but both refused to comment further. Last year, the union didn't go ahead with finalizing a new drug-testing agreement until after its annual executive board meeting in early December. This year's session is scheduled for Dec. 5-9 in Henderson, Nev.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
USAFE5
PO2


Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 362
Location: Reno Nevada

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey that's going to be in my neck of the woods. Will the public be allowed in?
_________________
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I’m here to help." Ronald Reagan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jwb7605
Rear Admiral


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 690
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:02 am    Post subject: Re: McCain regulates Baseball Reply with quote

GM Strong wrote:
The Senate has no business here and McCain (_!_) should go find something important to deal with. I am disappointed with Bunning. This is not Federal Gummint business. A veto is justified here. The public is not in danger nor do they give a rat's patoot about this kind of action. This is professional baseball's problem
____________________________________
Bunning, McCain Plan New Steroids Bill
By HOWARD FENDRICH
AP Sports Writer
<SNIP>

I reluctantly, technically, disagree.
Baseball is "Gummint business" largely because it is exempt from antitrust laws. Had this sport been football or basketball, I would agree, but it's not. The gummint has it's foot in the door, and the rest will be history.
http://espn.go.com/mlb/s/2001/1205/1290707.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GM Strong
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 1579
Location: Penna

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:21 am    Post subject: Re: McCain regulates Baseball Reply with quote

jwb7605 wrote:
GM Strong wrote:
The Senate has no business here and McCain (_!_) should go find something important to deal with. I am disappointed with Bunning. This is not Federal Gummint business. A veto is justified here. The public is not in danger nor do they give a rat's patoot about this kind of action. This is professional baseball's problem
____________________________________
Bunning, McCain Plan New Steroids Bill
By HOWARD FENDRICH
AP Sports Writer
<SNIP>

I reluctantly, technically, disagree.
Baseball is "Gummint business" largely because it is exempt from antitrust laws. Had this sport been football or basketball, I would agree, but it's not. The gummint has it's foot in the door, and the rest will be history.
http://espn.go.com/mlb/s/2001/1205/1290707.html


OK, fine. When Gummint regulates anything belonging in the private sector, it goes to hell. It's done wonders for dumbing down education and screwing up a lot of other things it has no business in. What's next, making the rules fair??? Anit trust has no application in my opinion. What's next, Professional golf?? I can just imagine McCain or a Senate committee making the rules of any sport.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jwb7605
Rear Admiral


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 690
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:22 am    Post subject: Re: McCain regulates Baseball Reply with quote

GM Strong wrote:
jwb7605 wrote:
GM Strong wrote:
The Senate has no business here and McCain (_!_) should go find something important to deal with. I am disappointed with Bunning. This is not Federal Gummint business. A veto is justified here. The public is not in danger nor do they give a rat's patoot about this kind of action. This is professional baseball's problem
____________________________________
Bunning, McCain Plan New Steroids Bill
By HOWARD FENDRICH
AP Sports Writer
<SNIP>

I reluctantly, technically, disagree.
Baseball is "Gummint business" largely because it is exempt from antitrust laws. Had this sport been football or basketball, I would agree, but it's not. The gummint has it's foot in the door, and the rest will be history.
http://espn.go.com/mlb/s/2001/1205/1290707.html


OK, fine. When Gummint regulates anything belonging in the private sector, it goes to hell. It's done wonders for dumbing down education and screwing up a lot of other things it has no business in. What's next, making the rules fair??? Anit trust has no application in my opinion. What's next, Professional golf?? I can just imagine McCain or a Senate committee making the rules of any sport.

I didn't say it was right, fair, or anything. I agree with your sentiments 100%.

I just said "they have their foot in the door" already. Which seems to be all they ever need. Evil or Very Mad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GM Strong
Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy


Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 1579
Location: Penna

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:27 am    Post subject: Re: McCain regulates Baseball Reply with quote

[quote="jwb7605"]
Quote:

I didn't say it was right, fair, or anything. I agree with your sentiments 100%.

I just said "they have their foot in the door" already. Which seems to be all they ever need. Evil or Very Mad


That's right and that's what we have to bring a halt to. Step on that damned foot and shut the door. Cheers, keep the faith.
_________________
8th Army Korea 68-69
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SwiftVets.com Forum Index -> Geedunk & Scuttlebutt All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group